This is a pattern, not a one-off.
Gilligan has published work that won awards and survived formal scrutiny. He also has a record of corrections, apologies and settlements. Several involve Muslim people and institutions. The record is not clean, and it should not be treated as if it were.
The finding
The record shows a repeated problem.
Gilligan has produced important reporting and won major awards. He also has corrections, upheld complaints, apologies and libel settlements in his record. Several of those cases concern Muslim people and institutions.
We are looking at what he published, what publishers and regulators later did, and what the people named in the reporting said happened to them.
He writes for more than The Spectator.
The Spectator is the biggest archive in this investigation, but it is not the whole story. Gilligan also writes for ConservativeHome, has a verified byline in The Times and is a senior fellow at Policy Exchange.
3
journalism outlets in this audit
70
articles counted across those outlets
1
policy organisation
Journalism
The Spectator
Latest verified item: Simon Woolley is not fit to lead a Cambridge college, 31 Aug 2026.
The 42-row Spectator denominator covers the frozen current window only. The full live writer archive contains 75 rows.
Open author recordJournalism
ConservativeHome
Latest verified item: Andrew Gilligan: Burnham is matching all my expectations – good vibes not great plans, 18 Aug 2026.
The 28-row current-window count comes from all three live author pages and is separate from the Spectator denominator.
Open author recordJournalism
The Times
Latest verified item: North needs decent local rail not a pointless high-speed line, 14 Jan 2026.
One current byline was directly verified. This is not an exhaustive Times byline count.
Open author recordInstitutional output
Policy Exchange
Latest verified item: Islamopopulism Part 2, 10 May 2026.
These are institutional publications and blogs, not newspaper articles, and never enter the Spectator denominator.
Open author recordHis Policy Exchange work
A separate part of Gilligan's current output
Gilligan is a senior fellow at Policy Exchange. We found 9 publications and blog posts in the same period. They are not Spectator articles. 7 concern Muslim-related subjects, based on their official titles and summaries.
- Islamopopulism Part 2Muslim-related
The official title and summary concern Muslim independent councillors and a claimed Muslim populist movement.
- Understanding IslamopopulismMuslim-related
The official title and summary concern the political and social views of British Muslims.
- Curate’s EggMuslim-related
The official summary centres on the government's proposed response to anti-Muslim hostility.
- A False CompromiseMuslim-related
The official title and summary concern definitions of Islamophobia and anti-Muslim hostility.
- The Islamophobia Definition ObservatoryMuslim-related
The official title and summary concern attempts to establish a definition of Islamophobia.
- Instead of high-speed railOther topic
The official title and summary concern Northern Powerhouse Rail and transport policy.
- Bad Faith ActorMuslim-related
The official summary concerns the Centre for Media Monitoring and its work on reporting about Muslims and Islamophobia.
- How Not to Tackle Grooming GangsMuslim-related
The official summary centres on grooming gangs and accusations or definitions of Islamophobia.
- The Local Elections: A Clarifying Moment - Or Not?Other topic
The official title and summary concern the Conservative Party's local-election performance.
Forty-two articles, all listed.
This is not a selected pile of examples. It is every article we recovered from Gilligan's Spectator archive in the current window, frozen on 31 August 2026. You can search it, filter it and download it.
42
articles in denominator
39
coded adverse
12
Muslim-related target or subject
1
Black person targets
Showing 42 of 42 articles
| Date | Article and target | Group code | Stance | Register |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 Jun 2025 | Why won’t TfL staff stop fare dodgers? Transport for London management. Primary target coded as TfL management rather than Robert Jenrick because the standfirst says the wider argument is about Sadiq Khan and TfL management after the video hook. | Not applicable No identity descriptor asserted | Adverse | Attack or opinion |
| 9 Jul 2025 | Miqdaad Versi and the troubling war on ‘Islamophobia’ Miqdaad Versi. Target kept on Versi because he is named in the headline, even though the piece also attacks the wider anti-Islamophobia press-corrections campaign. | Muslim-related subject | Adverse | Attack or opinion |
| 15 Sept 2025 | It’s time to admit that high-speed rail is a dead end Northern Powerhouse Rail. The headline frames the project itself as the dead end, so the target is the rail scheme rather than one minister. | Not applicable No identity descriptor asserted | Adverse | Policy argument |
| 2 Jan 2026 | The real Alaa Abd el-Fattah scandal British state handling of extremist-linked actors. Ambiguous: the headline names Alaa Abd el-Fattah, but the standfirst says the “real scandal” is the British state repeatedly legitimising extremists, so the coding follows the reframed institutional target. | Not applicable No identity descriptor asserted | Adverse | Other |
| 18 Feb 2026 | Revealed: David Lammy’s curious relationship with Guyanese Big Oil David Lammy. Investigative register because the headline is a reveal and the standfirst presents newly surfaced external-role material. | No identity documented No identity descriptor asserted | Adverse | Investigation |
| 6 Mar 2026 | The good and bad news about Labour’s leaked social cohesion strategy Labour social cohesion strategy. Mixed stance because both the headline and standfirst explicitly divide the piece into good and bad news. | Muslim-related subject | Mixed | Policy argument |
| 10 Mar 2026 | This ‘anti-Muslim hostility’ definition is truly sinister Official anti-Muslim hostility definition. The target is the official definition itself, and the article argues directly against it. | Muslim-related subject | Adverse | Policy argument |
| 18 Mar 2026 | All the worst people like the ‘anti-Muslim hostility’ definition Official anti-Muslim hostility definition. The named target is still the definition because the article uses supporters as evidence against it. | Muslim-related subject | Adverse | Attack or opinion |
| 26 Mar 2026 | What Hope not Hate doesn’t understand about liberal values Hope not Hate. The piece is framed against Hope not Hate’s investigation and values language, so the organisation is the primary target. | Not applicable No identity descriptor asserted | Adverse | Attack or opinion |
| 2 Apr 2026 | What we get wrong about extremism Current extremism policy framework. Policy target chosen because the headline is general and the standfirst compares competing official approaches to extremism. | Not applicable No identity descriptor asserted | Adverse | Policy argument |
| 12 Apr 2026 | The trouble with the Green party’s Ifhat Shaheen Ifhat Shaheen. The named candidate is the target; no race or religion code is asserted here because the frozen evidence does not explicitly supply one. | No identity documented No identity descriptor asserted | Adverse | Investigation |
| 15 Apr 2026 | The hateful posts of yet another Green party candidate Green party candidate profiled in the piece. Ambiguous: the available frozen row does not preserve the candidate’s name in the headline, so the row is coded to the unnamed candidate described in the standfirst rather than to the party in the abstract. | No identity documented No identity descriptor asserted | Adverse | Investigation |
| 17 Apr 2026 | Why is this Green candidate sharing an anti-semitic post? Sabine Mairey. The target is the named Green candidate; the identity-linked subject is documented explicitly in the article wording. | Jewish-related subject | Adverse | Investigation |
| 21 Apr 2026 | Meet the Green candidate who thinks Zionists killed 20 million Christians Feda Shahin. The article targets the named candidate, while the identity-linked descriptor evidence is the explicit reference to Christians. | Jewish-related subjectChristian-related subject | Adverse | Investigation |
| 23 Apr 2026 | The Green party candidate who wants to ‘burn Zionism to the ground’ Rebecca Jones. The target is the named candidate. The Jewish-related code records the headline's explicit political subject, not her identity. | Jewish-related subject | Adverse | Investigation |
| 29 Apr 2026 | March of the Greenshirts: Polanski’s party are the real racists Green party. The target is the party because the headline generalises from candidate examples to Polanski’s party as a whole. | Jewish-related subject | Adverse | Attack or opinion |
| 1 May 2026 | The Greens are facing a reckoning Green party. This is a follow-up assessment of what the earlier revelations mean for the party. | Jewish-related subject | Adverse | Other |
| 5 May 2026 | The Green candidate who thinks Iran should bomb the White House Feda Shahin. The article targets the named candidate; the explicit descriptor evidence is the preserved Israel wording. | Israel-related subject | Adverse | Investigation |
| 6 May 2026 | This Green candidate thinks the UK is a ‘terrorist state’ Marc Batchford. The row stays on the named candidate rather than the party in the abstract. | Jewish-related subjectIsrael-related subject | Adverse | Investigation |
| 9 May 2026 | What will the Green party do with its new racist councillors? Green party. The councillor is the case study, but the headline asks what the party will do, so the party is the coded target. | Jewish-related subject | Adverse | Report |
| 10 May 2026 | Did antisemitism cost the Greens at the local elections? Green party. This is an elections-consequences assessment rather than a fresh exposé. | Jewish-related subject | Adverse | Other |
| 11 May 2026 | The disturbing truth about Britain’s Islamopopulism movement Britain’s Islamopopulism movement. Movement coded as the target because the piece asks what the wider political current represents. | Muslim-related subject | Adverse | Other |
| 16 May 2026 | How the wheels came off the Brexit bus Brexit project symbolism. Ambiguous: the piece uses the broken campaign bus as a proxy for Brexit’s condition, with both nostalgic and critical cues, so it is coded as mixed-stance profile rather than a narrow vehicle story. | Not applicable No identity descriptor asserted | Mixed | Profile |
| 22 May 2026 | Burnham’s buses show why he will probably fail as prime minister Andy Burnham. Burnham is named and evaluated directly in the headline; the bus policy is evidence inside that critique. | No identity documented No identity descriptor asserted | Adverse | Attack or opinion |
| 27 May 2026 | How the Manchester media failed to scrutinise Andy Burnham Manchester media. Ambiguous: the piece is also about Andy Burnham, but the headline frames the failure as the Manchester media’s failure to scrutinise him, so the media ecosystem is the coded target. | Not applicable No identity descriptor asserted | Adverse | Attack or opinion |
| 5 Jun 2026 | The disturbing truth about the National Association of Muslim Police National Association of Muslim Police. The organisation is explicitly described as Muslim in its title, so muslim_institution is documented without inferring any individual’s faith. | Muslim institution | Adverse | Investigation |
| 6 Jun 2026 | Did Haringey’s new Labour leader once defend Jihadi John? Ibrahim Ali. The Labour party context matters, but the headline is a question about the named leader’s past record. | No identity documented No identity descriptor asserted | Adverse | Investigation |
| 9 Jun 2026 | Meet the Green councillor who demanded ‘heads on sticks’ Green councillor profiled in the piece. The councillor is the target; no race or religion descriptor is asserted because the preserved evidence does not explicitly provide one. | No identity documented No identity descriptor asserted | Adverse | Investigation |
| 11 Jun 2026 | Will Labour suspend the National Association of Muslim Police? National Association of Muslim Police. News register because the headline turns on the fresh suspension question after the earlier revelations. | Muslim institution | Adverse | Report |
| 13 Jun 2026 | The Muslim Council of Britain is losing relevance Muslim Council of Britain. The piece judges the organisation’s current relevance and internal election weakness. | Muslim institution | Adverse | Other |
| 7 Jul 2026 | The Green party councillor being investigated by the GMC Rebecca Jones. The article follows the regulatory consequence for a named councillor; no current-enum identity code is explicitly supported by the preserved evidence. | No identity documented No identity descriptor asserted | Adverse | Investigation |
| 16 Jul 2026 | Green council plots to ‘resist’ immigration raids Lewisham Green council. Institutional target chosen because the headline is about an official council plan, not only about an activist group. | Migrant-related subject | Adverse | Investigation |
| 20 Jul 2026 | Burnham cannot allow Ali Milani near power Ali Milani. Ambiguous: the headline addresses Burnham’s decision-making, but the article’s substantive exposé is about Ali Milani’s record, so the row is coded to Milani as the primary target. | Jewish-related subject | Adverse | Investigation |
| 23 Jul 2026 | Burnham isn’t being honest about his bus fare cap Andy Burnham. The headline frames the issue as Burnham’s honesty, so the person rather than the transport policy is the main target. | No identity documented No identity descriptor asserted | Adverse | Attack or opinion |
| 4 Aug 2026 | Rod Liddle was the most exciting boss I ever had Rod Liddle. This is a first-person remembrance piece rather than an attack article, so it is the one favourable row in the window. | No identity documented No identity descriptor asserted | Favourable | Profile |
| 11 Aug 2026 | Meet Farah Ahmed, Jason Arday’s colleague Farah Ahmed. muslim_subject is used because the linked public profile explicitly documents the Islamic-education subject matter without requiring an inference about private belief. | Muslim-related subject | Adverse | Investigation |
| 15 Aug 2026 | Why is Cambridge platforming Islamic creationism? Cambridge-hosted academic project on Islamic creationism. The project, not Cambridge in the abstract, is the immediate target because the headline focuses on what Cambridge is platforming. | Muslim-related subject | Adverse | Investigation |
| 18 Aug 2026 | Cambridge University-linked project erases Israel Cambridge-linked Islamic curriculum project. The project is the immediate target. Its Islamic-education context and the headline's explicit Israel reference are recorded as subject matter only. | Muslim-related subjectIsrael-related subject | Adverse | Investigation |
| 20 Aug 2026 | The trouble with Cambridge’s education faculty goes all the way to the top Hilary Cremin and Cambridge education faculty leadership. The standfirst names faculty head Hilary Cremin and the department she runs. No race or religion descriptor is asserted in this dataset. | No identity documented No identity descriptor asserted | Adverse | Attack or opinion |
| 25 Aug 2026 | Cambridge’s Farah Ahmed: study engineering ‘to produce weaponry for Jihad’ Farah Ahmed. The 2002 pamphlet is real and Gilligan published scans naming Ahmed as a co-author. Cambridge disputed that she wrote the quoted passages and described her role as historical research. The material was 24 years old, and Gilligan's 11 August article recorded Ahmed's 2010 statement that she had left Hizb ut-Tahrir some years earlier. Group coding follows subject matter, not an inference about private belief. | Muslim-related subject | Adverse | Investigation |
| 26 Aug 2026 | Middle East Eye seems to get stupider and stupider Middle East Eye. The headline supplies the register. The target is a publication, so this dataset does not infer a race or religion for it. | Not applicable No identity descriptor asserted | Adverse | Ridicule |
| 31 Aug 2026 | Simon Woolley is not fit to lead a Cambridge college Simon Woolley. The headline is a direct judgment about Simon Woolley’s fitness for office; Jason Arday is context rather than the primary target. | Black person | Adverse | Attack or opinion |
We use an identity label only when a public source supports it. “Muslim-related subject” describes the subject of an article, not a named person's faith. “Adverse” and “ridicule” describe the article's tone, not whether every claim in it is true or false.
Seven Cambridge articles in 21 days.
Between 11 and 31 August, Gilligan published seven articles about Cambridge, Arday's faculty and people associated with it. Four concerned Muslim-related education subjects. The last said a Black college head was unfit to lead.
- 01Meet Farah Ahmed, Jason Arday's colleague
The article presents Ahmed's appointment and earlier published arguments as evidence that Cambridge's education faculty had wider problems.
Muslim-related subjectInvestigation - 02Why is Cambridge platforming Islamic creationism?
The article alleges that the Cambridge-linked education platform promoted creationism and resistance to evolutionary science.
Muslim-related subjectInvestigation - 03Cambridge University-linked project erases Israel
The article alleges that materials promoted by the Cambridge-linked platform misrepresented Hamas, the hostages and Israel.
Muslim-related subjectIsrael-related subjectInvestigation - 04The trouble with Cambridge's education faculty goes all the way to the top
The article attacks the faculty head's published arguments and management. No race or religion descriptor is asserted in this dataset.
No identity documentedAttack or opinion - 05Cambridge's Farah Ahmed: study engineering 'to produce weaponry for Jihad'
The 2002 pamphlet is real and Gilligan published scans naming Ahmed as a co-author. Cambridge disputed that she wrote the quoted passages and described her role as historical research. The material was 24 years old, and Gilligan's 11 August article recorded Ahmed's 2010 statement that she had left Hizb ut-Tahrir some years earlier.
Muslim-related subjectInvestigation - 06Middle East Eye seems to get stupider and stupider
The headline supplies the register. The target is a publication, so this dataset does not infer a race or religion for it.
Not applicableRidicule - 07Simon Woolley is not fit to lead a Cambridge college
The headline declares Woolley unfit for his post and the article attacks his vigil speech, qualifications and record.
Black personAttack or opinion
One point Gilligan got right
The official biography did contain an error.
Homerton's “create and lead” wording is inaccurate. Official records show the Unit existed before Woolley's appointment, Marcus Bell directed it from 2016, and Woolley chaired its advisory group from 2018 to 2020.
What that error did not prove
It did not show that Woolley was unfit to lead Homerton.
Official records also credit Woolley with a formative role. He said ideas discussed with Theresa May became government policy, and a 2026 government publication says he was appointed to create and lead the Race Disparity Audit Advisory Group. The Unit and its advisory group are not the same body. “Not fit” remains Gilligan's opinion, not a formal finding.
Corrections and awards belong in the same account.
Gilligan's defenders point to his awards and cleared complaints. His critics point to corrections, apologies and settlements. This ledger shows both, with links to the source for every outcome.
24
documented record rows
11
adverse outcomes
13
favourable outcomes
7
adverse, Muslim-related
Record A
Corrections, findings and settlements
The Iraq dossier and the 45-minute claim
BBC Radio 4 / Mail on Sunday / Hutton Inquiry
Hutton found the allegation that government probably knew the claim was wrong to be unfounded and said Gilligan's key allegations had not been made by Dr David Kelly.
Boundary: Later Butler and Chilcot criticism of the dossier does not formally reverse Hutton's finding on Gilligan's wording.
Open cited recordLutfur Rahman and undeclared-donation or fraud claims
Daily Telegraph website / Press Complaints Commission
A contemporaneous report says the PCC concluded two Gilligan blog posts were misleading.
Boundary: The original PCC adjudication page was not recovered, so this row remains explicitly secondary-source only.
Open cited recordMohammed Kozbar and Finsbury Park Mosque
Sunday Telegraph / IPSO
IPSO records a mediated correction; it did not issue a breach adjudication.
Boundary: This was a mediated resolution and correction, not an IPSO finding that the Editors' Code was breached.
Open cited recordPoplar Town Hall sale and planning permission
Daily Telegraph / Sunday Telegraph / Publisher settlement
The publisher accepted that its suggestion that Islam willingly benefited from corruption was untrue and agreed damages and costs.
Boundary: This was a publisher settlement, not a court judgment against Gilligan, and no personal faith is inferred from the claimant's name.
Open cited recordPrevent Watch article
Sunday Telegraph / Publisher settlement
The publisher apologised for wrongly presenting Smith as a Muslim Brotherhood-linked activist and paid compensation.
Boundary: This was a publisher settlement, not a judicial determination against Gilligan.
Open cited recordCasey review and segregation framing
Sunday Times / Publisher correction
The correction said the survey concerned Asian people and did not ask pupils to estimate the Muslim population.
Boundary: The publisher correction records its own corrected wording; it is not a court finding.
Open cited recordPrevent Watch article
Sunday Telegraph / Publisher settlement
The apology accepted that Ahmed was not an extremist and that his BBC interview had been in good faith.
Boundary: This was a publisher settlement with an apology and payment, not a court judgment against Gilligan.
Open cited recordNasim Ashraf and Hafizan Zaman
Sunday Times / Times Newspapers / Publisher settlement
Times Newspapers settled the claims on undisclosed terms. The Times apologised over Melanie Phillips's column. The Sunday Times, which had published Gilligan's news report, amended its online coverage and printed a clarificatory statement that accepted an error; the source does not describe that statement as an apology.
Boundary: This was an agreed settlement described by the claimants' lawyers, not a trial judgment against Gilligan. The Times apology and the Sunday Times clarification must not be collapsed into one outcome.
Open cited recordMohammed Kozbar and Finsbury Park Mosque
Sunday Telegraph / Publisher settlement
The publisher apologised, removed the article and agreed damages and costs.
Boundary: This was a publisher settlement following an earlier correction, not a court judgment against Gilligan.
Open cited recordTrans women and access to women's facilities
Sunday Times / IPSO
IPSO found a Clause 1 breach and required the offered corrective action.
Boundary: The finding applies to the identified Sunday Times article and the misleading claim IPSO considered.
Open cited recordEnfield council 'clan' allegation
Sunday Times / Times Newspapers / Publisher settlement
The publisher apologised, corrected the report and made a financial payment.
Boundary: This was an agreed publisher settlement reported by the claimant's lawyers, not a court judgment against Gilligan.
Open cited recordRecord B
Clearances, awards and work that held
Sale of illegal landmines
BBC Radio 4 / Amnesty International UK
Amnesty's archive lists Gilligan as the 2003 radio winner.
Boundary: An award records professional recognition; it is not a formal finding that every underlying claim was correct.
Open cited recordCity Hall, Lee Jasper and Ken Livingstone investigations
Evening Standard / British Press Awards
The winners list names Gilligan as Journalist of the Year.
Boundary: The award does not establish that every later corruption implication about Lee Jasper was sustained by subsequent reviews.
Open cited recordLee Jasper and City Hall
Evening Standard / Private Eye Paul Foot Award
The award archive names Gilligan as a runner-up for the Lee Jasper investigation.
Boundary: Runner-up status is professional recognition, not a regulatory or judicial vindication of every allegation.
Open cited recordBritain's Islamic Republic
Channel 4 Dispatches / Ofcom
Ofcom did not uphold the standards complaints it investigated about the programme.
Boundary: The clearance applies to the programme and the complaints Ofcom considered, not to every Gilligan article on related subjects.
Open cited recordBritain's Islamic Republic
Channel 4 Dispatches / Ofcom
Ofcom did not uphold the fairness and privacy complaint it investigated.
Boundary: This is a decision on Miah's fairness and privacy complaint, separate from Ofcom's standards ruling on the programme.
Open cited recordTower Hamlets and alleged fundamentalist infiltration
Sunday Telegraph / Channel 4 / Private Eye Paul Foot Award
The Paul Foot archive highly commends Gilligan's reporting.
Boundary: A highly commended citation is recognition of the work, not a regulator's ruling on every claim in the portfolio.
Open cited recordLondon politics reporting portfolio
Sunday Telegraph / Guardian / Spectator / Channel 4 / The Orwell Foundation
The Orwell Foundation preserves Gilligan's longlisted portfolio.
Boundary: Longlisting records professional recognition and is not an accuracy adjudication.
Open cited recordReporting including Tower Hamlets investigations
Sunday Telegraph / Society of Editors Press Awards
A trade report lists Gilligan on the News Reporter of the Year shortlist.
Boundary: A shortlist is industry recognition, not a formal ruling on the accuracy of each article entered.
Open cited recordLocal investigations
Daily Telegraph / Sunday Telegraph / British Journalism Awards
A trade report records Gilligan as highly commended in the Local Heroes category.
Boundary: The commendation is professional recognition and does not determine the truth of every underlying allegation.
Open cited recordClaims in Ken Livingstone's autobiography about Gilligan's City Hall reporting
Faber & Faber / Settlement and statement in open court
Faber apologised, agreed damages and amended the paperback after the book said Gilligan had published lies and had been shown the door by the Evening Standard.
Boundary: This was a settlement in Gilligan's favour, not a trial judgment validating every part of his City Hall reporting.
Open cited recordPublication of emails concerning Coe and Gilligan Ltd
Evening Standard / Associated Newspapers / High Court
Tugendhat J dismissed the claim, found no misuse of information in which Abbey had a reasonable expectation of privacy, and said the publication was in the public interest if that point needed decision.
Boundary: The judgment concerns this confidence and privacy claim; it is not a blanket judicial endorsement of Gilligan's wider City Hall corpus.
Open cited recordPrevent Watch, Ifhat Smith and Haras Ahmed
Sunday Telegraph / IPSO
IPSO did not uphold the complaint it investigated about the article.
Boundary: The no-breach decision and the later private settlements are separate outcomes and must both be shown.
Open cited recordMermaids, Gendered Intelligence and trans-health reporting
Sunday Times / IPSO
IPSO did not uphold the complaints it investigated about the two articles.
Boundary: The no-breach finding applies to the two articles and complaints IPSO considered, not to all trans-related reporting.
Open cited recordThese are record rows, not unique cases or articles. Some underlying works produced multiple outcomes, and seven favourable rows are awards or recognition rather than adjudications. The seven settlement rows divide into six adverse publisher settlements and one settlement in Gilligan's favour.
Four cases that need more than a headline
The details matter.
These cases are often used to tell a simple story about Gilligan. The cards set out what was upheld, what was narrowed and what remains unproven.
Iraq dossier, 2003 to 2016
Hutton rejected Gilligan's wording. Later inquiries found the dossier overstated the intelligence.
Lord Hutton rejected Gilligan's central broadcast allegation. Later, the Butler and Chilcot inquiries found that the government had presented the intelligence with more certainty than it justified. That supports Gilligan's broader concern about the dossier. It did not reverse Hutton's finding on his specific wording.
Tower Hamlets, 2015 and 2022
The Election Court upheld the main corruption case, not every claim in the wider coverage.
In 2015, the Election Court voided Lutfur Rahman's mayoral election. It found Rahman personally guilty, and his agents guilty, of corrupt and illegal practices, and accepted Gilligan's evidence about false registrations. That vindicates the central corruption case, not every surrounding allegation in Gilligan's wider Tower Hamlets reporting. Rahman's return as mayor in 2022 did not reverse the judgment.
Lee Jasper and City Hall, 2008 to 2012
The City Hall investigation had consequences. It did not prove personal corruption by Lee Jasper.
Lee Jasper resigned during Gilligan's award-winning City Hall campaign. The LDA review said it had found no evidence of fraud, corruption or collusion, and no impropriety in Jasper's role in the projects it examined. A later review found no widespread outside interference, and the Evening Standard reported in 2012 that Jasper was not facing charges. There were still grant and governance failures. But the 2026 Woolley article cannot treat personal corruption by Jasper as proved fact.
Farah Ahmed, August 2026
The pamphlet is real. What Ahmed wrote, and when, are disputed issues.
The 2002 pamphlet exists, and Gilligan published scans naming Farah Ahmed as a co-author. Authorship is disputed: Cambridge says she did not write the quoted passages and that her contribution was historical research. The words were 24 years old when Gilligan published his 2026 articles. His 11 August article also recorded Ahmed's 2010 statement that she had left Hizb ut-Tahrir years earlier and did not agree with all of its views. Those facts need to be read together.
What people said happened after publication.
Four people named in this reporting described personal or reputational harm. Their accounts sit beside the later corrections, apologies and settlements by publishers.
Poplar Town Hall reporting
Mujibul Islam
“my community had turned against me”
Mujibul Islam, quoted after the Telegraph's apology and settlement
Islam said the coverage caused embarrassment and distress, that his community had turned against him, and that his Labour Party membership had been withdrawn.
Boundary: This is Islam's account of the effect on him. It is not a judicial assessment of damages or of Gilligan's intent.
Read the attributed accountOldham 'Trojan Horse' reporting
Nasim Ashraf and Hafizan Zaman
“a distressing and stressful period”
Nasim Ashraf, in the claimants' barristers' settlement notice
Ashraf described the 18-month dispute as distressing and stressful. Times Newspapers was the sixth publisher to settle; the other five publishers' outcomes concerned separate articles, and this ledger attributes only the Sunday Times report to Gilligan.
Boundary: The notice is a claimant-side account of agreed settlements. It is not a trial judgment against Gilligan or every publisher involved.
Read the attributed accountFinsbury Park Mosque reporting
Mohammed Kozbar
“no option but to bring these proceedings”
Kozbar's solicitor, in a statement read in open court
Kozbar's solicitor said the publisher had never contacted him before saying he declined to comment, and that Kozbar brought proceedings to clear his name and those of his mosque and community.
Boundary: The statement reports the settlement and an earlier judicial ruling on defamatory meaning. The truth defence was not decided at a full trial.
Read the attributed accountThese are accounts from four named people about what happened after publication. In each case, a publisher later corrected, apologised or settled. The evidence does not show how widely each article travelled, what Gilligan intended or what happened to every person in the corpus. As of 1 September 2026, we found no correction, ruling, settlement or documented effect linked to the 31 August Woolley article.
Every number on this page can be checked.
The article list is published. Each identity label has a source. Each outcome has a link and a plain description of what it does, and does not, establish.
How we checked the record
- 1. Count the articles, then freeze the list. We checked the live writer pages, article filters, spectator.co.uk redirects and the news sitemap, then merged duplicate URLs. The list covers 3 June 2025 to 31 August 2026.
- 2. Keep outlets separate. We counted ConservativeHome and Policy Exchange separately. The Times figure is one directly verified byline, not a full Times count.
- 3. Use public evidence for identity labels. We code race or religion only when a public source provides that description. An article about Muslims does not prove a named person is Muslim.
- 4. Do not confuse tone with truth. “Adverse” and “ridicule” describe how an article is written. They do not decide whether every claim is true. Outcomes such as corrections and awards sit in a separate ledger.
- 5. Keep legal outcomes distinct. Corrections, rulings, settlements, court judgments, clearances and awards are different things. We do not treat one as proof of another.