Full story
Huckabee's Israel remarks
U.S. Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee told Tucker Carlson that Israel has a biblical claim to territory "from the Nile to the Euphrates" and said "it would be fine if they... took it all."
“US Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee sparked a diplomatic backlash after endorsing the idea of a “Pax Judaica”/Greater Israel in an interview with Tucker Carlson, asserting a biblical claim that Israel’s territory should extend broadly “from the Nile to the Euphrates.””
He framed U.S. backing of Israel in explicitly religious terms and said the U.S. must "bless Israel."
His remarks, aired on a high-profile show, immediately drew diplomatic backlash and intense media coverage across regions.
Multiple outlets report he defended Israel’s actions in Gaza during the interview.
Those outlets say he later described the territorial comment as "somewhat of a hyperbolic statement."
Joint regional condemnation
A coordinated joint statement, signed by 14 Arab and Muslim states plus three regional organisations, explicitly condemned the remarks as “dangerous and inflammatory,” called them a violation of international law and the UN Charter, and said such rhetoric undermines de‑escalation efforts and any two‑state horizon.
Reports across outlets differ slightly in their enumerations but consistently include the UAE, Egypt, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Qatar, Kuwait, Oman, Bahrain, Lebanon, Syria and the State of Palestine, and the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation, the Arab League and the Gulf Cooperation Council are also named repeatedly.
The coalition called for rejection of Israeli sovereignty over occupied Palestinian territory, rejection of West Bank annexation, and reaffirmed support for Palestinian self‑determination along the 1967 lines.
Regional diplomatic rebukes
Individual capitals used sharp language.
“Saudi Arabia’s foreign ministry condemned the remarks as “extremist rhetoric,” demanding clarification from the U.S. State Department.”
Saudi Arabia’s foreign ministry called Huckabee’s comments "extremist rhetoric" and asked the U.S. State Department for clarification.
Egypt said the remarks were a "blatant violation" of international law.
Jordan called the comments an "assault on sovereignty" and some reports described them as "irresponsible, escalatory and absurd."
Kuwait called them a "flagrant violation of international law."
Those national rebukes stressed that Israel has no sovereignty over occupied Palestinian territory and warned such rhetoric risks fuelling violence and undermining peace efforts.
Responses to Huckabee remarks
The Guardian and several outlets report the U.S. embassy said the remarks were taken out of context and that official U.S. policy had not changed.
Huckabee later called part of his phrasing "somewhat of a hyperbolic statement" and clarified other interview points on X.
Some reports note domestic Israeli reactions, with kurdistan24.net recording that Israel’s parliament speaker praised Huckabee’s overall pro‑Israel stance.
That contrast shows a split between U.S. diplomatic signals and pro‑Israel political support in Jerusalem.
Reactions to provocative rhetoric
Analysts and several outlets warned of wider implications.
“They warned that continued Israeli expansionism and “incendiary statements” would fuel violence and undermine prospects for peace.”
Anadolu Ajansı, ummid and Euronews report that a joint statement said such rhetoric would fuel violence, undermine prospects for peace and derail de-escalation efforts.
WION situates Huckabee’s language within a broader ideological project it calls 'Pax Judaica', linking the idea to technological, surveillance and defence cooperation.
That divergence shows some sources treating the story as a legal and diplomatic crisis and others as part of a larger ideological push toward a form of Greater Israel.
All sources cited the risk the remarks pose to a two-state political horizon and regional stability.