Middle East Eye, on UK Politics, 14 October 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

Burnham condemns 'Zionism is racism' motion and rules out coalition with Greens

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.2 findings

British Prime Minister Andy Burnham has condemned the Green Party's declaration that Zionism is a "form of racism" as antisemitic and said he will not support Labour forming a partnership with the Greens while they have that policy. In parliament on Wednesday, Conservative MP Harriett Baldwin urged Burnham to "rule out cooperating" with the Greens over the motion. The prime minister responded : "Can I condemn the motion that was passed unequivocally?"

"It is wrong, it is antisemitic, and this side of the house will have nothing to do with it," he declared. "We will always take the right response when it comes to any partnerships we have with other parties. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters "We cannot support a partnership with a party that holds the position that has recently been adopted."

Labour is in coalition with the Greens on multiple local councils. Downing Street would not confirm whether Burnham's position extended to local politics. Green Party members voted earlier this month at the party's annual conference to approve a motion declaring that "Zionism is racism" as party policy. The Green Party allows members to create official policy through a voting process at annual conferences, although senior Green figures have recently argued the process needs to be reformed.

Left out here: One side gets the space

The article never gives the Green leader's reply to Burnham's charge on the day. Polanski said he was the only Jewish leader of a political party and called the blurring of challenging Israel and antisemitism dangerous. Without it, a reader sees Burnham's antisemitism charge go unanswered by the party he accused.

How we know

However, the policy will not automatically make it into the Green Party's election manifesto. First major party to recognise Zionism as racism The party conference vote made the Greens the first major party in the UK to recognise Zionism as a form of racism - and to back a single democratic Palestinian state with equal rights for all ethnic and religious groups, rather than a two-state solution. The Israeli government responded immediately by banning Green Party leader Zack Polanski (who is himself Jewish), from entering Israel, accusing the Greens of antisemitism.

The United States said it would make “representations” to the British government over the issue, suggesting it could amount to antisemitism. Domestically, the Greens have been roundly condemned by opposing parties. More than a dozen Labour MPs even reported the party to the police over its "Zionism is racism" policy. Pro-Israel advocates hound Green Party members over 'Zionism is Racism' motion Read More » Polanski said last month, before it was passed, that the motion needed to be amended to say "very clearly and explicitly that this motion safeguards Jewish people".

"And what it means by that is if someone stands against the occupation, stands against apartheid, stands against the genocide, but happens to be a member of a synagogue that calls itself a Zionist synagogue, they should not be treated any differently within the Green Party," he said. The amendment, however, was defeated in a vote by members. , but co-deputy leader Mothin Ali told Middle East Eye hours before the vote he did not oppose the proposed amendment, saying that "if Jewish members feel like they need an additional level of reassurance, then I think they're right to ask for that".

"All members should feel safe in this party. Not that the motion should make them feel unsafe, but if they want an additional level of reassurance, I welcome that," he added. Ali said on Wednesday that the result of the vote on the motion must be respected. "As defined in the motion," Ali told MEE before it was passed, "Zionism is an ethno-nationalist state. Zionism is resulting in ethnic cleansing, in the belief that one group of people is superior to another."

Green MPs including Adrian Ramsay, Sian Berry and Ellie Chowns have publicly criticised the motion. It was endorsed by prominent Holocaust survivor and activist Stephen Kapos, who said he believed that "Zionism both as an ideology and practice is harmful and has no legitimacy and must be rejected". Copyright © 2014 - 2026 . Middle East Eye. All rights reserved. Only England and Wales jurisdiction apply in all legal matters. Middle East Eye ISSN 2634-2456

Read the original article on middleeasteye.net (opens in a new tab)
What we found (2)

Middle East Eye reports Andy Burnham's condemnation of the Green Party's Zionism motion and his refusal to back a partnership with the Greens, attributing the antisemitism charge to him and setting out the Greens' own positions. One sentence states in the outlet's own voice that the motion had no bearing on internal party processes, although the article's own reporting shows the Green leader wanted it amended to protect Jewish members. The piece also leaves out the Green leader's reply to Burnham on the day.

  1. States one side's claim as fact

    Minor

    “The motion concerned external matters and had no bearing on internal processes”

    Why this matters
    The words "had no bearing on internal processes" settle, in Middle East Eye's own voice, what the motion means for Green members. No source is named for this reading.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes it as established fact that the motion could never affect how Jewish or Zionist-identifying members are treated inside the party.
    The context
    The article itself shows this was disputed inside the party. Polanski said the motion needed an amendment to protect Jewish members, and that amendment was defeated. The scope of the motion is the Greens' supporters' reading, not a settled fact.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“the motion needed to be amended”
    • Elsewhere in the article“The amendment, however, was defeated in a vote by members.”

    Show it in the article

  2. One side gets the space

    Minor

    What is missing

    The article never gives the Green leader's reply to Burnham's charge on the day. Polanski said he was the only Jewish leader of a political party and called the blurring of challenging Israel and antisemitism dangerous. Without it, a reader sees Burnham's antisemitism charge go unanswered by the party he accused.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

What it gets right

  • “"It is wrong, it is antisemitic, and this side of the house will have nothing to do with it," he declared.”

    The antisemitism charge stays in Burnham's mouth as a quote. Middle East Eye does not adopt it as its own verdict.

  • “Downing Street would not confirm whether Burnham's position extended to local politics.”

    It tells the reader that Downing Street left open the limit of Burnham's pledge, set against the existing local coalitions reported in S7.

  • “banning Green Party leader Zack Polanski (who is himself Jewish), from entering Israel, accusing the Greens of antisemitism”

    It reports the Israeli government's response as an accusation and gives the reader the relevant fact that the leader it banned is Jewish.

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Middle East Eye

Everything we scored from Middle East Eye