Daily Express, on UK Politics, 31 October 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

Widow of driver killed on smart motorway lets rip at Labour over speed camera failures

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.2 findings

Widow of driver killed on smart motorway lets rip at Labour over speed camera failures Claire Mercer, whose husband Jason died on the M1 in 2019, vents fury as 154 speed cameras go more than a year without enforcing limits Share Article Share Article Facebook X LinkedIn Reddit Bluesky Email Copy Link Link copied Add us as preferred source Comments By Aaron Newbury , Political Correspondent 07:00, Sat, Oct 31, 2026 Claire Mercer's husband Jason died on the M1 near Sheffield (Image: Claire Mercer) The widow of a man killed on a smart motorway has accused Labour of ditching a pledge to upgrade life-saving cameras meant to protect drivers.

Claire Mercer, whose husband Jason died on the M1 near Sheffield in 2019, said ministers had broken their word on the controversial roads. Her fury comes as it emerged that 154 speed cameras on smart motorways and A-roads have gone more than a year without enforcing variable speed limits. Now National Highways has admitted it . Mrs Mercer told the Sunday Express: “The Government said they would spend millions on fixing the cameras.

Article continues below ADVERTISEMENT “They have not done it, and they will not do it. We talk about having driverless cars. But we cannot even have technologically advanced roads – it’s all smoke and mirrors.” The Government’s five-year roads plan, known as RIS3, told National Highways to “continue to invest in the technology needed to help increase public confidence”. It singled out “upgrading CCTV cameras to detect incidents” as a key way to do it.

Get the day's biggest headlines in UK and World news and more I would like to receive emails from the Daily Express featuring our latest products, services, offers, and promotions from across the Reach Plc family . Subscribe Invalid email You agree you are 18 or over. We use your sign-up to provide content in ways you've consented to and to improve our understanding of you. This may include adverts from us and third parties based on our knowledge of you.

You can unsubscribe at any time. More Info . BBC Question Time erupts into chaos after Zia Yusuf calls Alastair Campbell 'war criminal' 'Vote Restore get Labour!' Reform despair as they lose election by just two votes Yet less than six months in, . The admission was dragged out of National Highways only after Mrs Mercer challenged its refusal to answer her Freedom of Information request.

Article continues below ADVERTISEMENT Under the law, people have the right to demand information from public bodies, which must normally respond within 20 working days. The company first claimed it did not hold the figures, because the Government was consulting on plans to slash its capital funding by £428million over four years. Article continues below ADVERTISEMENT But an internal review forced a , conceding its original response “was not compliant with the Freedom of Information Act”.

It then revealed it would spend an estimated £309million replacing ageing roadside kit on smart motorways, including £46million on CCTV. But the cash will only replace old equipment “where needed due to their age or obsolescence”, without a single penny going on new cameras. An independent review into the was ordered in January and was expected to take at least 18 weeks. It still has not been published. Transport sources say they are working round the clock clearing up the mess.

Mrs Mercer, who has campaigned tirelessly since her husband’s death, said successive governments had repeatedly failed drivers. She said: “We’ve had six prime ministers and seven secretaries of state in the last seven years alone and even more promises, but very little action. What is it going to take for them to realise the tangible, always present, already there and much cheaper hard shoulder is the best option?” MPs took aim at the Government, with Tory shadow minister Greg Smith saying: “Labour’s smart motorways aren’t looking very smart when 440 miles are reportedly without functioning cameras.

Ministers need to take responsibility, come clean about this failure and get the system working properly.” A National Highways spokesperson said: “We take the safety of our roads extremely seriously and our thoughts are with Ms Mercer. Speeding offences continue to be detected and prosecuted, and a range of enforcement measures are in place to help keep road users safe.” The system is believed to be going through extensive testing to ensure the problem is properly fixed.

Drivers are urged to continue to stick to life-saving speed limits across the country. National Highways Motorway Labour Party Share Article Share Article Facebook X LinkedIn Reddit Bluesky Email Copy Link Link copied Add us as preferred source Comments

Read the original article on express.co.uk (opens in a new tab)
What we found (2)

The Daily Express says in its own voice that National Highways has no plans for new technology despite a government pledge. Yet its own later sentences report £46million on CCTV, the area the pledge named. It also uses loaded words such as "humiliating climbdown" and "camera fiasco" that pass verdicts the reported facts do not fully carry.

  1. States one side's claim as fact

    Minor

    “has no plans to add any new safety technology to smart motorways, despite a government pledge just months ago”

    Why this matters
    The words "despite a government pledge just months ago" state in the outlet's own voice that a pledge has been broken.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes the Government promised new safety technology and that National Highways is now spending nothing on it.
    The context
    The pledge the article quotes told National Highways to "continue to invest" in technology and named upgrading CCTV. The article later reports £309million on replacing roadside kit, including £46million on CCTV. Whether replacing ageing cameras breaks the pledge is Mrs Mercer's charge, and the outlet adopts it as fact.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“continue to invest in the technology needed to help increase public confidence”
    • Elsewhere in the article“including £46million on CCTV”

    Show it in the article

    “the government-owned company has confessed it has no plans to add any new technology at all”

    Why this matters
    The word "confessed" and the phrase "no new technology at all" present the spending plan as an admission of doing nothing.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes no money is going on smart motorway technology.
    The context
    The outlet's own S22 reports an estimated £309million on replacing ageing roadside kit. The pledge it quotes concerned CCTV for detecting incidents, a different matter from the 154 speed cameras not enforcing limits that the headline is about.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“spend an estimated £309million replacing ageing roadside kit on smart motorways”
    • Elsewhere in the article“upgrading CCTV cameras to detect incidents”

    Show it in the article

  2. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “humiliating climbdown”

    Why this matters
    The words "humiliating climbdown" pass a verdict on a routine internal review of a Freedom of Information response.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes National Highways was publicly shamed.
    The context
    The article reports only that an internal review found the first response non-compliant and released the figures.

    Show it in the article

    “camera fiasco”

    Why this matters
    The word "fiasco" labels the matter in the outlet's own voice before the independent review it mentions has reported.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes the failure has been established as a farce.
    The context
    The article says the review into the cameras has not yet been published, so its findings are unknown.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“It still has not been published.”

    Show it in the article

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Daily Express

  1. 31 OctBritain is sleepwalking into danger — bring back National Service0.0
  2. 31 OctPolice settle debate on whether you can report door-knocking children this Halloween0.0
  3. 31 OctAndy Burnham issued £174.95 reality check as struggling UK families get rid of cars6.0
  4. 31 OctAndy Burnham ‘open’ to calls for Britain to formally apologise for slavery0.0
  5. 30 OctLabour’s new £5,950 VED car tax charge from April 20277.3

Everything we scored from Daily Express