U.S. Designates Colombia's Clan del Golfo (Gaitanist Army of Colombia) as Foreign Terrorist Organization

U.S. Designates Colombia's Clan del Golfo (Gaitanist Army of Colombia) as Foreign Terrorist Organization

16 December, 20254 sources compared
South America

Key Points from 4 News Sources

  1. 1

    U.S. State Department labeled the Gaitanist Army of Colombia a Foreign Terrorist Organization.

  2. 2

    Group is Colombia's largest armed criminal organization, profiting from cocaine, illegal gold mining, and extortion.

  3. 3

    Designation forms part of U.S. strategy against transnational organized crime, increasing penalties for supporters.

Full Analysis Summary

U.S. designation of EGC

On Dec. 16, 2025, the U.S. State Department designated Colombia’s Clan del Golfo—also known as the Gaitanist Army of Colombia (EGC)—as a Foreign Terrorist Organization and a Specially Designated Global Terrorist.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio said the move fits Washington’s broader strategy against transnational organized crime and cited specific legal authorities in making the designation.

The designation formalizes U.S. legal tools to target the group and its supporters while publicly labeling the EGC’s activities as both criminal and terroristic.

Coverage Differences

Tone and framing

Sources differ in emphasis: CiberCuba foregrounds the U.S. legal basis and strategy ('section 219... and Executive Order 13224'), The Bogotá Post reports the designation in straightforward terms and notes its official scope, while Hindustan Times emphasizes Secretary Rubio’s personal characterization of the group as a 'violent and powerful criminal organization.' Each source thus frames the same announcement through legal, neutral-reporting, or rhetorical lenses respectively.

Clan del Golfo size estimates

Estimates of the group's size differ markedly across reports.

CiberCuba describes the Clan del Golfo as Colombia's largest criminal group with an estimated 9,000 members.

By contrast, The Bogotá Post cites analysts who estimate roughly 3,000-3,500 uniformed fighters plus about 6,000 additional members in criminal networks, a breakdown that distinguishes frontline combatants from broader networks.

Hindustan Times does not give a single aggregate number but underscores the presence of top leaders and the negotiators' concerns, reflecting a focus on leadership and political dimensions rather than a single membership tally.

Coverage Differences

Contradiction / Numeric discrepancy

CiberCuba reports 'an estimated 9,000 members' and therefore presents a single consolidated figure, while The Bogotá Post breaks the group into '3,000–3,500 uniformed fighters' plus 'about 6,000 additional members,' producing a similar total by sum but a different framing that separates fighters from networks. Hindustan Times omits specific aggregate figures and instead focuses on leadership and negotiation context, which is a different informational emphasis.

Group funding and actions

All three sources identify cocaine trafficking as the group's principal revenue source.

The Bogotá Post additionally lists illegal gold mining, widespread extortion, and the operation of legal businesses as funding streams and business activities that other reports omit or downplay.

CiberCuba explicitly calls cocaine trafficking the primary revenue source.

The Hindustan Times likewise emphasizes cocaine trafficking, links the group to violent attacks, and notes the group's efforts to portray itself as a political actor amid skepticism about genuine political aims.

Coverage Differences

Missed information / Added detail

CiberCuba and Hindustan Times both highlight cocaine trafficking as primary revenue, but The Bogotá Post provides a broader account including 'illegal gold mining and widespread extortion' and mentions 'operating legal businesses.' That means Bogotá Post supplies additional economic detail that the other sources either do not mention or do not emphasize.

Tone / political framing

Hindustan Times additionally reports that the group 'has tried to frame itself as a political actor' but 'is not broadly seen as having genuine political aims,' a qualitative judgment about the group's political positioning that the other two sources do not explicitly make.

Designation's impact on talks

The designation arrives amid ongoing peace talks between the Colombian government and the EGC in Qatar, and sources diverge on the possible effects of the U.S. move on that process.

Hindustan Times highlights the diplomatic context, noting 'Colombia’s leftist President Gustavo Petro’s government is holding peace talks with the Clan del Golfo in Qatar' and reporting that 'Colombia’s chief negotiator said top leaders would face prison time under any deal.'

The Bogotá Post explicitly warns the FTO label 'may jeopardize ongoing peace talks in Qatar' and stresses the designation’s potential to expose financial ties.

CiberCuba mentions the move as part of U.S. strategy against transnational organized crime but does not dwell on the peace-process risks in the same way.

Coverage Differences

Narrative emphasis / Missed information

Hindustan Times and The Bogotá Post foreground the peace talks in Qatar and potential jeopardy from the FTO label, including direct quotes from negotiators, while CiberCuba focuses more narrowly on U.S. legal strategy and does not emphasize the potential diplomatic fallout, representing a divergence in coverage priorities.

U.S. designation consequences

Practical consequences described across sources include enhanced U.S. authority to pursue material support networks and potential exposure of business ties.

CiberCuba references the specific legal authorities used for the designation: section 219 of the Immigration and Nationality Act and Executive Order 13224.

The Bogotá Post notes that the foreign terrorist organization label allows U.S. authorities to pursue anyone providing material support but cautions it is not an automatic legal justification for military intervention.

Hindustan Times quotes U.S. officials saying the United States will use all available tools to protect itself and counter international cartels and transnational criminal organizations, signaling a potentially tougher posture in enforcement and cooperation.

Coverage Differences

Policy implications / Clarification

While CiberCuba highlights the statutory and executive authorities underpinning the designation, The Bogotá Post clarifies what the label legally enables (pursuing material-support providers) but also warns it 'is not automatic legal justification for military intervention.' Hindustan Times emphasizes the U.S. intent to 'use all available tools,' a stronger enforcement posture in tone. Together the sources show legal mechanics, operational authorities, and rhetorical intent in different proportion.

All 4 Sources Compared

Al Jazeera

US officially labels Colombia’s EGC group a ‘terrorist organization’

Read Original

CiberCuba

The U.S. designates the Colombian group Clan del Golfo as a terrorist organization and explains the reason

Read Original

Hindustan Times

US designates Colombia's Clan del Golfo gang as a terrorist group | World News

Read Original

The Bogotá Post

Washington designated Colombia’s EGC a terrorist organization: what now?

Read Original