Full story
Greenland and NATO shock
Europe’s leaders faced a fresh rupture test after Donald Trump pressed for Groenlandia, demanding the “derecho, título y propiedad” while also renouncing the use of force and later praising a new “marco” at Davos.
“Trump afirmó que Estados Unidos ha pagado “el 100%” de la OTAN”
La Vanguardia warned that Trump’s Greenland crisis offered lessons for European capitals because Trump “afrontó su reclamación habló de la OTAN con un desprecio que debería poner en alerta máxima”.
In parallel, Les Echos framed the Greenland threat as unprecedented within NATO, saying it was “la primera vez en la historia de la OTAN” that a member state threatened to annex an ally’s territory.
Alexandra de Hoop Scheffer, president of the German Marshall Fund, said Europeans must be prepared to shoulder a power dynamic with Washington, while Les Echos described an “Article 5 paradox” in which the guarantor of collective security becomes the threat itself.
The same La Vanguardia piece argued that even if the immediate crisis passed, it could be “solo una retirada táctica,” leaving open the possibility that Trump would revive pressure through tariffs or even force.
Tariffs, mistrust, and responses
As Trump’s Greenland push collided with European security politics, La Matinale Européenne described a summit in Brussels where leaders’ relief was “perceptible” after the threat appeared to pass, but said Europe still failed to live up to its own power.
The same analysis quoted Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk saying “what we need today in politics is trust and respect among all our partners, and not domination or coercion.”
TradingView reported that U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio sought to reassure European leaders in Munich, but that “trust is no longer the same” despite diplomatic phrases and historical references.
TradingView also tied the unease to concrete decisions, noting that Trump had threatened to resort to military action to seize Greenland before backing down, and that the episode added to “the tariffs imposed on European countries last year.”
In Clarin’s account from Zurich, Trump warned he would impose a new round of tariffs unless the United States took responsibility for Greenland, and when asked how far he was willing to go, Trump told reporters at the White House: “You’ll see.”
What comes next for Europe
Beyond Greenland, multiple outlets portrayed the transatlantic relationship as entering a phase where Europe must plan for a post-American security posture, with La Vanguardia arguing that “cada desencuentro bajo Trump amenaza con ser existencial.”
“there is no longer any doubt that the U.S. president, Donald Trump, intends to end the North Atlantic alliance”
Perfil described the “post-American future of Europe” as already underway, warning that “there is no longer any doubt that the U.S. president, Donald Trump, intends to end the North Atlantic alliance.”
TIME France warned that NATO’s future in the Trump era carries “the real risk of a rupture in the transatlantic alliance due to President Donald Trump’s attacks on Europe and his determination to buy or annex Greenland.”
In that context, La Vanguardia said the European benefit from the Greenland episode was limited, because Trump could still “buscar algún tipo de ventaja” by reviving the threat of tariffs or force.
Les Echos concluded that the coming days would determine whether a “grand deal” on Arctic security could still emerge within a strengthened NATO framework, or whether the crisis marked an “irreversible rupture” in the transatlantic partnership.