Full Analysis Summary
Reason for decline
I can’t produce a factual, multi-source article titled "Trump Seizes De Facto Control of U.S. Chip Industry" because the only provided text is a short DW author bio and not a news article about U.S. chip policy or Trump.
There are no additional sources to synthesize or compare.
The DW snippet itself states it is an author bio and asks readers to paste the intended article if different, which demonstrates the absence of relevant content to base your requested piece on.
Given your instruction to rely strictly on the supplied articles, I must decline to invent or draw on outside material unless you provide further sources.
Please provide the reformatted version with the specified structure.
Coverage Differences
missed information
Only one source (DW, Western Mainstream) was supplied and it is an author bio unrelated to the topic. There are no West Asian, Western Alternative, or other mainstream pieces provided to compare narratives, so I cannot identify contradictions, tone differences, or omitted facts across source types.
Insufficient source materials
Your instructions require that I 'answer strictly based on the provided articles' and 'identify differences across sources', so I cannot fulfill the request without additional texts because there are no multiple sources to compare and the supplied snippet contains no material about Trump or U.S. chip policy.
The DW bio explicitly invites the user to paste the intended article, which indicates I have not been given the necessary input to perform the requested multi-source synthesis or highlight differing source tones or narratives.
Coverage Differences
narrative limitation
DW's provided content is an author biography rather than reporting on policy or corporate actions; therefore it does not present any position, quotes, or reporting about Trump or semiconductor policy to contrast with other outlets.
Provide source materials
Please paste the specific articles or snippets you want me to use, ideally multiple sources of different types (for example: Western mainstream, Western alternative, West Asian).
With those sources I will synthesize the events and explain differences in narrative, tone, and omitted facts, explicitly naming each source and quoting or reporting where appropriate.
The current DW biography acknowledges that a different article may have been intended and asks the reader to provide it.
Please provide the reformatted version with the specified structure and ensure the output is formatted as a JSON instance that conforms to the provided schema.
The schema requires an object with "paragraphs" (an array of strings) and "subheader" (a short string), and you should return four to six concise paragraphs as requested.
Coverage Differences
unique/off-topic coverage
The only supplied item (DW author bio) is off-topic relative to your request; it does not provide reporting, claims, or quotes about Trump or chip industry control, so there is no content to treat as a primary source for the requested article.
Request and output instructions
If you provide the intended article(s) about Trump and the U.S. chip industry, I will produce the requested 4–6 paragraph piece.
That piece will (a) synthesize why and what happened across sources, (b) identify and explain differences across source types, and (c) cite each paragraph with specific quotes and source names.
Until then, I must refrain from inventing details or using outside knowledge because your constraints require strict reliance on provided material.
Please provide the reformatted version with the specified structure.
The output should be formatted as a JSON instance that conforms to the provided JSON schema, and the example in the original text illustrates a well-formatted instance versus an incorrect one.
The required output schema is the JSON object shown at the end of the original message.
Coverage Differences
hypothetical vs available
I can only describe how I would handle multi-source synthesis once those sources are available; currently, only DW's author bio is available and it contains no relevant reporting to cite, so no cross-source differences can be extracted.