
U.S. Senate Banking Committee Advances CLARITY Act After Tillis Alsobrooks Stablecoin Consumer Fight
Key Takeaways
- Senate Banking Committee advanced CLARITY Act with bipartisan support.
- Act would delineate SEC and CFTC authority over digital assets.
- Banks resist expansion, warn risks to real economy and consumer protections.
CLARITY stalls, consumer at center
The U.S. Senate Banking Committee advanced the Digital Asset Market CLARITY Act after months of bipartisan negotiations, but the bill’s progress has left the “average American consumer” caught in political horse-trading, according to Alex Tapscott in CoinDesk’s Crypto Long & Short.
“Crypto Long & Short: What about the American consumer”
Tapscott said the compromise brokered by Senators Thom Tillis (R-NC) and Angela Alsobrooks (D-MD would prevent fintech platforms from treating stablecoins as interest bearing accounts while still permitting them to pay rewards and bonuses.

He tied that legislative fight to consumer costs, citing the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s figure that Americans paid roughly $5.8 billion in overdraft fees in 2023 and saying nearly 80% of fees were concentrated among 9% of accounts.
Tapscott also argued that consumers are asking for CLARITY because many already use stablecoins, describing them as enabling digital dollars to move “as cheaply and seamlessly as a WhatsApp message.”
Banks push back on stablecoins
While the CLARITY Act debate moved forward, BFM reported that the American banking industry opposes the cryptocurrency sector’s expansionist push backed by Donald Trump, warning that the Senate is reviewing another framework bill on cryptocurrencies after a stablecoin law.
BFM said the Senate text was stripped of a stablecoin remuneration clause after lawmakers’ concerns, and it quoted Coinbase head Brian Armstrong writing, "We would rather not have a law at all than a bad text."

In Cryptoast’s coverage of the same fight, Jamie Dimon said, "the government must act with prudence" and warned that if it does not, "that will pose a huge problem".
Cryptoast also described banks as refusing the bill’s approach, stating that “Banks will therefore not accept it as it stands,” and it framed the dispute around yields applicable to stablecoins and rewards tied to stablecoins.
What’s at stake in the vote
As the CLARITY Act heads toward a Senate floor vote, Le Temps said the House of Representatives approved the first U.S. law regulating virtual currencies, with the CLARITY Act now going to the Senate for consideration.
“Bitget App Trade smarter Buy cryptoMarketsTradeFuturesEarnSquareMore Bitget News Hyperliquid Bear Flips Bullish After Losing Over $46M Betting on HYPE Price to Drop Hyperliquid Bear Flips Bullish After Losing Over $46M Betting on HYPE Price to Drop”
Le Temps reported that Republican lawmaker Mike Flood commented on X that, "The CLARITY Act will help usher in the golden age of digital assets," while it also quoted Democratic Representative Maxine Waters reacting on X that, "They give the green light to Trump’s scams and pave the way for the next financial crisis."
CoinDesk’s Crypto Long & Short added that the bill’s outcome matters for consumer protections and market structure, noting that the legislation explicitly prevents stablecoins from being treated as interest bearing accounts while permitting rewards and bonuses.
In the same newsletter, Tapscott argued that stablecoins are among the fastest-growing categories of digital assets and said one in five American adults owns cryptocurrency, adding that Congress should pass CLARITY in its current form to benefit American consumers and preserve American competitiveness.
More on Crypto

Revolut Plans U.S. Bank With FDIC-Insured Accounts, Stablecoins, and Crypto Services
11 sources compared

Ledger Donjon Finds TROPIC01 Chip Vulnerability in Trezor Safe 7, Trezor Says Funds Safe
15 sources compared

Multicoin Capital Co-Founder Kyle Samani Says Web3 Is Dead, Leaving Only DeFi And DePIN
12 sources compared

Galaxy Digital Launches Institutional OTC Prediction Markets Desk With $10M Arca Trade on CLARITY Act
13 sources compared