The New York Times, on Climate, 10 November 2026

6.0out of 10Serious

Iran War Unexpectedly This Year

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.1 finding

Global fossil fuel emissions are on track to fall slightly in 2026, as disruptions caused by the U.S. war with Iran forced many countries to cut back on their use of oil and gas, researchers said on Monday. Nations are projected to emit roughly 38.2 billion tons of planet-warming carbon dioxide by burning oil, gas and coal for energy this year, according to data from the Global Carbon Project . Those sources are the largest contributors to global warming.

That’s roughly 0.4 percent less than in 2025. The dip was driven partly by fighting in the Middle East and the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, as well as by the war between Russia and Ukraine. Both conflicts have caused global prices for crude oil, natural gas, gasoline and diesel to soar, and many nations have responded by using less oil and gas and shifting to domestic alternatives, including coal or renewable energy. Globally, emissions from oil consumption are expected to drop nearly 2 percent this year, while emissions from natural gas will decline roughly 0.3 percent.

By contrast, carbon dioxide emissions from burning of coal are expected to rise roughly 0.6 percent, thanks to increased consumption in places like China and India. (Even though coal pollutes more than oil or gas, the uptick in coal consumption was smaller in comparison.) The drop surprised analysts, who had been anticipating before the war that emissions would rise slightly this year. “I would call it unexpected,” said Glen Peters, a senior researcher at the CICERO Center for International Climate Research in Oslo and one of the authors of the report.

“It’s pretty rare to see a drop in oil demand this big.” Carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuels Source: Global Carbon Project Brad Plumer/The New York Times We are having trouble retrieving the article content. Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings. Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times. Thank you for your patience while we verify access.

Already a subscriber? Log in . Want all of The Times? Subscribe .

Read the original article on nytimes.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (1)

The New York Times reports the Global Carbon Project's projection that fossil fuel emissions will dip about 0.4 percent in 2026, partly because of the US war with Iran. The body attributes and qualifies the figures carefully. The headline drops those qualifications and tells the reader that carbon emissions as a whole fell, which the same study contradicts.

  1. Headline goes beyond the article

    Serious

    “Drove Down Carbon Emissions”

    Why this matters
    The words "Drove Down Carbon Emissions" state, without qualification, that carbon emissions fell this year and that the Iran war was the cause.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes total global carbon emissions fell in 2026 and that the Iran war alone brought this about.
    The context
    The body limits the fall to fossil fuel emissions and says the war was only part of the cause, alongside the Russia and Ukraine war. Coverage of the same study reports that overall global carbon dioxide emissions still rose by about 1 percent.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Iran war helped push fossil fuel emissions slightly lower this year, researchers project, though total carbon dioxide emissions are still expected to rise.

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The New York Times

  1. 9 NovWhat Is Congress’s Plan to Speed Up Energy Permits?0.0
  2. 9 NovHow to Rent an Electric Vehicle: A Guide for Newbies0.0
  3. 8 NovWhy the Iran War Has Spurred Both Clean Energy and Fossil Fuels0.0
  4. 8 NovA Guide to COP31 Climate Talks in Antalya, Turkey0.0
  5. 8 NovWith Hopes Low and Temperatures High, Climate Summit Opens in Turkey0.0

Everything we scored from The New York Times