Arutz Sheva / Israel National News, on Iran, 12 November 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

Middle East expert to Arutz Sheva: If Trump won't strike, Israel must act alone

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.2 findingsSee it marked on israelnationalnews.com

Middle East expert Yoni Ben Menachem, a senior researcher at the Jerusalem Center for Security and Foreign Affairs, told Arutz Sheva-Israel National News that the possibility of remains open, despite President Trump's reservations in recent days. "It's not certain. Trump is a very impulsive person who contradicts himself, sometimes even deliberately. Israeli officials familiar with the negotiations with the Iranians say everything is at a standstill, particularly over the unresolved nuclear issue.

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

The article never says that the US and Israel have already fought a war on Iran and that the question is whether to restart it. Other coverage of the same days reports Trump steering away from restarting that war while peace talks continue. Without this, a reader of "the military option is on the table" may take it as a first strike, not a resumption of a war Trump is resisting.

How we know

As long as that issue remains unresolved, the military option is on the table. "Ultimately, following the defeat suffered by the Republican Party in the midterm elections, Trump will not be willing to accept Iranian humiliation or a diplomatic defeat, especially not in the form of an agreement that would be even worse than the one Obama signed in 2015. "He could decide to strike Iran, or he could back down and leave Israel to deal with the Iranian nuclear threat.

It is extremely important that even if Trump does not launch an attack, Israel acts on its own to destroy Iran's nuclear program or eliminate its leadership. We must not give up on this issue, or we will face an existential threat." Ben Menachem was also asked whether Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu had made the right decision in reaching an agreement with President Trump to gradually phase out American military aid to Israel, given the widespread criticism of the move.

"Netanyahu acted correctly and with careful consideration. He reached an agreement with the President before the midterm elections to gradually reduce the aid. Now that the Democrats control both the House of Representatives and the Senate, they can advance legislation and measures against Israel. "It was good that Israel got ahead of them on the issue of military aid. Otherwise, they would have celebrated it as an achievement, but Netanyahu and Trump effectively pulled the rug out from under them on this issue."

Read the original article on israelnationalnews.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (2)

Arutz Sheva reports an interview in which an Israeli analyst urges Israel to strike Iran alone if Trump will not. The headline and body attribute the call to him clearly. In its own narration the outlet calls Iran's government "the regime in Tehran", and it never tells the reader that the military action under discussion would restart a US and Israeli war on Iran that has already been fought.

  1. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “military action against the regime in Tehran”

    Why this matters
    In its own voice, before the quotation opens, the outlet calls Iran's government "the regime in Tehran".
    The impression it gives
    The reader takes the outlet's verdict on Iran's government, that it is an illegitimate "regime", as plain description.
    The context
    "Regime" is a judgement, not a description. The same outlet calls the other side of the talks "Tehran" without the label elsewhere. A neutral report would say Iran or the Iranian government.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

  2. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    The article never says that the US and Israel have already fought a war on Iran and that the question is whether to restart it. Other coverage of the same days reports Trump steering away from restarting that war while peace talks continue. Without this, a reader of "the military option is on the table" may take it as a first strike, not a resumption of a war Trump is resisting.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

What it gets right

  • “Middle East expert to Arutz Sheva:”

    The headline credits the call for Israel to act alone to the interviewee, not to the outlet. It does not present his view as fact.

  • “given the widespread criticism of the move”

    The outlet tells the reader that the aid agreement was widely criticised, so the interviewee's praise of Netanyahu's decision is not left as the only view.

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Arutz Sheva / Israel National News

  1. 12 NovReport: Vance weighing direct meeting with senior Iranian official0.0
  2. 11 NovUS CENTCOM: Nearly 150 ships turned away as naval blockade of Iran continues3.0
  3. 11 NovInstead of war with Iran: Ex-Mossad chief's proposal3.0
  4. 11 NovReport: Iran still has 1,700 ballistic missiles, produces 50 monthly0.0
  5. 10 NovSecond UK air base sees US aircraft evacuation amid Iranian threat3.0

Everything we scored from Arutz Sheva / Israel National News