Times of Israel, on Iran, 2 November 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

Conspiracy theorist Tucker Carlson claims Netanyahu pushing Trump to nuke Iran

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.3 findings

claimed Sunday that the United States, under pressure from Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, could soon launch a nuclear strike against Iran, amid reports that fighting could soon flare up again after months of relative calm. “Under pressure from Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu, the Trump administration may be within days of launching a nuclear strike on Iran,” Carlson claimed in a lengthy post on X. “The target would be Pickax Mountain in central Iran, where Israeli intelligence claims the Iranian government has restarted its nuclear enrichment program.”

“No conventional weapon in the American arsenal can penetrate 300 feet of solid granite to destroy the tunnels where enrichment is supposedly taking place,” declared Carlson, who has garnered criticism from former conservative allies for . “The only military option is a nuclear strike. Netanyahu has been pushing hard for one. ‘Bibi calls [US President Donald] Trump about it every day,’ says an informed observer,” Carlson continued.

Left out here: Drops what it reported before

The Times of Israel had reported, days earlier, that Netanyahu planned strikes on Iran and urged Trump to renew the fighting. It also reported that Trump and Netanyahu spoke by phone as the US laid plans to resume strikes. This article mentions none of it. Without it, a reader believes Carlson's claim that Netanyahu is pushing Trump towards war rests only on a conspiracy theorist's word. In fact the outlet's own reporting had carried such reports, although the Prime Minister's Office denied them. The nuclear element is what lacks any support.

How we know

He said that Netanyahu is “cornered and desperate” after losing his governing majority in last week’s election. “He can’t form a government unless Trump intervenes directly in Israeli politics… Netanyahu must stay close to Trump. He needs this war.” Get The Times of Israel's Daily Edition by email and never miss our top stories Newsletter email address Get it By signing up, you agree to the terms Carlson did not explain how he reached the conclusion that renewed war would mean a US nuclear strike, only warning that such a strike would “radically accelerate the destruction” caused by the previous round of fighting across the Middle East and Gulf.

“Fallout from a ground explosion at Pickax Mountain would contaminate the Persian Gulf, poisoning the water supply for 100 million people,” Carlson claimed. “And those are just some of the immediate consequences for the region. The rest of the world is every bit as exposed. No country other than the United States has ever used a nuclear weapon in war. Some would like to. An American nuclear attack on Iran would set a new precedent.” This handout satellite image courtesy of Vantor shows vehicles at the western entrance of the Pickaxe Mountain tunnel complex adjacent to the Natanz Nuclear Facility near Natanz, Isfahan province, central Iran, on June 21, 2026. (Satellite image ©2026 Vantor/AFP) “After the first nuclear strike, World War Three is inevitable.

That war would be short and final,” Carlson prophesized, predicting that “hundreds of millions of people” will be killed “if Trump is pushed by Netanyahu into launching a nuclear strike next week.” Advertisement As of Monday evening, Israel time, the post had been viewed more than 60 million times. Social media users pointed out that Carlson has predicted an imminent US nuclear strike on Iran several times since April. Pickaxe Mountain has been flagged by Western intelligence as a site likely used to store nuclear material, and has not been struck yet by the US in the war.

Trump has mentioned the site as a prime target if strikes are resumed, telling reporters on Saturday, “You probably could look at Pickaxe Mountain, and you have to take care of that.” But Trump, in September, publicly scorned the idea of a nuclear attack on Iran. Asked whether he had ruled out using a nuclear weapon against Iran, he said that he had, calling the question “stupid.” “I would never say that but the answer is yes,” Trump told a reporter in the Oval Office.

“There is no reason for it… What a stupid question.” Advertisement “They’re totally defeated militarily, and now I should use a nuclear weapon on them? What a stupid question,” he repeated. US President Donald Trump stands on stage after speaking at a campaign rally at the Salina Regional Airport, in Salina Kansas, November 1, 2026. (Jacquelyn Martin/AP) Israel and the US launched a joint campaign against Iran on February 28 and destroy its nuclear and ballistic missile capacities.

Iran responded with missile and drone strikes across the region, including at Israel, as well as by blockading the Strait of Hormuz, choking oil deliveries and rattling the global economy. A stalemate in the war has persisted for months, alongside stalled talks on a permanent ceasefire and Iran’s nuclear program. The White House in May accused Carlson of spreading “fake news” a day after he told an Israeli news station that Netanyahu had dragged the US into the war with Iran.

In his podcast, “The Tucker Carlson Show,” the host regularly blasts Israel in terms that many describe as evoking classic antisemitic tropes. He has also, in the past, denied that Hamas is a terror group, saying it “seems more like a political organization.” He has also hosted avowed antisemites such as Nick Fuentes. Carlson visited Israel in February to interview US Ambassador Mike Huckabee, who invited him for the talk after the podcaster criticized him on a show.

Israel initially considered barring Carlson from entering the country for the expected visit, but decided against the move so as not to cause a “diplomatic incident,” according to a Channel 13 report at the time. After his brief visit, Carlson claimed the Israeli government targeted his family, called the Jewish state “probably the most violent country on earth,” and . Is our live election coverage important to you?

Are you relying on The Times of Israel for accurate and timely coverage of the 2026 Israeli election? If so, please join The Times of Israel Community. For as little as $6/month, you will: Support our independent journalists who are working around the clock to report political developments as they unfold; Read ToI with a clear, ads-free experience on our site, apps and podcasts; and Gain access to exclusive content shared only with the ToI Community, including our DocuNation streaming film series and weekly letters from founding editor David Horovitz.

Join The Times of Israel Community JOIN NOW Already a member? Sign in to stop seeing this You're a dedicated reader We’re really pleased that you’ve read X Times of Israel articles in the past month. That’s why we started the Times of Israel - to provide discerning readers like you with must-read coverage of Israel and the Jewish world. So now we have a request. Unlike other news outlets, we haven’t put up a paywall. But as the journalism we do is costly, we invite readers for whom The Times of Israel has become important to help support our work by joining The Times of Israel Community.

For as little as $6 a month you can help support our quality journalism while enjoying The Times of Israel AD-FREE , as well as accessing exclusive content available only to Times of Israel Community members. Thank you, David Horovitz, Founding Editor of The Times of Israel Join Our Community Join Our Community Already a member? Sign in to stop seeing this Most Popular 1 Eisenkot vows to swiftly utilize Knesset majority ‘against Oct. 7 government’ 2 Trump holds call with Netanyahu amid preparations to renew strikes on Iran — report 3 Trump said weighing whom to scapegoat for Iran war as he clashes with Netanyahu over renewed attack 4 Meet the 120 members of the incoming Knesset 5 Interview How France betrayed the little Jewish girls in white dresses immortalized by Renoir 6 Bennett, Golan pledge to back Eisenkot for PM, as bloc mulls which coalition to seek 7 Analysis Netanyahu lost his majority, but can the opposition form a government?

A look at possible paths ahead 8 ‘Stop climbing trees’: Herzog offers party leaders ladders down, urges ‘open minds’ to avoid another election read more: Israel & the Region 2026 US-Israel war with Iran nuclear weapons Pickaxe Mountain Tucker Carlson If you’d like to comment, join The Times of Israel Community. JOIN THE TOI COMMUNITY Already a member? Log in here close popup Sign in or Join The Times of Israel Community Sign in or Register Paying ToI Community members are invited to comment on articles Email address * Please use the following structure: example@domain.com Continue Or Continue with By joining you agree to the terms and conditions Send me The Times of Israel Daily Edition back close popup Register to continue Email address * Change REGISTER Or Continue with back close popup Log in to continue Email address * Something went wrong.

Please try again in a few minutes.. Continue back close popup Sign in or Join The Times of Israel Community Sign in or Register You are currently registered. Please join The Times of Israel Community to comment and enjoy other Community benefits Only ToI Community members can comment below articles Email address * Password * Incorrect password. Please try again or choose an option below. Forgot your password? / Send me a login link Continue Sign in without joining Or Continue with close popup Check your email We sent an email to you at .

It has a link that will sign you in. Click the link in that email to complete registration so you can comment. back close popup Join The Times of Israel Community Commenting is available for paying members of The Times of Israel Community only. Please join our Community to comment and enjoy other Community benefits. Email address * Please use the following structure: example@domain.com JOIN NOW! close popup Thank you! Now check your email You are now a member of The Times of Israel Community!

We sent you an email with a login link to . Once you're set up, you can start enjoying Community benefits and commenting.

Read the original article on timesofisrael.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (3)

The Times of Israel reports Tucker Carlson's claim that Netanyahu is pushing Trump towards a nuclear strike on Iran, and sets it against Trump's own public rejection of nuclear use. In its own voice it brands Carlson's rhetoric antisemitic as plain fact, although elsewhere it attributes that charge to what 'many describe'. It also calls him a conspiracy theorist without telling readers that its own earlier reporting carried reports of Netanyahu pressing Trump to renew strikes.

  1. Smears a named person

    Minor

    “his antisemitic and anti-Israel rhetoric”

    Why this matters
    The Times of Israel states in its own voice that Carlson's rhetoric is antisemitic. It folds 'anti-Israel' into the same phrase, as though criticism of the Israeli state and antisemitism were one charge.
    The impression it gives
    The reader takes it as established fact that Carlson's statements are antisemitic, and that his criticism of Israel is part of that antisemitism.
    The context
    The article gives no example of an antisemitic statement here. When it does address the charge, it attributes it: the host blasts Israel 'in terms that many describe as evoking classic antisemitic tropes'. The outlet hedges the charge in one place and states it flatly in another.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“in terms that many describe as evoking classic antisemitic tropes”

    Show it in the article

    “aired numerous antisemitic tropes”

    Why this matters
    The outlet asserts in its own narration that Carlson aired 'numerous antisemitic tropes'. It names none of them. It lists the charge next to his calling Israel 'probably the most violent country on earth'.
    The impression it gives
    The reader believes Carlson's remarks after his Israel visit were demonstrably antisemitic, and may read his description of Israel as one of those tropes.
    The context
    Criticising a state's violence is not a trope about Jews. The article quotes nothing that would let a reader judge the charge for themselves. Its own earlier framing in S38 presents this as what others say, not as fact.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“many describe as evoking classic antisemitic tropes”

    Show it in the article

  2. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “Far-right commentator and conspiracy theorist Tucker Carlson”

    Why this matters
    The outlet opens with two verdict labels in its own voice, 'far-right' and 'conspiracy theorist', before reporting what Carlson said. The headline repeats the second label.
    The impression it gives
    The reader is told to dismiss the whole post as conspiracy before weighing any part of it.
    The context
    The article does show Carlson has predicted an imminent nuclear strike several times. But the labels also cover his claim that Netanyahu is pressing Trump for strikes, which the outlet's own earlier reporting had carried as reported fact.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    “in a bid to destabilize the regime”

    Why this matters
    The outlet calls Iran's government 'the regime' in its own narration. It also states the aims of the US-Israeli attack as fact, not as what Washington and Israel said they were.
    The impression it gives
    The reader takes 'regime' as a neutral description, and takes the attackers' stated aims as established purpose.
    The context
    'Regime' is a verdict word with no attribution. 'Iran's government' carries the same information without the verdict.

    Show it in the article

  3. Drops what it reported before

    Minor

    What is missing

    The Times of Israel had reported, days earlier, that Netanyahu planned strikes on Iran and urged Trump to renew the fighting. It also reported that Trump and Netanyahu spoke by phone as the US laid plans to resume strikes. This article mentions none of it. Without it, a reader believes Carlson's claim that Netanyahu is pushing Trump towards war rests only on a conspiracy theorist's word. In fact the outlet's own reporting had carried such reports, although the Prime Minister's Office denied them. The nuclear element is what lacks any support.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Times of Israel

  1. 2 NovDaily Briefing Nov. 2 – After midterms, will US reignite Iran War?0.0
  2. 2 NovIran says considering two-day plan to reopen Hormuz if US meets its ‘demands’3.0
  3. 1 NovIranian army: War could be longer than previous one, Trump won’t dictate its duration0.0
  4. 1 NovTrump holds call with Netanyahu amid preparations to renew strikes on Iran — report6.0
  5. 1 NovReport: Netanyahu pressed Trump to resume Iran war after US ...0.0

Everything we scored from Times of Israel