Full story
U-turn after backlash
FIFA president Gianni Infantino scrapped his FIFA Forward Enterprise (FFE) plan to open FIFA competitions to private investors after UEFA and Concacaf questioned his leadership and said he had lost their confidence.
““As a result, this proposal will not proceed.””
UEFA said the proposal created divisions and that “No option should be off the table,” while the European body said it would work with its associations and in close cooperation with other confederations to reflect on how it happened.

The dispute centered on a plan first announced on Tuesday to create a “FIFA Forward Enterprise (FFE)” entity valued at US$20-billion and to sell about a 20 per cent stake, with FIFA saying it would raise up to US$4.2-billion.
FIFA’s reversal came after Infantino’s senior adviser Carlos Cordeiro resigned, calling the Joshua Kushner-backed $20-billion commercial subsidiary plan “a bad deal for football,” and after UEFA’s 55 member nations voted unanimously to boycott FIFA tournaments until the proposal was withdrawn.
In a Friday statement, Infantino said, “As a result, this proposal will not proceed,” framing the decision as a response to divisions that no longer served the objective set out in the first place.
UEFA, FA, and FIFA
UEFA’s leadership accused Infantino of “secret schemes” and “shabby backroom deals,” and said it wants change at the top of FIFA despite the overnight U-turn.
In its statement, UEFA said, “We cannot keep going on like this with secret schemes on fast track timescales,” and it added that “The current FIFA leadership has not only lost UEFA’s confidence but also that of many other members of the football family.”

The Football Association backed UEFA’s position, saying: “We fully support Uefa’s position. It is time for a full and robust review of FIFA’s leadership and governance to ensure that the global game is run transparently, for the benefit of all 211 member nations.”
Norway’s Football Association president Lise Klaveness said the episode put international football cooperation at risk, and the Dutch FA said the process created a “fundamental breach of trust in the leadership” of Infantino.
FIFA chief operating officer Kevin Lamour said staff were “deceived” by Infantino’s lack of openness in planning the sale and wrote that “It is the project of one person,” as the controversy intensified ahead of FIFA’s March election.
Elections and governance stakes
With FIFA’s private investment plan withdrawn, the fight shifted to governance and leadership ahead of the next FIFA presidential election, with elections scheduled for March 18 and a November 18 deadline for candidates to announce an intention to stand.
““future of global football must always be shaped through proper consultation, collective dialogue and respect for the established governance structures of our game””
The Guardian said UEFA’s statement was “understood to be determined that he should not be permitted to survive a crisis of his own making,” while also noting that Infantino had been expected to be re-elected unopposed for a third full term at next March’s FIFA Congress in Rabat.
CBS News reported that UEFA said it has lost confidence in Infantino and quoted UEFA’s line that “No option should be off the table,” as the plan’s collapse left Infantino facing a potential challenger.
The stakes extended beyond Europe, with the Asian Football Confederation president Sheikh Salman bin Ebrahim Al Khalifa saying the “future of global football must always be shaped through proper consultation, collective dialogue and respect for the established governance structures of our game.”
UEFA also tied its next steps to money already inside FIFA, writing that it must “start to use some of that money that is sat idle in FIFA’s bank account to deliver the kick start that the grassroots and the wider game need in each of the 211 countries of FIFA.”




