The Jerusalem Post, on UK Politics, 19 October 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

British woman referred to counter-terror org, questioned by police over support for Israel - report

Findings are available in the analysis below.1 finding

A 44-year old British mother of two was questioned by two police officers after being referred to Prevent, the United Kingdom's counter-extremism program, due to her advocacy for Israel, the Telegraph reported on Sunday. Holly Passmore told the Telegraph that the officers asked her about her recent trip to Israel, telling her that she may be "at risk of manipulation." Passmore later obtained police records through a subject access request and found that she'd been labeled as having mental health issues and being "vulnerable to negative influence."

The reports revealed that the referral said Passmore "over-identified with the conflict between Israel and Palestine” and was “supportive of Israel to the point that she has traveled to Israel.”Passmore has had health concerns she was open about, including severe endometriosis and adenomyosis, as well as ADHD and autism, but told the Telegraph that nobody would describe her as vulnerable. Visit came despite lack of counter-terror concern“They knew I'm not vulnerable, but they wanted to monitor me because I was advocating for Israel,” she said.

“When they came to the door, they didn't discuss my health. They only asked about Israel.”The police intelligence report acknowledged that "there is no CT [counter-terror] concern with an individual being supportive of Israel as it's a democracy and it would not be a CT concern for a person to travel there."

The report concluded that "no further inquiries are currently necessary to be completed by any other department in respect of this report."But Passmore, who is currently pursuing a Master's degree in Holocaust studies at the University of Haifa, was visited by police officers weeks after a trip to Israel in June of last year. “They asked me why I was interested in 'Jewish issues', because County Durham is not a Jewish area,” she added.

“They even asked me if I'd ever been to Auschwitz, and I said, 'Yes'.“I said to them: 'Look, I get that this is not something that people around here necessarily are interested in, but you know this is something that's important to me, and it is not illegal'.Passmore urged not to discuss case onlinePassmore had been to Israel on a press trip alongside British journalists and social media influencers after building an online following on X/Twitter.

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

The article calls Passmore's trip a press trip alongside journalists and influencers. It never says the trip was organised by Israel's embassy in London, which Arutz Sheva reported from the same Telegraph story. Without that, a reader takes the visit the referral cited to be an independent press trip, not one arranged by a foreign state's embassy.

How we know

Originally created to follow gossip about the Duchess of Sussex, the account, which now has over 28,000 followers, turned to campaigning for humanitarian rights, particularly the plight of women in Afghanistan. After the October 7 massacre, she used her platform to speak out against antisemitism and express solidarity with Jewish people. Passmore said that she was urged by the police to stop discussing the case online after she complained about the visit.

A Counter Terrorism Policing North East spokesman said they could not comment on an individual case. “All referrals are treated in the strictest confidence and will always prioritize the safety and welfare of those concerned. Where we are notified of concerns for a particular individual, specially trained officers will listen carefully to the concerns and offer any additional support that may be necessary,” they told the Telegram.

Read the original article on jpost.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (1)

The Jerusalem Post rewrites a Telegraph report that a County Durham woman was referred to Prevent and visited by police over her support for Israel. It attributes the account to the Telegraph and to Passmore, quotes the police record that found no counter-terror concern, and gives the police response. It calls her trip to Israel a press trip and never says, as other coverage did, that Israel's embassy in London organised it.

  1. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    The article calls Passmore's trip a press trip alongside journalists and influencers. It never says the trip was organised by Israel's embassy in London, which Arutz Sheva reported from the same Telegraph story. Without that, a reader takes the visit the referral cited to be an independent press trip, not one arranged by a foreign state's embassy.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

What it gets right

  • “The police intelligence report acknowledged that”

    It quotes the police record itself, which states there was no counter-terror concern, so the reader has the document and not only Passmore's account.

  • “Passmore later obtained police records through a subject access request”

    It tells the reader where the quoted wording of the referral comes from.

  • “A Counter Terrorism Policing North East spokesman said they could not comment on an individual case.”

    It gives the police force a reply and reports its statement in full.

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The Jerusalem Post

  1. 21 OctIndependent review finds extensive antisemitism in English schools6.0
  2. 20 OctMan arrested after alleged antisemitic attacks on three Jewish women in London0.0
  3. 18 OctIn a London synagogue, a Jewish David stands up to the Green Party’s Goliath - opinion8.7
  4. 14 OctGreen Party coalition ruled out by UK PM Burnham following antisemitic 'Zionism is racism' motion6.0
  5. 14 OctUK Green Party gambling on anti-Israel politics, former deputy leader warns 'Post' - exclusive 8.2

Everything we scored from The Jerusalem Post