Euronews, on Iran, 2 November 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

Iran says it can reopen Hormuz in two days if US meets conditions

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.2 findings

Iran said on Monday it was ready to reopen the Strait of Hormuz within two days if the US accepted its conditions, having proposed a seven-day timeline when it first put the idea to Washington through Qatar in September."The possibility of implementing this plan in two days is another indication of Iran's good-faith approach," foreign ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baghaei said."We have stated that, if Iran's demands are met, it would be possible to restore security to the Strait of Hormuz and resume the negotiating process within a short period," he added.Baghaei said that an exchange of messages was ongoing with the US via mediators and that "everything depends" on the US side accepting Iran's demands.

"Only then can we discuss the subsequent stages," he explained.Tehran's conditions include ending the war on all fronts, unfreezing Iranian assets abroad, lifting sanctions on its oil sector, and ending the US naval blockade of Iranian ports.Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi set out further requirements in an Al Jazeera interview released on Sunday, saying Washington must also accept a new transit route through the strait agreed between Iran and Oman, reduce US troop numbers in the region, and remove sanctions imposed since August.Washington has rolled out a fresh wave of measures from August onwards, which it described as the "economic asphyxiation" of Iran., Tehran has claimed it maintained control over Hormuz, regularly targeting vessels that attempt to cross without its authorisation.

Meanwhile, the US imposed a naval blockade on Iranian ports.Diplomatic activity speeds upThe diplomatic activity comes as both Washington and Tel Aviv have intensified military threats. On Saturday, Trump said he still had to "take care" of one or two targets, including Pickaxe mountain in central Iran, a site Washington suspects houses nuclear infrastructure, which Tehran denies.Baghaei warned at Monday's briefing that "any act of aggression against Iran, any military attack against Iran, by whatever means, will be met with a powerful, immediate and comprehensive response from us."Iran's deputy foreign minister Kazem Gharibabadi travelled to Doha on Monday to help draft a preliminary agreement, with Qatar acting as mediator.China said it was sending its special envoy Zhai Jun to Iran, Oman and Saudi Arabia to press all sides to halt the fighting.

President Xi Jinping said the Middle East and Gulf must not become an arena for great-power competition. Beijing and Muscat jointly called on Washington and Tehran to return to the "Islamabad memorandum of understanding," Chinese state media reported.Officials in Tehran continued to set red lines. Deputy parliament speaker Ali Nikzad said Iran would not enter nuclear negotiations under pressure, and that previous talks had produced only broken promises.Mohsen Rezaei, secretary of Iran's Supreme National Security Council, said on Saturday that the US would need to meet Iran's conditions before talks could begin.

Rezaei said he had received a letter from US Vice President JD Vance but had not yet replied.US military command CENTCOM rejected Iranian claims that its strikes had targeted only military objectives. CENTCOM said on X that Iran had deliberately hit residential areas, civilian centres and civilian sailors in international waters, and that its attacks had killed at least 20 people.Anwar Gargash, adviser to the UAE president, told the Manama Dialogue conference in Bahrain that Abu Dhabi did not want a prolonged crisis with Iran but acknowledged that trust had been lost.

"This damage was not caused by us. Rather, following Iran's attack on us, trust was damaged," he said.

The diplomatic activity falls ahead of US midterm elections on Tuesday, in which economic pressures linked to the Iran war have increased the likelihood of Republican losses in Congress.The announcement of results on Wednesday coincides with the anniversary of the 1979 seizure of the US embassy in Tehran, during which 52 US diplomats were held for over a year. Tehran-organised demonstrations against the US are expected across the country, while billboards depicting Trump behind prison bars have been erected in Tehran in recent days.Trump said on Sunday evening that he and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu had held "very good" talks the previous day and discussed Iran, without elaborating.

Left out here: Drops what it reported before

The article reports that Trump and Netanyahu held 'very good' talks about Iran 'without elaborating', and that Netanyahu's office has not commented. It leaves out that Euronews reported the same morning that Netanyahu reportedly pressed Trump to strike Iran as soon as the US midterm vote was over. Without that fact a reader takes the content of the talks as unknown, when the outlet's own reporting said the Israeli prime minister was pushing for renewed strikes during the very diplomacy this article covers.

How we know

Netanyahu's office has not commented on the meeting.Since Israeli voters went to the polls last Tuesday, Netanyahu has spoken publicly only about the vote. Results remain inconclusive, with preliminary assessments suggesting he may not secure a coalition, although no alternative government has taken shape.

Read the original article on euronews.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (2)

Euronews reports Iran's offer to reopen the Strait of Hormuz within two days and mostly attributes each side's claims with care. It says only that the war 'broke out' in late February, though Euronews itself reported days earlier that the war began with US and Israeli strikes. It also leaves out its own same-day report that Netanyahu reportedly pressed Trump to resume strikes.

  1. Drops what it reported before

    Minor

    “Since the Iran war broke out in late February”

    Why this matters
    Euronews writes that the war 'broke out', as if it simply happened, and the article names no party that started it anywhere.
    The impression it gives
    A reader does not learn who started the war. They meet Iranian threats of a 'powerful, immediate and comprehensive response', a UAE official citing 'Iran's attack on us' and CENTCOM's charges against Iran, and may take Iran to be the side that began the fighting.
    The context
    Euronews reported on 27 October that the war began with US and Israeli strikes on Iran in late February. The Guardian's report on the same talks says the war was started by the US and Israel in February. The article drops that fact.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

  2. Drops what it reported before

    Minor

    What is missing

    The article reports that Trump and Netanyahu held 'very good' talks about Iran 'without elaborating', and that Netanyahu's office has not commented. It leaves out that Euronews reported the same morning that Netanyahu reportedly pressed Trump to strike Iran as soon as the US midterm vote was over. Without that fact a reader takes the content of the talks as unknown, when the outlet's own reporting said the Israeli prime minister was pushing for renewed strikes during the very diplomacy this article covers.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Euronews

  1. 2 NovOil slides on Hormuz deal hopes but Trump keeps Iran strikes on the table3.0
  2. 1 NovIran’s supreme leader warns of 'geographically unrestricted response' if US attacks again3.0
  3. 29 OctJD Vance contacts senior Iranian official in bid to revive peace talks3.0
  4. 27 OctQatar urges Iran to 'show goodwill' by ending threats to the region and reopening the Strait of Hormuz0.0
  5. 26 OctFrom the Mecca defence pact to Tehran talks: Is the Middle East’s security landscape shifting?3.0

Everything we scored from Euronews