Full story
No verdict after 17 hours
Jurors in Lindsay Clancy’s murder trial in Plymouth County Superior Court resumed deliberations on Monday and left for the day without a verdict after deliberations passed 17 hours.
“left without a decision as deliberations passed 17 hours”
ABC News said the jury had been deliberating for about 16 hours total over a span of three days and were expected to continue deliberating on Tuesday.
Clancy has pleaded not guilty to three murder charges, and the jury is tasked with deciding whether she is criminally responsible for killing her three children in their Duxbury home on Jan. 24, 2023.
CBS News reported that Plymouth Superior Court Judge William Sullivan sent jurors home shortly before 4 p.m. and that deliberations were expected to resume Tuesday around 9 a.m.
Defense attorney Kevin Reddington told reporters outside the courthouse, “Typical. Nervous,” as the panel continued weighing the case.
Competing mental-health narratives
As deliberations continued, the central dispute remained whether Clancy was criminally responsible despite postpartum mental illness, with both sides agreeing she fatally strangled her children with exercise resistance bands on January 24, 2023.
CNN en Español quoted prosecutor Jennifer Sprague saying, “I’m not saying she was happy about it. I’m saying it was what she had to do to end her suffering,” and added that it was “a decision. a decision.”
CNN en Español also quoted defense forensic psychiatrist Dr. Phillip Resnick describing the defense theory that “It was almost as if she were a puppet and someone else was pulling the strings,” during the postpartum psychotic episode.
NBC Boston reported that jurors heard testimony from more than 80 witnesses and that the jury asked to review pill bottles and a knife entered into evidence, with Reddington saying on Monday that the jury never got to see those pieces of evidence.
The jury’s options include guilty of murder, guilty of intentional or unpremeditated homicide, guilty of homicide with mitigating circumstances, not guilty by reason of lack of criminal responsibility, and not guilty, according to CNN en Español.
What’s at stake next
If the jury finds Clancy criminally responsible, ABC News said she could face life in prison without parole if found guilty of first-degree murder, while CNN en Español laid out that murder carries life imprisonment without the possibility of parole.
“If she is found guilty, Clancy could face life in prison without parole.”
If jurors find Clancy not guilty by reason of lack of criminal responsibility, ABC News said she will be sent to a state mental health facility, and CNN en Español described that the court could begin proceedings to commit her to a mental health facility with an initial commitment lasting six months.
CBS News reported that jurors were considering whether Clancy is criminally responsible for killing her three young children in their Duxbury home, or if she was not criminally responsible for what she was doing.
NBC Boston said Clancy remains hospitalized at Tewksbury Hospital since 2023 and that psychologist Dr. Kirk Heilbrun testified she remains at risk of suicide, with the quote “It still exists for her,”.
As deliberations resumed Tuesday at 9 a.m., the case continued to hinge on the jury’s assessment of criminal responsibility and mental illness under Massachusetts law, including the definition Judge William Sullivan gave to jurors about when a person is not criminally responsible.