Zohran Mamdani Rescinds Eric Adams' Pro‑Israel Executive Orders, Removes IHRA Antisemitism Definition
Image: WION

Zohran Mamdani Rescinds Eric Adams' Pro‑Israel Executive Orders, Removes IHRA Antisemitism Definition

03 January, 2026.Gaza Genocide.10 sources

Key Takeaways

  • Mamdani rescinded multiple Eric Adams executive orders, including the IHRA antisemitism definition
  • Mamdani lifted city restrictions on pro‑Palestine BDS boycotts previously banned by Adams
  • Israel and leading Jewish groups called the rollbacks antisemitic and dangerous for Jewish New Yorkers

NYC mayor policy reversals

On his first day in office, New York City mayor Zohran Mamdani revoked multiple executive orders issued by his predecessor Eric Adams that had adopted the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) working definition of antisemitism and restricted city participation in boycotts of Israel.

New York City’s new mayor, Zohran Mamdani, has enraged Israel after scrapping a Zionist-approved IHRA definition of antisemitism and revoking decrees banning a popular anti-Israel BDS boycott campaign on his first day in office

5Pillars5Pillars

City officials said the changes took effect immediately and removed the IHRA definition from city policy and training while lifting bans on Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) activities in government settings.

Image from 5Pillars
5Pillars5Pillars

Mamdani characterized the broader rescissions as giving his administration a 'clean slate' and said he would still fund hate-crime prevention and protect Jewish New Yorkers.

International criticism of revocations

The revocations prompted sharp international criticism, especially from Israel's foreign ministry, which used social posts to condemn Mamdani's actions.

Several outlets reported that Israel's foreign ministry accused Mamdani of effectively fueling antisemitism by removing a common standard for identifying anti-Jewish hatred, with one formulation quoted as "antisemitic gasoline on an open fire."

Image from Algemeiner
AlgemeinerAlgemeiner

Media coverage highlights that Israeli officials publicly called the moves blameworthy and reacted within hours of the signings.

Supporters' views on IHRA

Supporters of the rescissions, including civil‑liberties and pro‑Palestine advocates cited in coverage, say removing the IHRA definition prevents censorship of criticism of Israeli government policy and restores protected political speech.

New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani speaks at Grand Army Plaza in Brooklyn on January 02, 2026 in New York City

Bangi NewsBangi News

The New York chapter of CAIR called the IHRA definition "controversial and overly broad" and said it is often used to censor criticism of Israeli government policy and to limit boycotts.

Other supporters described Adams's prior orders as unconstitutional or an improper restriction on speech and pension decisions.

Responses to revocations

Critics — including Israeli officials, some local Jewish groups and Republican politicians — say the revocations weaken tools used to combat antisemitism and could endanger Jewish communities.

Mainstream coverage notes warnings that federal civil-rights officials will monitor potential violations of religious liberties.

Image from Fox News
Fox NewsFox News

Outlets report that the Department of Justice's civil-rights chief warned the agency will watch for and act on violations.

Multiple reports frame the revocations as politically risky amid concerns about antisemitism in the city.

Gaps in media coverage

Coverage across the provided sources leaves gaps and varying emphases.

That didn’t take long

New York PostNew York Post

Algemeiner’s brief note claims a 67% unfavorable rating but the snippet omits who "him" refers to and lacks poll methodology.

Image from New York Post
New York PostNew York Post

Most outlets focus on the policy and political fallout without detailed polling or demographic context.

Several outlets link Mamdani’s actions to rescinding orders issued after Adams’s 2024 indictment, which the Guardian notes were later dropped.

Reporting differs on whether the move is primarily administrative, a free‑speech corrective, or a risky rollback of tools to fight antisemitism.

The evidence in these snippets is therefore mixed and incomplete.

More on Gaza Genocide