The Independent, on Iran, 5 November 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

Tanker struck by projectiles in the Persian Gulf off Qatar, and other Mideast news

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.1 finding

Become an Independent member to bookmark this article Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Membership today. Join today Already a member? Log in A tanker was struck by projectiles off the coast of Qatar in the Persian Gulf , the British military said Thursday, while Iranian state television reported that two tankers and a towboat had hit mines in the Strait of Hormuz . Here is the latest news from the Middle East on Thursday.

Read our full coverage here. Tanker struck in Persian Gulf A tanker was struck by two projectiles off Qatar’s coast in the Persian Gulf on Wednesday, the British military said, adding that the status of the crew was unconfirmed. The United Kingdom Maritime Trade Operations Center said the attack took place 50 nautical miles (57 miles; 92 kilometers) north of Qatar’s city of Madinat ash Shamal. It did not identify the tanker or which country’s flag it was sailing under.

There was no immediate claim of responsibility for the attack. It also said the extent of the damage and any environmental impact were unknown. UKMTO said in a report last month that it was “struggling to accurately report” the true number of attacks as the majority of ships now refuse to report them. South Korea’s military proposes expanding anti-piracy mission South Korea’s military has proposed expanding the operational area of an anti-piracy naval unit deployed near Somalia to include waters south of Oman, saying that the conflicts in the Middle East have led to increased pirate activity.

Defense Ministry spokesperson Chung Binna said Thursday that the possible expansion of the Cheonghae unit’s mission would not involve South Korea in the U.S. war with Iran. She stressed that South Korea would not directly participate in military operations to ensure freedom of navigation near the Strait of Hormuz unless “allowable circumstances” were created, describing those conditions as an end to the war with Iran or an agreement to stop the fighting.

Under the military’s proposal, the South Korean operational area would be expanded to include waters south of Oman, with its farthest point near the port of Duqm, more than 650 kilometers (403 miles) from the Strait of Hormuz. The unit would also receive additional equipment and personnel, including patrol aircraft and an explosive ordnance disposal team, Chung said. The changes would require approval from President Lee Jae Myung and the country’s legislature.

Iranian state TV says 3 ships have struck naval mines Iran’s state TV said Thursday that two oil tankers and a towboat caught fire after striking mines in the Strait of Hormuz. It did not provide details about possible casualties or the vessels' flags. Quoting a statement by the Revolutionary Guard, the report said the Guard also seized two U.S. drones in the airspace over the strait. The Guard routinely makes similar statements about targeting vessels as well as damaging oil tankers in the strait.

Tehran closed the strait, through which some 20% of the world’s oil supply passed during peacetime, after the U.S. and Israel attacked Iran in February, launching the war. ___ This report will be updated throughout the day as new developments emerge.

Read the original article on independent.co.uk (opens in a new tab)
What we found (1)

The Independent runs an AP roundup that attributes each claim to its source, refuses to assign blame for the tanker attack, and says plainly that the US and Israel attacked Iran in February. Its one lapse is minor. It adds an 'could not be independently verified' caveat only to the Iranian state TV report, while the British military's account of a separate attack carries no such caveat.

  1. Uneven scepticism between sources

    Minor

    “The claim could not be independently verified.”

    Why this matters
    The Independent attaches a verification caveat to the Iranian state TV report that three ships hit mines.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes the Iranian account as less trustworthy than the British military's account of the tanker attack off Qatar.
    The context
    The British military's report is also unverified. It did not identify the tanker, its flag or the crew's status, yet it carries no verification caveat. Both reports are attributed claims from a party to the region's tensions, but only the Iranian one is marked as doubtful.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“the British military said, adding that the status of the crew was unconfirmed”
    • Elsewhere in the article“It did not identify the tanker”

    Show it in the article

What it gets right

  • “after the U.S. and Israel attacked Iran in February, launching the war”

    It names who started the war in the active voice, rather than presenting Iran's closure of the strait as an unprovoked act.

  • “There was no immediate claim of responsibility for the attack.”

    It does not pin the tanker attack on any party without evidence.

  • “the British military said Thursday, while Iranian state television reported”

    Each account is attributed to its source, so neither is passed off as established fact.

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The Independent

  1. 4 NovTrump doubles down on Iran War being worth losing House and Senate7.3
  2. 4 NovTrump makes Iran war admission while signing ballroom beam0.0
  3. 4 NovTrump makes Iran war admission while signing ballroom beam0.0
  4. 4 NovBurnham says ‘world has an opportunity’ to resolve Iran war after Trump US midterms disaster0.0
  5. 4 NovIran gloats over Donald Trump's midterm rout, claiming Americans said no to war0.0

Everything we scored from The Independent