How they replied.

• NHSNHS Gave Palantir 'Unlimited Access' to 50 Million Patient Records.Review refusedNHS England (Data Protection Officer)·August 2026Participants pressed NHS England to carry out and publish a formal review of the Palantir platform. The Data Protection Officer refused, pointing instead to NHS England's own published material and to an independent evaluation that has still not reported, nearly three years into the seven year, 330 million pound contract. The letter confirms in writing that patients have no opt-out and no effective right to object.
• PCSacha Baron Cohen retired Ali G. Amazon revived the caricature. Cinemas can refuse it.Not planning to screen itPicturehouse Cinemas·August 2026·Same reply to 2 participantsPicturehouse answered on the day the first letters went out: 'We currently do not have any plans to screen this film on its release.' That is the outcome every letter asks a chain for. Picturehouse is the first chain to state a position, it no longer receives letters from this campaign, and the same question now stands with every chain that has not answered.
• NFSacha Baron Cohen retired Ali G. Amazon revived the caricature. Cinemas can refuse it.Will screen itNordisk Film Biografer·August 2026·Same reply to 4 participantsDenmark's largest chain confirmed the booking: 'I can inform you that the film Ali G: Who Iz I? is scheduled to be shown in our cinemas.' It framed the request as censorship: 'We do not consider it our task as a cinema to exercise censorship or to reject films that are legally distributed and aimed at an adult audience, based on discussions about the film's moral or satirical justification.' The letters asked for no such thing. They asked a cinema to make a programming choice, and Picturehouse made the opposite one in the same week.
• BBCJeremy Bowen Anti-Palestinian Bias on BBC News BroadcastAll four grounds rejectedBBC·August 2026The BBC rejected every ground of the complaint about Jeremy Bowen's analysis on BBC News at One on 31 July, granted no correction, and answered none of the four remedies that were asked for. On the Gaza population figure it named no source. On a death toll set against an Israeli attitude it defended including both points, which nobody had disputed. On 1948 it answered accuracy when the complaint was about attribution. On the missing international legal findings it pleaded that the item was only about the peace plan.
• BBCSix of one family burnt alive in Gaza. The BBC wrote it so that nobody did it.All four grounds rejectedBBC·August 2026·Same reply to 4 participantsThe BBC Complaints Team sent one combined reply to the complaints about its report on the killing of Firas al-Masri, his wife Salsabeel and their four children Faryal, Salma, Amira and Naim, burnt to death in their home in Gaza City. It rejected every ground: the paragraph reporting the family burnt to death needed no actor because the headline had already said 'Israeli strikes', the sourcing labels on Palestinian casualty figures are required caveats, and identical wording for the two sides is not required because Gaza's 'civilian infrastructure has entirely crumbled, whereas Israel remains a functioning democracy'. It granted no correction, no clarification and no review.
• BBCIsrael Killed a Seven-Month-Old Palestinian Baby in the West Bank. Five Newsrooms Sanitised It.Not upheld, final BBC stageBBC·July 2026The BBC's Executive Complaints Unit, the final stage of the BBC's own complaints process before Ofcom, rejected the complaint about the headline 'Palestinian baby killed by Israeli gunfire in West Bank, health ministry says'. It ruled that whether a headline names the human actor is 'a concept which is not recognised in the guidelines', that the wording 'might have been improved upon but that does not show it was inaccurate', and that no reader would be 'materially misled'. It granted no headline change, no clarification note and no review.
• BBCThe BBC reported Israel's denial as fact. It didn't tell you Israel gave no evidence.Qualifier refusedBBC·July 2026·Same reply to 2 participantsThe BBC rejected the campaign's core ask: that its reporting of the Israeli Prison Service's denial of Dr Abu Safiya's mistreatment should say that no evidence was provided and that the denial cannot be independently verified. The Complaints Team said it does 'not agree that this type of qualification was required' because the denial was 'clearly attributed to the prison service, rather than presented as an established fact'. It also said the 14:45 segment complained about had broadcast an IDF response, not the prison service statement, which the programme had not yet received.
• IPSOThe Spectator said a UN report has 'no evidence' Israel targeted children. The report says otherwise.Refused to investigateIPSO·July 2026·Same reply to 3 participantsIPSO declined to investigate the Spectator article and found no possible breach of Clause 1. The complaints identified checkable false statements of fact: the article said the UN inquiry 'cannot produce one clearly documented case' when the report documents specific cases, called its evidence 'a doctor's guess' when the inquiry consulted two independent forensic pathologists and used audio ballistic analysis, and dismissed it as 'unverified' material. IPSO's answer was to reclassify each factual claim as the writer's opinion.
• MPArabic Words Are Not Crimes.Engaged, review underwayCalvin Bailey MP·July 2026Calvin Bailey MP sent the first substantive reply, with other MPs written to through the campaign yet to respond. He defended free speech and the right to protest, confirmed there is no prohibition on protesting for Palestinians, and said the Government has commissioned a review of public order and hate crime legislation to improve consistency and give police clarity on what can be said at protests.
• IPSO8 Western Outlets Covered 'Silenced No More'. None Disclosed What Was Missing.No breach foundIPSO·July 2026IPSO declined to investigate the Daily Mail's coverage. It ruled that the complaints, which said the article presented the Civil Commission on October 7th Crimes report as authoritative without disclosing questions about the organisation, its founder or its methodology, did not raise a possible breach of the Editors' Code.
• RMRoyal Mail Lists Gaza and the West Bank as Israel. Tell Them to Correct It.Label removedRoyal Mail·July 2026Royal Mail have quietly removed the egregious label 'Israel - Gaza & Khan Yunis' from their website, without any public apology or explanation. The mislabelling that filed Gaza and Khan Yunis under Israel is gone.
• CPJRestore CPJ's Definition of a Journalist, and Remove the Board Chair Who Rewrote It.First demand metCommittee to Protect Journalists (CPJ)·July 2026After a NewsCord campaign in which supporters sent more than 730 emails to CPJ's board, the board voted on 1 July 2026 to affirm CPJ's existing definition of who is a journalist, anchored in international humanitarian law, and rejected any change that would exclude Palestinian and Lebanese press. That was the campaign's first demand.
• BBCAl-Aqsa Is in Occupied East Jerusalem, Not 'in Israel'. File a BBC Accuracy Complaint About From Our Own Correspondent.Error admitted and removedBBC·July 2026The BBC accepted that the programme was wrong to place the Al-Aqsa compound 'in Israel' and confirmed the error has been edited out of BBC Sounds and the programme podcast.
• BBCBBC, Sky, CNN, The Times, Reuters, ITV, LBC & The Guardian Cut 'Anti-Muslim Hate' From Prince Harry's HeadlinesArticle amendedBBC·June 2026The BBC amended the article by moving Prince Harry's reference to anti-Muslim and other hate up in the text and added context on Middle East casualties, noting the changes for readers.
• MET26 testimonies. Who protected the protesters at the Edgware demonstration?No action takenMetropolitan Police Service·June 2026The Metropolitan Police Service stated it would not deal with the complaint about the Edgware demonstration policing.
• IPSOBBC, Sky, CNN, The Times, Reuters, ITV, LBC & The Guardian Cut 'Anti-Muslim Hate' From Prince Harry's HeadlinesNo breach foundIPSO·June 2026IPSO decided there was no breach of the Editors' Code as the article did mention Islamophobia and newspapers have editorial freedom to focus on certain aspects of a story.
• NHSNHS Gave Palantir 'Unlimited Access' to 50 Million Patient Records.No opt-out allowedNHS England (Data Protection Officer)·June 2026·Same reply to 10 participantsNHS England refused the right to object to data processing and confirmed there is no opt-out mechanism for the NHS FDP.
• IPSOThe Telegraph Called a Letter About Israeli Military Service a 'Jew Register'. File an IPSO Complaint in One Click.No breach foundIPSO·June 2026·Same reply to 2 participantsIPSO decided the article did not breach accuracy or discrimination clauses as it was opinion and the author was entitled to his interpretation.
• IPSOYou call it illegal. Why are we still trading with it?No breach foundIPSO·June 2026IPSO rejected the complaint, saying the headline was not inaccurate or misleading and that the newspaper was entitled to its framing.
• BBCA Panel on AI With No Critics. File a BBC Impartiality Complaint About the Question Time AI Special.No breach foundBBC·June 2026The BBC said the Question Time AI special was impartial and fairly represented a range of views on artificial intelligence.

How this works: participants log the replies they receive in their private My Campaigns vault. Only replies where the participant explicitly consented to public sharing appear here, and only after an automated summariser has stripped every personal detail (names, addresses, email addresses, case and reference numbers). We name the institution, never the individual who complained. If you logged a response and want it removed, delete the entry in My Campaigns or email [email protected].