Anadolu Agency (English) · Iran · 3 Aug 2026

Passive voice hides who attacked, the headline editorialises, and the legal stakes go unmentioned.

/ 10 · article score

scored on 5 of 11 measures · thin coverage

The double standard

The article attributes the origin of regional escalation to US and Israeli attacks on Iran as established fact, while describing the subsequent cycle of violence as a mutual, symmetric exchange, applying a stricter causal standard to one side than the other.

How it builds, in Escalation origin and ceasefire collapse paragraph

US/Israel named as initiating aggressors, Iran as reactor
Tensions have escalated across the Middle East since the US and Israel launched attacks on Iran in February, triggering retaliatory strikes by Tehran targeting several countries across the region.
Named actors, active voice, causal chain asserted as fact with no attribution
Both sides flattened into symmetric mutual exchange
the US and Iran exchanging attacks for nearly two weeks
Agentless, symmetric framing; no initiator named, no causal chain
Trump claim carried without qualification or counter-source
US President Donald Trump said that he canceled a planned military strike against Iran after Tehran and other Middle Eastern countries requested time to finalize the framework of a peace deal
Single-source, unattributed as opinion; presented as straightforward fact
Sinwar death framed as clash, not targeted killing
Yahya Sinwar, who was killed in a clash with Israeli forces in southern Gaza in October 2024
Neutral passive construction; no actor foregrounded, no legal or moral characterisation

The same decision, both sides

Attribution of responsibility for starting hostilities

The US and Israel are named as the initiating actors in an active-voice, unattributed causal claim.

the US and Israel launched attacks on Iran in February, triggering retaliatory strikes by Tehran

When the ceasefire collapses and fighting resumes, both sides are dissolved into a symmetric, agentless phrase with no initiator identified.

the US and Iran exchanging attacks for nearly two weeks

Whether a claim is sourced or presented as established fact

Iran's peaceful intent is explicitly attributed to a named speaker and a named outlet, flagging it as a claim.

Pezeshkian said in statements carried by Press TV

The assertion that the US and Israel started the conflict in February is presented as unattributed background fact, with no sourcing or qualification.

Tensions have escalated across the Middle East since the US and Israel launched attacks on Iran in February

What a reader is left with. A reader is left with the clear impression that the US and Israel bear responsibility for starting the regional conflict, while the later, more ambiguous phase of fighting is presented as a mutual standoff for which no side is more culpable than the other.

Every highlight is a quote the model flagged. Tap one — or a metric below — to see what it measures and why it scored the way it did.

Aggressor framingHeadline analysis

Tehran not seeking escalation in region, Iranian president says

Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian said Monday Tehran does not seek to fuel tensions in the region, vowing to use its full capabilities to defend the country’s security and interests. “The Islamic Republic of Iran does not seek to escalate tensions or instability in the region. However, it will act with its full capabilities to defend the country's security, national interests, and territorial integrity,” Pezeshkian said in statements carried by Press TV. Tensions have escalated across the Middle East since the US and Israel launched attacks on Iran in February, triggering retaliatory strikes by Tehran targeting several countries across the region. The US and Iran agreed to a ceasefire in April and subsequently signed a Pakistan-mediated memorandum of understanding in June aimed at ending their military conflict and reaching a lasting peace agreement. The deal, however, collapsed last month with the US and Iran exchanging attacks for nearly two weeks. On Saturday, US President Donald Trump said that he canceled a planned military strike against Iran after Tehran and other Middle Eastern countries requested time to finalize the framework of a peace deal, saying Israel has joined the commitment. Meanwhile, Pezeshkian spoke over the phone with new Hamas chief Khalil al-Hayya during which they discussed Palestinian developments and the situation in the Gaza Strip and West Bank. A Hamas statement said Pezeshkian affirmed Iran's support for the Palestinian people and their rights. The Iranian president also congratulated Hayya on his election as the new Hamas chief, and expressed his appreciation for the continued direct communication between the two sides, according to the statement. On July 20, Hamas said Hayya was elected as the group leader, succeeding Yahya Sinwar, who was killed in a clash with Israeli forces in southern Gaza in October 2024. Hayya, for his part, emphasized “the Palestinian people's commitment to their full rights and their use of legitimate means to achieve them,” the statement said. He expressed his hope for halting attacks on Iran and the return of security and stability to the region. The call came after the Board of Peace released a draft agreement on Friday outlining the principles and implementation mechanisms for the next phase of US President Donald Trump’s Gaza plan, including security, administrative and transitional arrangements in the enclave, as well as a proposed political track.

Read the original article ↗