Trump authorizes temporary Russian oil purchase amid soaring hydrocarbon prices.
Image: El Mundo

Trump authorizes temporary Russian oil purchase amid soaring hydrocarbon prices.

13 March, 2026.Russia.2 sources

Key Takeaways

  • Trump authorizes temporary Russian oil purchases amid soaring hydrocarbon prices.
  • Rising hydrocarbon prices drive the measure and its geopolitical effects.
  • Putin is portrayed as a major beneficiary of the policy.

Policy Announcement

This significant policy shift aims at curbing the surge in global crude oil prices that exceeded $100 per barrel.

Image from Diari ARA
Diari ARADiari ARA

US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent framed this measure as a 'very tight' and 'short-term' intervention.

The measure is designed specifically to stabilize global energy markets by allowing stranded tankers to transport their crude oil cargo.

This decision represents a notable inflection point in US policy toward Russia.

It marks a change from previous approaches of price caps on Russian oil to the current legal offensive against Russia's 'shadow fleet' evading sanctions.

The timing of this decision coincides with escalating Middle East tensions and rising energy concerns.

Financial Impact

The financial implications of this policy decision are substantial for Russia's war economy.

Russian oil prices have reached $100 per barrel in the market.

Image from El Mundo
El MundoEl Mundo

This generates approximately $150 million in additional daily revenue for Russia's budget.

According to Financial Times calculations cited by El Mundo, Russia could receive $3.3-4.9 billion additional revenue by end of March.

This assumes Russian oil averages $70-80 per barrel, compared to February's $45 average.

Russian officials have openly acknowledged the benefits of this policy shift.

President Putin's Special Representative Kirill Dimitriev boasted that lifting restrictions would affect roughly 100 million barrels of Russian oil.

Dimitriev projected significant financial gains for Moscow amid the growing energy crisis.

Geopolitical Context

Iran began blocking the Strait of Hormuz through which a quarter of the world's oil supply passes.

This strategic chokepoint manipulation appears to have been anticipated by Vladimir Putin.

Putin reportedly 'began to smile, aware that the rise in hydrocarbon prices would partly offset the sanctions'.

Trump's actions have exceeded Moscow's expectations according to El Mundo's analysis.

The US is effectively subsidizing Russia's war in Europe while simultaneously fighting Iran.

The administration acknowledges this tension by calling it a 'short-term measure' that applies 'only to oil that is already in transit'.

US officials claim it 'will not bring any significant financial benefit to the Russian government', despite clear evidence to the contrary.

Policy Evolution

The policy shift represents a significant retreat from previous US efforts to contain Russia's war economy.

The Trump administration is effectively 'shedding whatever ballast is needed' as the war with Iran prolongs.

Image from El Mundo
El MundoEl Mundo

This includes exhausting years of critical munitions according to Financial Times sources.

Specific mention of depletion of long-range Tomahawk missiles was noted.

The administration's approach has evolved from comprehensive sanctions to more tactical interventions.

Recent examples include temporary clearance for Russian oil destined for India.

The sequence of decisions shows incremental accommodation benefiting Russia's war financing.

This pattern maintains the appearance of sanctions pressure while easing restrictions.

The administration appears to prioritize immediate energy market stability over long-term containment.

Russian Response

President Putin's Special Representative Kirill Dimitriev boasted on his Telegram channel.

Image from Diari ARA
Diari ARADiari ARA

Dimitriev stated that 'further loosening of restrictions on Russian energy resources seems increasingly inevitable'.

He noted this would happen 'notwithstanding resistance from some members of the Brussels bureaucracy'.

Russia views the US decision as part of a broader trend toward accepting energy market realities.

These realities benefit Moscow's war financing significantly.

Dimitriev's public confidence contrasts sharply with the administration's public statements.

There is a clear disconnect between diplomatic positioning and actual policy outcomes.

The 30-day exemption, while framed as temporary, may set a precedent for future accommodations.

This could occur as energy markets remain volatile amid continued Middle East conflicts.

More on Russia