United States Suspends Visas for Afghan Passport Holders Citing National Security

U.S. authorities have paused visa issuance and immigration processing for Afghan passport holders and related Afghan immigration requests, citing national-security concerns after a recent violent incident in Washington, D.C.

“I don’t have the article text”

650 KENI

Multiple agencies moved quickly: the State Department paused visa issuance for Afghan passports, and U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) halted asylum decisions and certain Afghan-related adjudications pending a review of vetting procedures.

650 KENI

Officials and outlets describe the pause as indefinite while authorities re-examine prior approvals and screening practices tied to Afghan arrivals since 2021.

Officials framed the measures as national-security precautions tied to a rapidly developing criminal investigation.

The administration, citing concerns about vetting and prior admissions, expanded screening criteria and ordered re-examinations of certain green-card approvals from a 19-country list.

ABC News

USCIS Director Joseph Edlow said the changes correct prior vetting and prioritize citizen safety.

The White House and DHS additionally broadened reviews of asylum approvals issued under the previous administration and temporarily stopped some adjudications tied to Operation Allies Welcome, reflecting top-level direction to re-examine post-2021 admissions.

Authorities implemented measures after a high-profile shooting near the White House tied to a 29-year-old Afghan national identified by multiple outlets as Rahmanullah Lakanwal.

“One-line summary: - The administration paused Afghan-related immigration processing amid a vetting review, is pursuing high-level diplomacy on the Russia–Ukraine war (including private envoys and talks in Abu Dhabi), President Trump criticized and penalized South Africa over the 2026 G20 handoff, the Supreme Court left in place litigation over the president’s power to remove the Copyright Office director, and an unverified report of two National Guard shootings in D”

ABC News

He reportedly arrived under Operation Allies Welcome in 2021 and, according to several reports, applied for and was granted asylum in 2024–25.

Outlets differ on biographical details, with many U.S. and international reports saying he had worked with U.S. partner forces or CIA-backed units in Afghanistan.

Investigators continue to probe the motive and exactly who fired the shots that incapacitated the suspect.

The FBI opened an inquiry into whether the attack was terrorism, local officials described the shooting as targeted, and authorities executed searches and nationwide warrants as part of the investigation.

Civil‑rights groups, immigrant advocates and some legal experts warn the pause and related country‑wide screenings risk collective punishment, discrimination and constitutional challenges.

Advocacy groups such as CAIR described broad crackdowns tied to a single shooting as potentially unconstitutional collective punishment and cautioned against stigmatizing Afghans resettled after working with U.S. forces.

ABC News

Legal analysts widely predict litigation over sweeping restrictions modeled on earlier travel bans.

By contrast, proponents in some conservative and security‑focused outlets argue broader suspensions and re‑examinations are justified to restore public safety and correct alleged vetting gaps.

The suspension and screening expansions have immediate human and administrative impacts.

“At an event, Trump said a city that was once "one of our most unsafe places" is now "a totally safe city," claimed people can "walk down any street in Washington" safely, and thanked the National Guard for their "incredible" work”

ABC7 Los Angeles

Roughly 200,000 Afghans who arrived after 2021 now face uncertainty about immigration benefits and resettlement.

ABC7 Los Angeles

Universities and students are affected, and legal advocates warn the pause will create delays and potential humanitarian consequences.

Officials also ordered re-interviews and searches in multiple states as part of nationwide probes.

Investigators are still seeking motive and the facts remain under active investigation, leaving policy responses contested and subject to legal and public-policy debate.