Al Arabiya English, on Iran, 14 November 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

Trump tells advisers he may hold off on Iran attacks barring new provocations, sources say

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.2 findingsSee it marked on english.alarabiya.net

President Donald Trump has told senior advisers in recent days that he may hold off on attacking Iran if the US faces no new provocations from Tehran or the Iran-backed Houthis in Yemen, according to three people familiar with the matter. Trump has alternated between threats of escalating the war with new strikes and winding down hostilities, and current and former officials say he does not appear to have made up his mind about how to resolve the unpopular conflict, which he launched in February with Israel.

For all the latest headlines, follow our Google News channel online or via the app. But in meetings with his national security advisers and after a series of intelligence briefings, Trump said he was considering holding off on strikes, said the people, who, like others interviewed for this story, spoke on condition of anonymity. The war has hiked global fuel prices and proven unpopular with US voters, who handed control of Congress to the Democrats in last week’s midterm elections.

In a Reuters/Ipsos poll taken shortly before the November 3 elections, 55 percent of Americans said the war was not worth the cost, and Vice President JD Vance cited it as the reason Trump’s Republicans lost Congress. Trump’s private comments build on public remarks playing down the likelihood of major warfare resuming. “As Commander-in-Chief, President Trump is the architect and sole decision-maker who holds all the cards and will always ensure that America’s interests are protected,” a White House official said in a statement.

“The United States is in a very strong position with control of the Strait of Hormuz and the Iranian economy collapsing. Only President Trump knows what he will do, and when.” The CIA and Office of the Director of National Intelligence did not respond to requests for comment. US intelligence agencies have assessed that the US naval blockade and economic sanctions are hurting the Iranian economy and would continue to put pressure on Tehran, two US officials briefed on the intelligence said.

Building on its months-long blockade of Iranian sea traffic, the US military is also seeking to prevent weapons and other sanctioned material from entering the country by land or through the Caspian Sea, Reuters first reported last week. Military options At the same time, the US military is ready to escalate if needed, three more people familiar with US planning said. A third aircraft carrier is moving into the Middle East in the coming days to replace one of the two currently operating in the region, but all three carriers could stay if needed, the people said.

Trump could opt to bomb Iran’s underground nuclear facilities, a source said. But the US has already struck those facilities, and it is unclear whether further strikes would be successful. US intelligence agencies have assessed that renewed strikes would not significantly shift Iran’s demands in negotiations, two US officials said. Trump was also briefed on US weapon stockpiles, some of which have drawn down to worrying levels, the two people familiar with the intelligence briefings said.

Reuters reported in August that the US had used “virtually all” of its long-range precision munitions, and another person briefed on the matter said they have not been replenished. “The United States Military has enough munitions and ammo to serve all of the Commander-in-Chief’s strategic goals and beyond,” the White House official said. Israeli pressure Israeli officials have continued to lobby the administration to engage in another military campaign, according to a US official.

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

The article drops the Reuters section on the calls with Saudi Arabia and Turkey. In it, Mohammed bin Salman and Tayyip Erdogan both urged Trump not to resume attacks on Iran, and Trump told bin Salman on 31 October that he was planning to attack after the elections. The article keeps a section headed Israeli pressure on lobbying for another campaign. Without the cut section, a reader believes that the only outside pressure on Trump pushes towards war. The reader also does not learn that only two weeks earlier Trump had told an ally he intended to attack once the vote was over.

How we know

Trump signaled this week that the US has already achieved what it could from negotiations but did not say whether he would resume strikes. “We don’t need a deal with Iran,” Trump said in a social media post on Thursday. “We’ve got their money, Hundreds of Billions of Dollars, and ” With Reuters Read more: Iran’s navy says oil tanker on fire after hitting mine in Hormuz US Air Force conducts weapons test on B-21 Raider Advertisement Advertisement

Read the original article on english.alarabiya.net (opens in a new tab)
What we found (2)

Al Arabiya English runs a trimmed Reuters report on Trump telling advisers he may hold off on new attacks on Iran. It says plainly that Trump launched the war with Israel, and it attributes the officials' claims to them. It cuts the Reuters section showing that the Saudi and Turkish leaders urged Trump not to resume attacks and that he had told the Saudi crown prince he planned to attack after the elections, while keeping a section on Israeli lobbying for more strikes. No Iranian voice appears at all.

  1. One side gets the space

    Minor

    “we’ve got their Strait!”

    Why this matters
    Al Arabiya ends the article on Trump's boast "we’ve got their Strait!" after giving the White House, US officials and US intelligence every voice in the piece.
    The impression it gives
    A reader hears only Washington's account of Iran's position, that its economy is collapsing and its strait is under US control, and nothing from Iran itself.
    The context
    Iran appears only as a target and a set of demands. The outlet's own earlier report on the same diplomacy carried Iranian officials' response to US pressure, but this article gives Iran no space to answer.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

  2. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    The article drops the Reuters section on the calls with Saudi Arabia and Turkey. In it, Mohammed bin Salman and Tayyip Erdogan both urged Trump not to resume attacks on Iran, and Trump told bin Salman on 31 October that he was planning to attack after the elections. The article keeps a section headed Israeli pressure on lobbying for another campaign. Without the cut section, a reader believes that the only outside pressure on Trump pushes towards war. The reader also does not learn that only two weeks earlier Trump had told an ally he intended to attack once the vote was over.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

What it gets right

  • “the unpopular conflict, which he launched in February with Israel”

    Al Arabiya names who started the war, Trump with Israel, rather than writing the war as something that simply broke out.

  • “said the people, who, like others interviewed for this story, spoke on condition of anonymity”

    The article keeps clear that its central claim rests on anonymous sources and attributes it to them throughout.

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Al Arabiya English

  1. 13 NovIAEA increasingly concerned about Iranian enrichment plant, its report says3.0
  2. 11 NovIran security chief threatens to strike US bases in Europe if used for attacks3.0
  3. 10 NovIran producing 50 missiles per month despite crippled industry: Western intelligence0.0
  4. 10 NovIran’s top security official claims no talks underway with US3.0
  5. 10 NovRubio says no need for major combat operations on Iran given US economic campaign3.0

Everything we scored from Al Arabiya English