Trump Engineers Coup, Ousts Maduro in Venezuela

A high-risk, covert operation in early January is reported to have removed Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro from power and brought him to the United States to face federal charges.

U.S. prosecutors unsealed criminal charges against Maduro and his wife and said the couple would be arraigned in Manhattan, and multiple outlets reported they were flown to New York and appeared in court.

1News

Those accounts describe an operation that U.S. sources portray as targeting narcotics networks, while Venezuelan officials and some foreign governments call the action an illegal abduction.

Several reports explicitly flag the most dramatic operational claims as unverified or reported rather than independently confirmed.

U.S. authorities released, or were reported to have released, an updated indictment and arraigned Maduro and his wife in Manhattan.

Court reports say both pleaded not guilty and a further hearing was scheduled.

9News.au

Local U.S. reporting described a Manhattan appearance in which Maduro said he had been 'kidnapped' and entered a not-guilty plea, and federal prosecutors allege narco-terrorism, cocaine-importation conspiracies, and weapons counts.

At least one report named defense counsel and noted that efforts to assert head-of-state immunity will be mounted, while U.S. officials framed the operation as targeting long-running narcotics networks.

The seizure set off immediate diplomatic and regional turbulence.

“I don’t see an article or link yet — please paste the article text or a URL (or attach a screenshot/PDF)”

ABC News

Venezuela’s National Assembly and Supreme Court moved to install Vice-President Delcy Rodríguez as acting or interim president, producing competing claims of legitimacy.

International bodies and major powers called emergency meetings and issued stark warnings.

Several outlets reported the U.N. Security Council convened to weigh legality and fallout.

Countries including China, Russia and Cuba condemned the operation as a breach of sovereignty.

Some opposition figures cautiously welcomed Maduro’s removal and discussed reconstruction and reopening the oil sector to foreign investment.

Domestically in the United States the episode produced a sharp partisan split and immediate discussion of post-operation governance and Venezuela’s oil.

Congressional Democrats complained about lack of notification and possible legal breaches.

ABC News

Some Republicans defended the action, and some U.S. leaders publicly discussed using Venezuelan oil or organizing reconstruction.

President Trump’s statements—about temporarily running aspects of Venezuela, delaying elections, and encouraging U.S. oil firms to rebuild output—featured prominently in reporting and heightened controversy about motives and oversight.

Many reports stressed that central operational details, casualty figures and chain-of-command questions remained unclear or disputed.