Al Jazeera English, on UK Politics, 21 October 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

Actors, writers condemn

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.1 finding

Dozens of leading writers, actors and activists have condemned the UK law used to proscribe Palestine Action as a “repressive absurdity” in an open letter backing Irish novelist Sally Rooney, whose books have been withdrawn from sale in the United Kingdom. The letter comes after Rooney said her books had been pulled from sale in the UK due to her public support for Palestine Action, a group the British government designated as a “terrorist organisation”.

Recommended Stories list of 3 items list 1 of 3 UK PM adviser’s wife expresses ‘support’ for Palestine Action list 2 of 3 Sally Rooney’s books pulled from UK over Palestine Action support list 3 of 3 UK police rule out probe into Palestine Action post by PM adviser’s wife end of list Signatories include actors Paul Mescal – who played in an adaptation of her book Normal People, Susan Sarandon and Tilda Swinton; broadcaster Gary Lineker; and writers Arundhati Roy, Naomi Klein, JM Coetzee, Zadie Smith and William Dalrymple.

Filmmaker Jonathan Glazer, philosopher Slavoj Zizek, musician Kate Nash and the Irish hip-hop group Kneecap have also signed the letter. “Sally Rooney is a writer, not a terrorist. Her books must be available to the public,” the letter reads. “Their withdrawal from sale, on the basis of ill-conceived and draconian anti-terror legislation, is an affront to basic principles of free speech and expression so long taken for granted in this country.”

The letter appears on the cover of this week’s New Statesman magazine, two weeks before the Supreme Court is set to hear a case on the ban. “We categorically reject censorship – whether direct or indirect – and urge the government to change course, amending the legislation which has led us to this point of repressive absurdity,” the letter concludes. Rooney’s publisher, Faber & Faber, said on Wednesday that the withdrawal stemmed from “circumstances where Faber cannot pass on UK earnings to Sally Rooney for her work” and to continue sales would be an “unconscionable situation for a publisher”.

Advertisement Rooney has said that further publication of her work could constitute a “serious criminal offence”. She said she had made “every effort to be honest” with the public about her beliefs and intentions, adding that she was “wholly prepared to accept the consequences”. E-books of Rooney’s work have also been removed from sale in the UK, although some physical copies remain available in bookshops. She has authored four best-selling novels, selling more than six million books globally.

Read the original article on aljazeera.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (1)

Al Jazeera reports an open letter from writers and actors backing Sally Rooney after her books were withdrawn from UK sale over her support for Palestine Action. It attributes the terrorist designation to the government and gives the publisher's own explanation. Its one problem is a headline that says the anti-terror law is "targeting" Rooney, when the body shows a general proscription law whose effect on her came through her publisher's legal position.

  1. Headline goes beyond the article

    Minor

    “UK anti-terror law targeting Sally Rooney”

    Why this matters
    The headline says, in Al Jazeera's own voice, that the anti-terror law is "targeting" Rooney.
    The impression it gives
    A reader comes away believing the law, or the government, singled out Rooney personally.
    The context
    The body describes a law used to proscribe Palestine Action. It says the withdrawal came from her publisher, which said it could not pass on her UK earnings. That is a consequence for her, not a law aimed at her, and nobody in the article says it targets her.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“the UK law used to proscribe Palestine Action”
    • Elsewhere in the article“the withdrawal stemmed from “circumstances where Faber cannot pass on UK earnings to Sally Rooney for her work””

    Show it in the article

What it gets right

  • “a group the British government designated as a “terrorist organisation””

    It attributes the terrorist label to the government that applied it rather than adopting it in the outlet's own voice.

  • “Rooney’s publisher, Faber & Faber, said on Wednesday that the withdrawal stemmed from “circumstances where Faber cannot pass on UK earnings to Sally Rooney for her work””

    It gives the publisher's own stated reason for the withdrawal, so the reader knows how the ban led to the books coming off sale.

  • “she was “wholly prepared to accept the consequences””

    It reports Rooney's own words on her position rather than assigning her a motive.

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Al Jazeera English

Everything we scored from Al Jazeera English