Arab News, on Lebanon, 29 July 2026

The headline editorialises, the dead are labelled, the other side is not, and Hezbollah is reduced to an Iranian proxy.

3.9

out of 10, scored on 9 of 12 checks.

The double standard

The article names and labels Hezbollah's dead as combatants with a factional affiliation, while Israeli military actions that destroyed the village are rendered without an actor, creating an asymmetry in how each side's conduct is presented to the reader.

How it builds, in Bodies recovery and village destruction passage

  1. No actor named: who did the bombing?

    Most homes were too badly damaged from bombing for anyone to stay.

    Agentless passive: destruction attributed to no one

  2. Dead named and labelled by faction

    the bodies of Hezbollah fighters

    Full factional identification applied to the dead

  3. Hezbollah given two hostile qualifiers at first mention

    the Iranian-backed Hezbollah militia

    Dual pejorative labelling: foreign sponsor and militia status

  4. Hezbollah refusal stated as plain fact

    But Hezbollah itself still refuses to give up its weapons.

    Unattributed declarative assertion of bad faith

The same decision, both sides

Attribution of physical destruction

Israeli bombing that destroyed the village is rendered without an actor, leaving the damage as an unexplained condition.

Most homes were too badly damaged from bombing for anyone to stay.

Hezbollah's dead are recovered with full factional identification, making their presence and role explicit.

the bodies of Hezbollah fighters

Labelling at first mention

Hezbollah is introduced with two hostile qualifiers simultaneously, framing it as a foreign proxy and a paramilitary force.

the Iranian-backed Hezbollah militia

Israel is introduced without any qualifying label, appearing as a neutral state actor.

A US-brokered plan for Israel to withdraw gradually from occupied areas of southern Lebanon

What a reader is left with. A reader is left with the impression that Hezbollah is the named, labelled, and obstructive party, while Israeli military destruction of the village is a natural condition with no attributed agent.

First test of US-backed ‘pilot zones’ in south Lebanon lays bare difficulties

<p> ZAWTAR AL-GHARBIYEH, Lebanon: A US-brokered plan for Israel to withdraw gradually from occupied areas of southern Lebanon in exchange for the disarmament of the Iranian-backed Hezbollah militia is off to a painfully slow start.</p> <p> To the US, the “pilot zone program” ​is the centerpiece of a June 26 framework deal intended to end the war between Israel and Hezbollah, and establish peaceful ties between Israel and Lebanon.<br /> But Hezbollah itself still refuses to give up its weapons. And on the ground, the rollout of the first zone in the south Lebanese village of Zawtar Al-Gharbiyeh last week offered a glimpse of a strained and complex process that will be no easier to repeat elsewhere.<br /> A senior Lebanese military official, who requested anonymity in order to speak freely, said it had taken weeks of US-brokered negotiations with Israel and days of military operations to establish the first zone in a single village.</p> <p> The agreement links Israel’s progressive withdrawal to the “verified disarmament” of Hezbollah — which is not a party to the deal, has refused to give up its arsenal, and has raised the prospect of internal strife if the state tries to disarm it by force.<br /> With such operational and political challenges ahead, the Lebanese military official and two ‌foreign security officials said ‌they expected it to take more than a year to secure Israel’s full withdrawal from Lebanon.</p> <p> <em><strong>Hezbollah drew Lebanon into Middle East war</strong></em></p> <p> Two ⁠days after the US and Israel attacked Iran on February 28, Hezbollah pulled Lebanon into the war by firing at Israel. Israeli forces responded with aerial bombardments reaching as far as Beirut, and by seizing a strip of land extending about 10 km (6 miles) deep into southern Lebanon.</p> <p> Even after a ceasefire last month, Israeli troops remained in the zone, razing villages and ordering residents who had fled not to return.<br /> The US began mediating talks between Lebanon and Israel in mid-April, and setting out the pilot zone program in early June.<br /> More than six weeks later, Lebanese soldiers deployed to Zawtar Al-Gharbiyeh to implement the first zone after Israeli forces pulled back.<br /> Within hours, Israeli units still stationed hundreds of meters away in an adjacent village accused Lebanese troops of deploying too close, and fired warning shots to keep them back.</p> <p> An Israeli military official said ⁠troops were adjusting their “force posture” in the first pilot zone, without saying whether those who had withdrawn from ‌Zawtar Al-Gharbiyeh had left Lebanon altogether or redeployed to other parts of the south.<br /> The Lebanese troops spent ‌two days clearing rubble and accompanying paramedics into the village to recover the bodies of Hezbollah fighters.</p> <p> On ​July 24, they finally allowed displaced residents to return, in carefully managed ‌convoys. Most homes were too badly damaged from bombing for anyone to stay.<br /> Mayor Abed Ezzedin told Reuters around half of Zawtar Al-Gharbiyeh was in ruins, ‌and reconstruction seemed far away.<br /> “What kind of pilot zone are we talking about? And what kind of security and safety? There are still 70 or 80 occupied villages,” he said.<br /> “If they (Israeli troops) are going to withdraw from one village while remaining on the edge of the next — we can’t do that. It won’t work. And what about the reconstruction we keep talking about? Without security and peace of mind, we can’t rebuild. We cannot lay a single stone on top of another in Zawtar.”</p> <p> <em><strong>Hezbollah disarmament remains key</strong></em></p> <p> Israeli troops remain ‌stationed in a semicircle of towns to the north and east of Zawtar Al-Gharbiyeh, the strategic Beaufort Castle on a commanding ridge just 6 km (4 miles) to the east, and dozens of villages further south.<br /> A key test ⁠of Lebanon’s willingness to disarm Hezbollah ⁠in exchange for more Israeli withdrawals could lie a few kilometers away, along a mountain ridge known as Ali Taher.<br /> Hezbollah is suspected of operating a command center and weapons stores there, Lebanese security sources told Reuters.<br /> Hassan Jouni, a Lebanese analyst and retired general, said it was unlikely Israeli troops would withdraw from any more nearby positions “until the problem of Ali Taher is resolved” — either with Israel capturing the ridge or Lebanese troops clearing out Hezbollah weapons stores. Jouni noted that the June 26 deal does not set a timeline for either withdrawal or disarmament — and said disarming Hezbollah by force could, at worst, trigger civil war.<br /> Under the deal, disarmament must be verified by a third party to enable the Israeli military to “progressively redeploy out of Lebanese territory.” Neither a third party nor a mechanism for verification has been established, Jouni said.<br /> “The timeline for the Israeli occupation, based on this formula, will take a long time.”<br /> <br /> <em><strong>Lebanon to propose bigger pilot zones</strong></em></p> <p> To speed the process, Lebanon intends to propose in talks with Israel next week that the occupied zone be divided into two or three large pilot zones encompassing dozens of towns, instead of Israel withdrawing village by village, the Lebanese military official said.<br /> But Israeli officials have said troops will remain in southern Lebanon as long as necessary, ​and residents of Israeli-occupied land doubt they will ever see their hometowns again.<br /> “How ​is Israel going to withdraw? It’s not that simple. They did the impossible to get in here; they aren’t just going to leave overnight,” said Zeinab Loubani, a 54-year-old mother displaced from a town near Zawtar Al-Gharbiyeh.<br /> “I’m telling you, I don’t believe it for a second. It’s all just talk ... There’s nothing left to hope for.”</p>

Read the original article on arabnews.com (opens in a new tab)

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Arab News

  1. 30 JulThe devastating impact of war on southern Lebanon’s farmers3.9
  2. 29 JulFew families return to southern Lebanese village as part of Israel ‘pilot zones’ deal2.5
  3. 29 JulLebanon probes prominent businessman’s meeting with Netanyahu2.8
  4. 29 JulIsrael army accuses Hezbollah of truce violation, launching drone in south Lebanon2.5
  5. 29 JulIsrael destroys schools in south Lebanon, hindering residents' return1.6

Everything we scored from Arab News