Anadolu Agency (English), on Climate, 14 November 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

Greenpeace’s seabed protest puts boulders in path of major North Sea wind farm

Findings are available in the analysis below.1 finding

Boulders dumped by Greenpeace activists off England’s Norfolk coast to prevent destructive fishing practices could complicate preparations for a major offshore wind farm project, despite the environmental group saying they would not pose a significant obstacle. The activists placed around 15 metric tons of rocks on the seabed as part of a campaign against bottom trawling, a fishing method that involves dragging heavy nets along the ocean floor.

However, most of the boulders were deposited within the area designated for the Norfolk Vanguard East offshore wind farm, one of the UK’s largest planned renewable energy projects. The development is part of a £12 billion ($15.86 billion) investment agreement involving German energy company RWE and the UK government. Construction is expected to begin next year. Greenpeace began placing the rocks without permission from the marine authority, days before the UK government announced £1 billion ($1.32 billion) in public funding for the Vanguard East and Vanguard West projects at the COP31 climate summit.

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

The article never says that Greenpeace was not aware of the plans to build Vanguard East when it placed the boulders, though it did check the seabed for cables, pipelines and wrecks. S3's 'However' and S6's link between the dumping and the funding announcement days later leave room for a reader to think the group targeted the wind farm site on purpose. The article's own account of the anti-trawling aim and Greenpeace's support for offshore wind limits that reading.

How we know

RWE is now in discussions with Greenpeace to establish the precise locations of the boulders and assess their potential impact on construction and undersea cables. A company spokesperson described the communication with Greenpeace as “constructive” and said RWE would “continue to investigate the precise implications” for the project, according to daily The Guardian. Greenpeace UK co-executive director Will McCallum dismissed suggestions that the rocks would create a serious obstacle.

“Anyone familiar with offshore wind in the North Sea knows that energy companies routinely move naturally occurring boulders from the seabed before building windfarms,” he said. “Some of these boulders can be 10 times heavier than those we placed.” McCallum said the organization supported offshore wind development but wanted to protect marine ecosystems from destructive fishing activities. “While we wait for this windfarm to be built, our boulders will provide an essential barrier to destructive bottom trawlers that are decimating the seabed in this protected area,” he added.

The rocks, some bearing the signatures of actors Simon Pegg and Benedict Cumberbatch, are expected to be removed within months as preparations for the wind farm advance.

Read the original article on aa.com.tr (opens in a new tab)
What we found (1)

Anadolu Agency reports that boulders Greenpeace dropped off Norfolk to block bottom trawling landed mostly inside the planned Norfolk Vanguard East wind farm site, and that RWE is assessing the impact. It explains the protest's purpose and gives both RWE and Greenpeace their say. It leaves out that Greenpeace did not know about the wind farm plans, which the Guardian reported. That is a small gap and does not mislead much, given the article's own account of the anti-trawling aim.

  1. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    The article never says that Greenpeace was not aware of the plans to build Vanguard East when it placed the boulders, though it did check the seabed for cables, pipelines and wrecks. S3's 'However' and S6's link between the dumping and the funding announcement days later leave room for a reader to think the group targeted the wind farm site on purpose. The article's own account of the anti-trawling aim and Greenpeace's support for offshore wind limits that reading.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

What it gets right

  • “as part of a campaign against bottom trawling, a fishing method that involves dragging heavy nets along the ocean floor”

    The article says plainly what the protest was for and explains the fishing method it targets, so the reader is not left guessing why activists dropped rocks.

  • “McCallum said the organization supported offshore wind development but wanted to protect marine ecosystems from destructive fishing activities”

    The article gives Greenpeace's own position on the wind farm, so the reader does not mistake an anti-trawling protest for opposition to offshore wind.

  • “according to daily The Guardian”

    The article credits the source of RWE's comments rather than presenting them as its own reporting.

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Anadolu Agency (English)

  1. 14 NovOnly 30% of businesses surveyed in Türkiye have climate resilience plans: Marsh0.0
  2. 13 NovUN chief urges drastic emissions cuts at COP31 in Türkiye, warns of inevitable warming overshoot0.0
  3. 13 NovNorway's Supreme Court invalidates approvals for 3 North Sea oil, gas fields0.0
  4. 13 NovINTERVIEW – Brazil focuses on Amazon reforestation, not revenge against Bolsonaro, environment minister says0.0
  5. 13 NovINTERVIEW - ‘Pro-climate’ agenda an election-winner, says London mayor0.0

Everything we scored from Anadolu Agency (English)