Full story
Trial Delay and Defense
Jurors in Lindsay Clancy’s murder trial were sent home for the day on Wednesday afternoon after Judge William Sullivan described an "unforeseen circumstance" and told them, "You're not to speculate about what it is."
“Judge William Sullivan described as an "unforeseen circumstance"”
Testimony was scheduled to resume at 9 a.m. on Thursday as defense attorney Kevin Reddington continued presenting Clancy’s case, including calling clinical and forensic psychologist Paul Zeizel to walk jurors through what Clancy described as a downward spiral in the months before the killings.

Clancy, 36, is facing three counts of first-degree murder for the deaths of her 5-year-old daughter Cora, 3-year-old son Dawson, and infant son Callan at her family’s home in the Boston suburb of Duxbury on Jan. 24, 2023, and she has pleaded not guilty.
Reddington argued that postpartum psychosis led Clancy to kill her three children and attempt to take her own life, while defense lawyers do not contest that Clancy was responsible for the deaths.
Zeizel testified that Clancy’s intrusive thoughts became unrelenting and that by Jan. 24, 2023, she could no longer determine right from wrong, saying, "She was unable to conform her behaviors to the rule of law, and she had no appreciation for the wrongfulness of her act."
Competing Psychiatric Views
ABC News reported that psychiatrists who treated Lindsay Clancy in the months before she strangled her three children told jurors she did not show signs of psychosis prior to the killings.
Psychiatrist Alia Goodheart testified, "I did not have any concerns about her safety or her risk for anybody else," and said Clancy told her her family—namely her children and her mother—was the main reason she did not want to harm herself.

Goodheart acknowledged on cross examination that she never treated a patient with postpartum psychosis, and ABC News said prosecutors have attempted to cast doubt on Clancy’s claim that she was not properly treated, alleging she changed doctors and medications frequently.
Jennifer Tufts, a psychiatrist who treated Clancy beginning in September 2022, told jurors that during her 14 telehealth appointments the two sought to find a medication regimen that would treat Clancy’s anxiety and depression without affecting her sleep.
Tufts testified that Clancy appeared to believe a faulty drug combination "was making her depressed, when in reality, I think she was just depressed."
Religion Dispute and Stakes
In another development during the trial, Judge William Sullivan denied a defense request for a mistrial after prosecutors mentioned Clancy’s religion during testimony, and Sullivan told the courtroom, "I am not going to declare a mistrial at this time."
“"I am not going to declare a mistrial at this time,"”
The defense attorney Kevin Reddington accused prosecutors of "intentional misconduct" after they asked forensic psychologist Kirk Heilbrun about a conversation in which Heilbrun said they discussed her Catholic upbringing and the notion of suicide as a "mortal sin."
After denying the mistrial request, Sullivan instructed jurors to ignore the religion-related testimony, calling it "an inappropriate area of inquiry" and saying Heilbrun's "understanding of Catholic dogma or Catholic teaching is irrelevant."
The trial centers on whether Clancy is criminally responsible for the Jan. 24, 2023 killings in Duxbury, and ABC News said she has pleaded not guilty while the defense argues postpartum psychosis and extreme mental illness.
If convicted, the ABC News report said Clancy faces life in prison without parole, while if found not guilty because of a lack of criminal responsibility, she would be committed to a state mental health facility.
