Trump Removes Canada From His 'Board of Peace' After Ottawa Presses for Gaza Ceasefire
Image: Zee Business

Trump Removes Canada From His 'Board of Peace' After Ottawa Presses for Gaza Ceasefire

23 January, 2026.USA.67 sources

Key Takeaways

  • Trump publicly revoked Canada's invitation to join the Board of Peace on Truth Social
  • Revocation followed Mark Carney's Davos speech criticizing economic coercion and Trump's 'Canada lives...' rebuke
  • Board of Peace aims to oversee Gaza ceasefire and reconstruction; about 35 countries joined

Trump withdraws Canada's invitation

President Donald Trump announced on Truth Social that he had withdrawn Canada's invitation to join his newly launched 'Board of Peace,' a body he unveiled at the World Economic Forum in Davos and which he initially tied to overseeing a Gaza ceasefire and reconstruction.

At the World Economic Forum in Davos, President Trump criticized Canadian leader Mark Carney, saying Canada gets “a lot of freebies” from the United States and should be more grateful

ABP Live EnglishABP Live English

The move followed a public exchange triggered by a high-profile Davos speech by Mark Carney, who warned that the rules-based global order was fraying and urged middle powers to resist economic coercion, and a subsequent rebuke by Trump that included the remark "Canada lives because of the United States."

Image from ABP Live English
ABP Live EnglishABP Live English

News outlets report the withdrawal as abrupt and politically charged, and note Carney's own response defending Canadian sovereignty: "Canada thrives because we are Canadian."

Trump's Board of Peace

Trump's 'Board of Peace' was presented at Davos as a U.S.-led mechanism to help secure a Gaza ceasefire and manage post-conflict reconstruction.

Reporting shows major ambiguities about the board's remit, membership and relationship with the United Nations.

Image from AFR
AFRAFR

Trump repeatedly said permanent members could pay $1 billion for a guaranteed seat and touted broad participation, claiming roughly 30 to 59 countries at different moments.

Outlets such as Al Jazeera and CBC reported that several key Western allies, including Britain, France and Italy, either declined or expressed serious doubts about joining.

The United Nations, though tied by a Security Council resolution to the Gaza plan, said its engagement with the body would be limited to that specific context.

Davos confrontation over trade

Those remarks drew unusual applause and were widely read as a critique of U.S. policy.

Multiple outlets recorded a sharp exchange in which Trump taunted Carney at Davos and on social media, calling Canada ungrateful and asserting "Canada lives because of the United States."

Carney replied from Quebec City, saying "Canada thrives because we are Canadian," stressing both independence and continued partnership.

Coverage consistently linked the spat to broader tensions over tariffs, defence and sovereignty.

Canada's conditional engagement

Ottawa's public posture blended caution and conditional engagement.

Canadian officials had signalled willingness in principle but insisted on safeguards.

Image from AnewZ
AnewZAnewZ

Finance Minister François-Philippe Champagne and other sources said Canada would not pay a $1 billion fee for a permanent seat.

Carney reportedly conditioned Canadian involvement on unrestricted humanitarian access to Gaza and clear governance terms.

Several Canadian outlets and international reports noted Ottawa's reticence and that Carney left Davos to work on ceasefire diplomacy.

This underlined that Canadian participation was contingent on concrete guarantees rather than automatic alignment with Trump's initiative.

Reactions to Gaza board

Some governments and commentators worry the board could undercut the UN or create a U.S.-led parallel structure.

Image from Arise News
Arise NewsArise News

Others view it as an ambitious if flawed attempt to marshal resources for Gaza.

Coverage shows divergence by region and outlet type.

West Asian outlets such as Al Jazeera emphasize the board's ambition and its unclear membership.

Western mainstream outlets (BBC, The Globe and Mail, The Telegraph) stress skepticism from European allies and the possible strain on Canada–U.S. ties.

Western alternative sources and regional press underline Trump's unilateral posture and the political theatre of the Davos rollout.

The result is a patchwork narrative in which the board's future, legitimacy and practical impact remain ambiguous and contested.

More on USA