US Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee Says Israel Can Take Arab Lands; 14 Countries Condemn

US Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee Says Israel Can Take Arab Lands; 14 Countries Condemn

22 February, 202614 sources compared
War on Gaza

Key Points from 14 News Sources

  1. 1

    Mike Huckabee said Israel would be justified controlling Arab territories, including the occupied West Bank

  2. 2

    Fourteen countries and three regional organisations jointly condemned the remarks

  3. 3

    States branded the comments reckless, dangerous, violating international law, and inflaming regional tensions

Full Analysis Summary

Huckabee's Israel remarks

U.S. Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee told Tucker Carlson that Israel has a biblical claim to territory "from the Nile to the Euphrates" and said "it would be fine if they... took it all."

He framed U.S. backing of Israel in explicitly religious terms and said the U.S. must "bless Israel."

His remarks, aired on a high-profile show, immediately drew diplomatic backlash and intense media coverage across regions.

Multiple outlets report he defended Israel’s actions in Gaza during the interview.

Those outlets say he later described the territorial comment as "somewhat of a hyperbolic statement."

Coverage Differences

Tone

Sources differ in how they characterise Huckabee’s remarks: WION frames the comments in theological and geopolitical terms by linking them to a concept called “Pax Judaica” and emphasising the religious framing; Anadolu Ajansı and kurdistan24.net focus on the direct quote and its legal/regional implications; The Guardian adds that the U.S. embassy said the remarks were taken out of context. Each source is reporting the same quotes but emphasises different aspects (theology, legality, or U.S. governmental distancing).

Joint regional condemnation

A coordinated joint statement, signed by 14 Arab and Muslim states plus three regional organisations, explicitly condemned the remarks as “dangerous and inflammatory,” called them a violation of international law and the UN Charter, and said such rhetoric undermines de‑escalation efforts and any two‑state horizon.

Reports across outlets differ slightly in their enumerations but consistently include the UAE, Egypt, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Qatar, Kuwait, Oman, Bahrain, Lebanon, Syria and the State of Palestine, and the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation, the Arab League and the Gulf Cooperation Council are also named repeatedly.

The coalition called for rejection of Israeli sovereignty over occupied Palestinian territory, rejection of West Bank annexation, and reaffirmed support for Palestinian self‑determination along the 1967 lines.

Coverage Differences

Narrative Framing

West Asian outlets (Anadolu Ajansı, kurdistan24.net, ummid) emphasise legal and political ramifications—invoking 1967 lines and Palestinian self‑determination—whereas Western outlets (Euronews, The Guardian) highlight the diplomatic fallout and the statement’s language (UN Charter, regional security). Local and alternative outlets add national statements and diplomatic steps (Saudi demand for State Department clarification). These are not contradictions but different emphases: legal versus diplomatic-security framing.

Regional diplomatic rebukes

Individual capitals used sharp language.

Saudi Arabia’s foreign ministry called Huckabee’s comments "extremist rhetoric" and asked the U.S. State Department for clarification.

Egypt said the remarks were a "blatant violation" of international law.

Jordan called the comments an "assault on sovereignty" and some reports described them as "irresponsible, escalatory and absurd."

Kuwait called them a "flagrant violation of international law."

Those national rebukes stressed that Israel has no sovereignty over occupied Palestinian territory and warned such rhetoric risks fuelling violence and undermining peace efforts.

Coverage Differences

Tone

Different outlets highlight different national responses with varying adjectives: WION and Clarion India quote Saudi and Egypt using words like “extremist rhetoric” and “blatant violation;” kurdistan24.net and Oz Arab Media emphasise Jordan’s description as an “assault on sovereignty” or “irresponsible, escalatory and absurd.” The variation reflects each source’s choice of which bilateral reaction to foreground rather than factual disagreement about the condemnations themselves.

Responses to Huckabee remarks

The Guardian and several outlets report the U.S. embassy said the remarks were taken out of context and that official U.S. policy had not changed.

Huckabee later called part of his phrasing "somewhat of a hyperbolic statement" and clarified other interview points on X.

Some reports note domestic Israeli reactions, with kurdistan24.net recording that Israel’s parliament speaker praised Huckabee’s overall pro‑Israel stance.

That contrast shows a split between U.S. diplomatic signals and pro‑Israel political support in Jerusalem.

Coverage Differences

Missed Information

Some Western mainstream outlets (The Guardian, Euronews) stress the U.S. embassy’s distancing—quoting it as saying the remarks were taken out of context and that policy didn’t change—whereas West Asian outlets (kurdistan24.net) include how Israeli politicians reacted positively. Alternative and local outlets (SSBCrack News, The Eastleigh Voice) reiterate both the apology/clarification and the breadth of regional condemnations. These are complementary coverage choices, not direct contradictions, but they produce different impressions of diplomatic fallout versus domestic political support.

Reactions to provocative rhetoric

Analysts and several outlets warned of wider implications.

Anadolu Ajansı, ummid and Euronews report that a joint statement said such rhetoric would fuel violence, undermine prospects for peace and derail de-escalation efforts.

WION situates Huckabee’s language within a broader ideological project it calls 'Pax Judaica', linking the idea to technological, surveillance and defence cooperation.

That divergence shows some sources treating the story as a legal and diplomatic crisis and others as part of a larger ideological push toward a form of Greater Israel.

All sources cited the risk the remarks pose to a two-state political horizon and regional stability.

Coverage Differences

Unique Coverage

WION uniquely links Huckabee’s language to the concept of “Pax Judaica” and situates it within a technological, surveillance and AI-enabled Israel‑centered order (noted as related to “Pax Silica”), while Anadolu Ajansı and Euronews focus on immediate legal and diplomatic consequences and the reaffirmation of the 1967 lines. This shows WION offering ideological analysis beyond the diplomatic condemnations emphasised by other outlets.

All 14 Sources Compared

Anadolu Ajansı

14 countries, including Türkiye, condemn US envoy’s remarks on Israeli control over Arab lands

Read Original

BBC

US ambassador's Israel comments condemned by Arab and Muslim nations

Read Original

Clarion India

Arab Countries Condemn US Ambassador's Remarks over Israeli 'Right' to Entire Middle East

Read Original

Dubai Eye 103.8

UAE, Arab states condemn US ambassador remarks on Israel

Read Original

Euronews

Arab and Islamic states denounce US Ambassador’s Israel land remarks

Read Original

kurdistan24.net

Arab and Islamic Countries Condemn U.S. Ambassador to Israel Over Remarks on West Bank

Read Original

Morocco World News

‘Grand Israel’: PJD Condemns US’ Mike Huckabee’s ‘Provocative and Dangerous’ Remarks

Read Original

News of Bahrain

Arab States Condemn US Envoy Remarks | THE DAILY TRIBUNE | KINGDOM OF BAHRAIN

Read Original

Oz Arab Media

Arab Nations Condemn US Ambassador’s Remarks on Israel’s Expansion

Read Original

SSBCrack News

Arab and Islamic Nations Condemn US Ambassador Huckabee's Remarks on Israel's Biblical Claims to Middle East Land

Read Original

The Eastleigh Voice

14 countries, regional bodies condemn US Ambassador Huckabee’s remarks on Israeli control of Arab territories

Read Original

The Guardian

Huckabee’s Israel land remarks condemned as ‘dangerous and inflammatory’

Read Original

ummid

US Envoy's endorsement of Israel's expansion sparks outrage

Read Original

WION

Arab and Muslim nations condemn US ambassador’s ‘Greater Israel’ remarks, demand clarification

Read Original