Metro, on Iran, 1 November 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

Iran designates RAF and Royal Navy as 'terrorist organisations'

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.3 findings

The UK has deployed miiltary assets to the Middle East and has shot down Iranian-made drones during the conflict (Picture: JUSTIN TALLIS / AFP via Getty Images) Iran has designated the Royal Air Force and Royal Navy as ‘terrorist organisations’ and warned the UK will ‘bear responsibility for their consequences’ Tehran also classified the UK secret service MI6 as a ‘hostile group’ and condemned the British government’s ‘anti-Iranian policies’.

The move is in retaliation for the UK’s decision to designate Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) as a threat to national security in July. Iran’s Foreign Ministry said their decision was ‘in response to the British government’s hostile actions against the Islamic Republic of Iran over the past year.’ US bombers used RAF Fairford in Gloucestershire to strike Iran (Picture: Matthew Horwood/Getty Images) Their statement continued: ‘Including its involvement in the US-Israeli imposed war against Iran through the provision of military and logistical bases and facilities located in territories under British jurisdiction, as well as that government’s decision on July 13, 2026 to place the Islamic Revolution Guard Corps (IRGC) under the State Threats Act 2026.’

The Foreign Ministry also warned: ‘It is self-evident that these measures have been adopted in accordance with the principles of international law and within the framework of the principle of reciprocity, and the British government shall bear responsibility for their consequences.’ The British Military has been involved in shooting down Iranian drones . The RAF has shot down more than 100 unmanned aircraft targeting British forces and coalition bases.

Iran has also fired missiles at British military bases at Diego Garcia and in Cyprus. The UK also deployed a warship, HMS Dragon, to the Middle East in March to join an international mission to safeguard shipping in the Strait of Hormuz. Iran is retaliating after the UK designated the IRGC in July (Picture: Morteza Nikoubazl/NurPhoto via Getty Images) In July, Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood announced new powers to ban support for the IRGC, linked to death threats and intimidation in the UK.

UK counter terrorism specialist Roger Macmillan warned Iran’s move could ‘legitimise and encourage’ , including ‘defence infrastructure and military sites’. He added: ‘This can induce a state of fear in people, because of what they think may or may not happen. Terror is not just about the acts, it’s about the fear.’ Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@metro.co.uk. For more stories like this, check our news page.

Read the original article on metro.co.uk (opens in a new tab)
What we found (3)

Metro reports Iran's designation of the RAF and Royal Navy accurately and quotes the Iranian Foreign Ministry at length. In its own voice it writes of 'the outbreak of war' without saying the US and Israel launched it, calls Iran's government 'the regime', and adds the label 'proxy attacks' outside the expert's quoted words.

  1. Hides who did it

    Minor

    “since the outbreak of war in the Middle East earlier this year”

    Why this matters
    The words 'the outbreak of war' make the war something that broke out on its own, with no one who started it.
    The impression it gives
    The war simply began, and the UK's role was to defend itself by shooting down Iranian drones and protecting bases from Iranian missiles.
    The context
    Anadolu reports that the US and Israel launched attacks on Iran on 28 February, which triggered Iranian retaliation across the region. The article names the US-Israeli war only inside Iran's quoted statement and in a photo caption about US bombers. It never says in its own voice who started the war that Iran's designation responds to.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

  2. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “a powerful arm of the regime”

    Why this matters
    Metro calls Iran's government 'the regime' in its own narration, with no attribution.
    The impression it gives
    Iran's government is an illegitimate 'regime', and that is a neutral description rather than a verdict.
    The context
    Elsewhere the article uses neutral names such as 'Iran's Foreign Ministry' and 'Tehran'. 'Regime' is a verdict the outlet adds in its own voice.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“Iran’s Foreign Ministry said their decision”

    Show it in the article

  3. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “proxy attacks against the UK”

    Why this matters
    Metro adds the word 'proxy' outside the quotation marks it gives Roger Macmillan, in its own paraphrase.
    The impression it gives
    Groups acting on Iran's behalf are an established category poised to attack the UK.
    The context
    Only 'legitimise and encourage' and 'defence infrastructure and military sites' are in quotation marks. 'Proxy attacks' is the outlet's own label for unnamed actors, and nothing in the article identifies who these proxies would be.

    Show it in the article

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Metro

  1. 20 OctTwo men re-arrested for helping 'Iran intelligence' in RAF Fairford probe6.0
  2. 15 OctUS considers using the Mother of All Bombs against Iran - how powerful is it?6.0
  3. 12 OctIran 'almost certainly' coordinated RAF Fairford incident says Burnham3.0
  4. 6 OctTrump jokes about letting Iran bomb Los Angeles and San Diego3.0
  5. 28 SeptRAF Fairford incident carries 'all the hallmarks of Iranian involvement'6.0

Everything we scored from Metro