Full story
Mar-a-Lago peace talks
Former U.S. president Donald Trump hosted Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky at Mar-a-Lago on Dec. 28 as part of a U.S.-brokered push toward a shortened, 20-point peace framework.
“At Mar‑a‑Lago, Trump proposed a 15‑year (extendable) U.S. security guarantee for Ukraine... Trump also spoke by phone with Putin in a call the White House called “positive,””
Both leaders described progress but gave few details.
Trump said he had recently spoken with Vladimir Putin and called that exchange "good" or "positive."
Several outlets reported Trump portrayed the call as productive and even suggested Putin "wants to see Ukraine succeed," a line critics said signaled Moscow's outsized influence on the conversations in Florida.
Trump characterized the talks as close to completion, saying issues were roughly "95%" done, while Zelensky put the draft at about "90%" and stressed that security guarantees remain central to any deal.
Reporting: CNN; The Washington Post; Anadolu Ajansı; The Moscow Times; BBC.
Media reaction to Trump remarks
Critics and many outlets read Trump's conciliatory language about Putin and his apparent openness to territorial compromises as signs that Moscow's preferences were influencing the U.S. mediation.
Multiple reports cite Trump suggesting parts of Donbas may be 'up for grabs' or urging Zelensky to consider political choices that could include territorial swaps, language that Ukraine's leaders and several Western commentators found alarming given Russia's war aims.
Tabloid and right-leaning outlets tended to stress Trump's public friendliness toward Putin and his pressure on Zelensky, while mainstream outlets relayed the same facts more cautiously, noting follow-up technical talks rather than a final deal.
Reporting: The US Sun; New York Post; Daily Mail; The Telegraph; The Guardian.
Zelensky's negotiation stance
Zelensky publicly rejected any suggestion of U.S. pressure and said Ukraine would accept only deals consistent with its constitution and public consent.
“Zelensky said he asked Trump for US security guarantees lasting 30–50 years to deter future Russian aggression; current proposals under discussion envision a 15‑year guarantee with an option to extend,”
He repeatedly stated that territorial concessions would require parliamentary approval or a referendum following at least a 60-day ceasefire.
He also pushed for long-term security guarantees, often requesting 30–50 years rather than the roughly 15 years reported to be on offer from U.S. negotiators.
Ukrainian sources and regional outlets noted that Zelensky described security guarantees and military components as largely settled.
However, the destinies of the Donbas region and the Russian-held Zaporizhzhia nuclear plant remained unresolved.
Reporting: South China Morning Post, Hindustan Times, Anadolu Ajansı, The Telegraph, and The Moscow Times.
Divergent Moscow and Europe reactions
Moscow and European reactions diverged sharply in tone.
Kremlin spokespeople and advisers reiterated hardline demands, insisting any deal must include Ukrainian withdrawals from the Donbas and warning that a temporary ceasefire could only prolong the war.
European leaders convened working groups and said they would help shape guarantees and reconstruction funding.
The Kremlin publicly downplayed a direct Putin-Zelensky call and said it was not being discussed, even as Trump reported speaking with Putin and described the call as productive.
That mismatch—Trump describing positive Putin engagement while the Kremlin publicly urged Kyiv to accept territorial terms—reinforced perceptions in many outlets that Moscow’s positions were central to what U.S. mediation allowed to remain on the table.
Reporting: DW; RFI; The US Sun; News Mobile; The Moscow Times.
Media framing of meeting
Coverage reflected distinct source-type perspectives across outlets.
“Key unresolved issues: the status of Donbas, the formal end‑of‑war terms, security guarantees for Ukraine, and whether Russia would renounce territorial claims.”
Western mainstream outlets generally offered cautious, multi-sourced accounts emphasizing technical working groups and the unresolved nature of the deal.
Western tabloids and alternative outlets foregrounded Trump's warmth toward Putin and framed the meeting as pressure on Kyiv to accept territorial compromises.
West Asian and Asian outlets spotlighted the security-guarantee debate and Zelensky's demand for multi-decade commitments.
That divergence affects how readers interpret whether Trump was merely a mediator or implicitly signaling Moscow's leverage.
Some outlets report Trump's optimistic reading of Putin as a factual description of the phone call, while others explicitly treat his tone as evidence of Kremlin influence over the negotiation posture.
Across the board, however, outlets agree the central obstacles remain Donbas territory, the Zaporizhzhia plant, and enforcement of guarantees.
Reporting synthesis: The Guardian; UnHerd; South China Morning Post; The Telegraph; Anadolu Ajansi.