The Independent, on Iran, 26 October 2026

The Independent's wire report on the Tehran talks gives Iran's foreign ministry real space and reports both Netanyahu's threat and the Channel 12 story about his clash with the army. But in its own voice it calls the Houthis 'Iranian-backed' and repeats 'its proxies' where other outlets covering the same day wrote 'Iran-aligned', and it labels Iranian leaders 'defiant' while describing Israeli and American leaders as sharpening their threats.

Minor

out of 10

What we found

Uses a loaded word
Minor
“Iranian-backed Houthi rebels”
What the words do
The Independent attaches 'Iranian-backed' to the Houthis in its own voice, as a settled description rather than a sourced claim.
What a reader comes away believing
That the Houthis act on Iran's funding and direction as an established fact.
What is actually the case
Reuters copy on the same meeting the same morning described them as 'Iran-aligned', a weaker and sourced formulation, and the article attaches no source to 'Iranian-backed'.
How we know
- Al-Monitor reported“attacks by Yemen's Iran-alignedHouthis have spiralled over recent weeks”Officials from Mecca pact countries to meet Iranian officials in Tehran on Monday (opens in a new tab)
- The Jerusalem Post reported“escalating attacks from Yemen's Iran-aligned Houthis”Top officials from Mecca pact countries to meet Iranian officials in Tehran, two sources say (opens in a new tab)
Show it in the article
“Iran or its proxies”
What the words do
The Independent writes Netanyahu's claim into its own narration using 'its proxies', flattening named armed groups into instruments of Tehran.
What a reader comes away believing
That armed groups across the region are Iran's tools, acting on its orders.
What is actually the case
The same-day coverage names the Houthis and calls them Iran-aligned rather than proxies; nothing in the article names any group or evidences command from Tehran beyond Netanyahu 'citing intelligence'.
How we know
- The Jerusalem Post reported“Yemen's Iran-aligned Houthis”Top officials from Mecca pact countries to meet Iranian officials in Tehran, two sources say (opens in a new tab)
Show it in the article
Uses a loaded word
Minor
“while Iranian leaders have remained defiant”
What the words do
The Independent sets Israeli and American leaders 'sharpening their threats' against Iranian leaders being 'defiant', a verdict word applied to one side only.
What a reader comes away believing
That Iran's posture is stubbornness rather than a stated position.
What is actually the case
The article's own reporting of Iran's position is that its spokesperson said the window of diplomacy was not closed and messages were being passed via intermediaries.
How we know
- Elsewhere in the article“Tehran had not closed the window of diplomacy”
Show it in the article

Every underline is part of a finding. Press one to see why.

Delegations meeting in Tehran with region on edge over potential for renewed fighting

Become an Independent member to bookmark this article Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Membership today. Join today Already a member? Log in High-level delegations from Saudi Arabia , Pakistan and Turkey were in Tehran on Monday for meetings with Iranian authorities to try to avert renewed fighting between Iran and Israel and the United States, two regional officials said. The talks come as many in Iran are girding themselves for the possible return to a return to all-out war, as Israeli and American leaders have been sharpening their threats ahead of pending elections in both countries, while Iranian leaders have remained defiant. Saudi Defense Minister Khalid bin Salman, Pakistan army chief Field Marshal Asim Munir and the head of Turkey’s intelligence service were to meet with Iran’s top security officials and negotiators to push for a deal between Tehran and Washington. The war in Yemen and strikes by Iranian-backed Houthi rebels against Saudi Arabia were topics also on the table, said the officials who spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak to reporters. An Iranian official, also speaking on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to speak to reporters, confirmed the arrival of the officials. Saudi Arabia said in a statement that the delegations hoped to find “ways to de-escalate tensions, enhance regional security and promote its stability.” With worries about renewed fighting ahead of Israel's election on Tuesday and the Nov. 3 elections in the United States, Iran's Foreign Ministry spokesperson, Esmail Baghaei, on the weekend said Tehran had not closed the window of diplomacy and that messages were being passed to the U.S. via intermediaries. With negotiations long stalled, Baghaei said that the U.S. appears to be persisting in unilateral demands and that Trump and U.S. officials repeatedly use the phrase “complete surrender,” which Baghaei said no Iranian accepts. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu , meantime, repeated his warning on Sunday that Iran or its proxies could attack ahead of the close elections to disrupt the vote, citing intelligence. “The (military) is ready both to defend and to strike,” he said in a video statement, adding: “You will suffer disproportionate blows far greater than you can imagine.” Israel’s Channel 12 reported Sunday night that Netanyahu and his military chief of staff clashed over an instruction by Netanyahu to carry out an “action” that the army believes could quickly trigger a resumption of the conflict with Iran. Netanyahu described the Channel 12 report as nonsense during an appearance on another broadcaster, Channel 14. There was no immediate military comment. ___ AP journalists Victoria Eastwood in Cairo, Natalie Melzer in Tel Aviv, Israel and David Rising in Bangkok contributed to this story.

Read the original article on independent.co.uk

What it gets right

“Tehran had not closed the window of diplomacy and that messages were being passed to the U.S. via intermediaries”
It gives Iran's own account of the diplomacy in its own words, named to its foreign ministry spokesperson, rather than leaving Iran as a silent object of Israeli and US statements.
“Netanyahu and his military chief of staff clashed over an instruction by Netanyahu to carry out an “action” that the army believes could quickly trigger a resumption of the conflict with Iran”
It reports the Israeli broadcaster's account that Netanyahu pushed for an action his own army feared would restart the war, and names the source for it.
“Saudi Defense Minister Khalid bin Salman, Pakistan army chief Field Marshal Asim Munir and the head of Turkey’s intelligence service”
It names who is actually in the room rather than leaving 'high-level delegations' unexplained.

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The Independent