Daily Mail, on Climate, 1 November 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

John Swinney's former depute Kate Forbes piles pressure on him to back more North Sea drilling

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.2 findings

John Swinney ’s former deputy has piled pressure on him to back the Rosebank oil development. Kate Forbes , the former Deputy First Minister, said backing the project, off the Shetland Islands, would be ‘entirely consistent’ with a motion passed last month at SNP conference. Her comments, in a newspaper article supporting the case for Rosebank, come after the First Minister last week for refusing to say seven times if he supported the project or not.

Writing in a column for the Sunday Times, Ms Forbes, who is also a former Finance Secretary and Economy Secretary, highlighted concerns that 18,000 offshore energy jobs could be lost by 2035 if new opportunities fail to keep pace with diminishing oil and gas activity. She said: ‘It is the right decision to approve Rosebank. And doing so is entirely consistent with the motion recently passed at SNP conference, allowing the Scottish government to back Rosebank, for the benefit of Scotland.’

SNP delegates at the party’s conference in Aberdeen last month backed a motion which formally scrapped the ‘presumption against’ new drilling introduced by Nicola Sturgeon and backed domestic production over foreign imports. But the Scottish Government is expected to delay publishing its final energy strategy, which will confirm its approach to new drilling, until later next year. At First Minister’s Questions last week, Mr Swinney was accused of showing a ‘lack of backbone’ on the issue of North Sea drilling by repeatedly refusing to give a straight answer on whether he supports or opposes the Rosebank development.

Kate Forbes has urged First Minister John Swinney to back more North Sea oil drilling Scottish Conservative energy spokesman Liam Kerr said: ‘John Swinney’s former deputy Kate Forbes has joined the growing chorus urging him to get off the fence and back Rosebank. ‘He’s not listening to communities in the North East whose livelihoods depend on the North Sea, but perhaps he’ll listen to her. ‘’

The Scottish Government its position on Rosebank was discussed at First Minister’s Questions last week. In her newspaper article, Ms Forbes also criticised the UK Government for proposing loans or equity investment for the Acorn carbon capture development rather than further capital grants, saying the decision was ‘bewildering’. She said: ‘It’s an unedifying mess, reminiscent of the storm debris littering the garden.’ In further criticism of the Budget unveiled by Chancellor John Healey last week, Ms Forbes said: ‘The northeast is littered with storm damage literally and metaphorically.

Communities don’t have the luxury of hunkering down and waiting it out. We’ve learnt to prepare well pile up the firewood, stock up on nonperishable food and fully charge phones. ‘We’ve whittled it down to the core essentials. To throw the analogy back at the chancellor, if households know how to prioritise in the eye of the storm, so can the Treasury. A strong, growing economy, reliable sources of energy and a balanced budget. ‘Households in the northeast do not have the luxury of hunkering down and waiting it out.’

On the BBC’s The Sunday Show yesterday, UK Energy Minister Martin McCluskey said money already drawn down by the Acorn developer remains in place but future funding will be through loans and equities which ‘are better value for the taxpayer’. He said: ‘We are making sure there is support there for the Acorn project. We want that project to succeed and the developers, who I’m speaking to later this week, will come forward with proposals and that funding is on the table.’

Read the original article on dailymail.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (2)

The Daily Mail reports Kate Forbes's column urging John Swinney to back the Rosebank oil field, with her claims and a Tory critic's claims clearly attributed. Every voice on Rosebank in the piece argues for it, and the outlet never says why anyone opposes the field. In its own voice it also says Swinney faced "widespread ridicule", which it supports only with one opposition jibe.

  1. One side gets the space

    Minor

    “His refusal to give Rosebank his unequivocal backing is jeopardising thousands of jobs and is putting Britain’s energy security at risk.”

    Why this matters
    Liam Kerr's claim that not backing Rosebank is "jeopardising thousands of jobs" and "putting Britain’s energy security at risk" is one of two pro-Rosebank voices that fill the Rosebank part of the article. Nobody answers it.
    The impression it gives
    A reader comes away thinking the only argument about Rosebank is how fast Swinney should back it, and that no one has a case against the field.
    The context
    The outlet's own earlier report shows ten unions demanding that Rosebank be blocked, and a UK Government spokesman tying North Sea policy to tackling the climate crisis. This article never mentions the climate or emissions case against new drilling, and gives no opponent of Rosebank a line.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

  2. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “faced widespread ridicule”

    Why this matters
    The Daily Mail says in its own voice that Swinney "faced widespread ridicule" for declining to state his position on Rosebank.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes Swinney was mocked broadly across politics and the public.
    The context
    The only response the article reports is a single opposition accusation at First Minister's Questions. Nothing in the piece shows that the ridicule was widespread.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“Mr Swinney was accused of showing”

    Show it in the article

What it gets right

  • “highlighted concerns that 18,000 offshore energy jobs could be lost by 2035”

    The jobs figure is clearly presented as Forbes's concern from her column, not as the outlet's own fact.

  • “future funding will be through loans and equities which ‘are better value for the taxpayer’”

    The article gives the UK Government's answer to Forbes's criticism of the Acorn funding decision.

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Daily Mail

  1. 31 OctEnergy Secretary Miatta Fahnbulleh isolated as PM and Chancellor row back from Net Zero3.0
  2. 31 OctSo-called 'green' SNP Government buys diesel pickup trucks despite vowing to phase them out3.0
  3. 29 OctHurricane-fueled storms threaten parts of US as torrential downpours sweep in overnight6.0
  4. 29 OctEngland records its wettest week for two years after storms Austen and Boelo bring heavy rain - yet parts of south remain officially in drought6.0
  5. 29 OctArizona man was sucked into tornado Wizard of Oz style but ended up surviving3.0

Everything we scored from Daily Mail