The National, on Iran, 28 October 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

UAE's Gargash says 'wars only lead to further crises' amid concerns of Iran escalation

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.2 findings

<a href="https://www.thenationalnews.com/news/gulf/2026/10/12/gargash-calls-for-stronger-gulf-security-and-collective-defence/" target="_blank" rel="" title="https://www.thenationalnews.com/news/gulf/2026/10/12/gargash-calls-for-stronger-gulf-security-and-collective-defence/">Dr Anwar Gargash</a>, diplomatic adviser to the UAE President, has warned that "wars lead only to further crises" amid mounting concerns over the growing possibility of a renewed US offensive on <a href="https://www.thenationalnews.com/news/mena/2026/10/28/live-iran-war-qatar/" target="_blank" rel="" title="https://www.thenationalnews.com/news/mena/2026/10/28/live-iran-war-qatar/">Iran</a>.

He emphasised that diplomacy remained the "most effective path" to achieving peace and security in the region, in a message on social media on Wednesday. Dr Gargash set out the UAE's stance in response to "growing speculation over possible escalation and confrontation". “The UAE’s approach remains firm and clear, based on wisdom, balance and prioritising dialogue and political solutions,” Dr Gargash wrote on X. “Regional experience has shown that wars lead only to further crises, and that diplomacy is the most effective path to safeguarding security and achieving peace and stability." <i>The Wall Street Journal</i> reported that the Trump administration warned several Gulf states to prepare for a possible renewed US military campaign against Iran after the November 3 midterm elections.

Mr Trump is leaning towards a short but intense wave of strikes, possibly aimed at Iranian nuclear sites, missile and drone arsenals and critical infrastructure, although he has not made a final decision and diplomatic efforts continue, the<i> Journal </i>said, quoting sources. Meanwhile, Qatari ​mediators ​presented ​Iran ⁠with a new ⁠draft deal ​on Sunday, aimed at reaching a permanent settlement to the war, a source told Reuters on Wednesday.

Tehran was ⁠considering ‌the proposal and expected to send a response by the end of the week, Reuters said. At the peak of , Iran struck the UAE and other Gulf states with ballistic missiles and drones, attempting to strike civilian infrastructure, including energy sites and airports. <a href="https://www.thenationalnews.com/lifestyle/2026/08/13/how-25000-bars-of-soap-rallied-uae-community-to-save-home-grown-business/" target="_blank" rel="">The UAE was the most heavily attacked</a> country, facing more than 550 ballistic missiles and 2,265 drones, most of which were intercepted or destroyed before reaching their targets.

A ceasefire began in June when the US and Iran signed a memorandum of understanding intended to pave the way for a final peace settlement. Mr Trump declared the truce and MoU “over” in early July after renewed Iranian attacks on ships in the Strait of Hormuz and retaliatory American strikes. Both sides have indicated in recent weeks that they are preparing for a resumption of hostilities.

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

The article says the June memorandum collapsed after Iranian attacks on ships. It does not say that the memorandum was also meant to end the US blockade of Iranian ports. Without this, a reader sees only Iran's conduct at sea as the cause of the breakdown.

How we know

Read the original article on thenationalnews.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (2)

The National reports Anwar Gargash's call for diplomacy as a renewed US offensive on Iran is feared. In its background the outlet gives the war a start date with no actor, never names Israel, and describes only Iran's strikes on the Gulf. It also leaves out that the June memorandum was meant to end the US blockade of Iranian ports.

  1. Hides who did it

    Minor

    “the war, which started on February 28”

    Why this matters
    The words 'the war, which started on February 28' give a start date with no actor. The same sentence then names Iran as the only side that struck anyone.
    The impression it gives
    A reader comes away believing the war is Iran attacking the UAE and other Gulf states, and may assume Iran began it.
    The context
    Other coverage of the same events calls it the United States-Israel war on Iran. Israel is never named anywhere in the article, and no US or Israeli strike on Iran during the war is described.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

  2. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    The article says the June memorandum collapsed after Iranian attacks on ships. It does not say that the memorandum was also meant to end the US blockade of Iranian ports. Without this, a reader sees only Iran's conduct at sea as the cause of the breakdown.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The National

  1. 28 OctIran war puts Republican foreign policy hawks under pressure before midterms0.0
  2. 27 OctIran-linked Handala hacking group sends bouquets and letters to Israel polling sites3.0
  3. 27 OctInside Tehran talks: Iranians link Houthi de-escalation to US approval of regional truce6.0
  4. 26 OctIraqi court seeks arrest of Maysan provincial leader for defying Iran border closure6.0
  5. 26 OctSaudi Defence Minister leads Makkah pact delegation to Tehran3.0

Everything we scored from The National