The Guardian, on Gaza, 19 October 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

Cuts force World Food Programme to end support for half a million Palestinians in Gaza

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.2 findings

This winter is likely to deepen hunger for Palestinians in Gaza, after sweeping aid cuts forced the UN’s World Food Programme (WFP) to end support for more than half a million people each month, the agency’s director for Palestine said.

More than a year after a Trump-brokered ceasefire came into force, promised reconstruction has not begun, there are few jobs and the vast majority in Gaza still rely on aid to eat.

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

The article says a ceasefire came into force more than a year ago but never says that Israeli forces still hold more than 60% of Gaza and carry out almost daily airstrikes, as Reuters reported the same day. A reader may take the ceasefire as having ended the attacks.

How we know

This summer, WFP programmes helped feed three-quarters of Gaza’s population, about 1.6 million people, but funding has fallen by more than half from 2025 levels.

As a result, from October, aid has been scaled back to 1.1 million people each month. Cuts to deliveries of ration boxes, cash stipends to buy food in markets, and hot meals at community kitchens have already been rolled out.

The WFP needs more than £300m over the next six months to restore and maintain critical programmes in Palestine.

A year of large aid shipments ended a famine declared in summer 2025 and reduced the most severe hunger, but without steps to rebuild Gaza’s economy, most families still rely on food handouts.

“These are very fragile gains, easily reversed, and the situation is still brutal,” said Shaun Hughes, the WFP’s representative and country director for Palestine.

Two-thirds of the population in Gaza face crisis levels of food insecurity, phase three under the Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC), which is used to assess if a population is approaching famine.

Food insecurity is at emergency levels for 200,000 Palestinians, which means immediate humanitarian supplies are needed to prevent deaths from hunger, Hughes said. This is IPC phase four, one step away from famine conditions.

Young children and their mothers are particularly vulnerable. After enduring years of food shortages, one in eight children in Gaza are chronically malnourished or stunted, a recent Unicef survey found, and may have suffered permanent damage.

Humanitarian aid will be needed at scale until Israel and the international community launch the large-scale reconstruction promised last year. There is no way for most people to feed their own families at present, because about 80% of Gaza’s population is unemployed, according to UN data.

“We need to invest in recovery. This humanitarian operation isn’t affordable or sustainable in the long term,” Hughes said. “Ultimately that’s also what everyone in Gaza is telling us. They really don’t want to be reliant on these handouts, don’t want to stand in the hot meals queue every day. They want to have some chance of stability and recovery.”

Gaza was self-sufficient in fruit and vegetables before the war, but the vast majority of farmland has been occupied by Israel’s military. The sophisticated greenhouse and irrigation systems that supported agricultural production have been destroyed.

Fish has historically been a key source of protein in the territory, but the Israeli navy bars fishing boats from waters off the coast.

Alaa Sarhan, 40, lives with his wife and five children aged between four and 16 in a tent near the “yellow line” the marker of Israeli control. They have already noticed the impact of the WFP cuts.

“In recent days, we have had to plan our meals around what is available rather than what we want to eat,” he said. A former paramedic, he was injured by Israeli attacks nearly two decades ago, and his disability benefits buy very little.

“Often, I give up my share of food so my children can eat. I got accustomed to doing this because the most important thing is that they have something to eat.”

For three years, Israeli restrictions on aid shipments have been the main driver of hunger and malnutrition in Gaza. For months at a time, entry of food was restricted or entirely barred as Palestinians went hungry inside the territory.

Now, for the first time since October 2023, lack of funds may also become an obstacle to feeding hungry Palestinians. Israel’s controls on shipments into Gaza exacerbate funding shortfalls, because they make humanitarian work particularly expensive compared with other parts of the world.

Limits on fuel, engine oil and spare parts, and complex, opaque shipping restrictions push up transport time and costs. means warehouse space is limited and costly.

Even an influx of cash might not allow the WFP to immediately reverse the cuts. Sourcing and shipping the ingredients for ration boxes can take about three months, and the reduction of cash transfers may already be affecting supply chains.

The injection of more than £30m a month has “underpinned purchasing power for the private sector in Gaza”, Hughes said, allowing trucks to come in with relatively expensive shipments of both healthy and unhealthy food.

For now, the WFP has tried to reduce the impact of funding cuts by scaling back these programmes rather than cutting them entirely. Families who get ration boxes will receive one, rather than two.

But even limited reductions may push families with no other food source or income back into dangerous levels of malnutrition. For the poorest of the poor, reduced rations don’t work, Hughes said. “There’s only so far you can cut [support] until you don’t have the food security impact at the household level.”

The WFP is trying to monitor hunger levels so they reach the most vulnerable, monitoring “negative coping strategies”. These include whether people have skipped meals, or are seeking exploitative and dangerous work.

Nesreen Muqayed, 50, lives with her husband, four children and two grandchildren. She needs a regular diet to manage kidney problems, and a grandson who is on the autism spectrum cannot tolerate many foods.

Despite these urgent medical needs, they often go hungry. “Sometimes we try to save part of a meal for breakfast because we do not know whether we will have anything to eat the following day,” Muqayed said. “The situation has become more difficult over the past two weeks.”

The hot meals from community kitchens that make up a large part of their diet have only been delivered every other day in October, and their meagre backup supplies are already running out.

“I used the last of our flour yesterday,” she said. Beyond grappling with daily hunger, she also finds it painful denying her children healthy food they want and need for their development, because they cannot even afford bananas.

“Sometimes I pass a fruit seller and look at what he has on display, but I do not have the money to buy,” she said. “Fruit and vegetables have become luxuries that we cannot afford regularly, even though they are basic necessities that every family should be able to access.”

Read the original article on theguardian.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (2)

The Guardian reports the WFP's cuts to food support for half a million Palestinians in Gaza. It names Israel's aid restrictions as the main driver of hunger and gives Palestinians names, ages and their own voices. Its faults are small: one sentence on destroyed buildings names no attacker, and the article does not say that Israeli forces still carry out almost daily airstrikes despite the ceasefire.

  1. Hides who did it

    Minor

    “Mass destruction of buildings by airstrikes”

    Why this matters
    The words "by airstrikes" say what destroyed the buildings but not whose airstrikes they were.
    The impression it gives
    A reader is told buildings were destroyed from the air without being told in this sentence who carried out the strikes.
    The context
    Reuters reports on the same day that Israeli forces conduct almost daily airstrikes in Gaza. The article names Israel elsewhere, so the gap is small, but this sentence leaves the attacker out.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

  2. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    The article says a ceasefire came into force more than a year ago but never says that Israeli forces still hold more than 60% of Gaza and carry out almost daily airstrikes, as Reuters reported the same day. A reader may take the ceasefire as having ended the attacks.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

What it gets right

  • “Israeli restrictions on aid shipments have been the main driver of hunger and malnutrition in Gaza”

    The article names who caused the hunger in its own voice. It does not leave it as a shortage with no cause.

  • “the vast majority of farmland has been occupied by Israel’s military”

    The article names the party that took Gaza's farmland. It does not present the loss of food production as a natural decline.

  • “Alaa Sarhan, 40, lives with his wife and five children aged between four and 16”

    The article gives Palestinians names, ages and their own words. They do not appear only as figures.

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The Guardian

  1. 23 OctUnder Fire by Humza Yousaf – a deeply affecting story of being stranded in Gaza0.0
  2. 17 Oct‘I cannot carry all of this alone’: the couples kept apart by the war in Gaza3.0
  3. 16 Oct‘Tough to watch, impossible to ignore’: reviewers on NAZA documentary0.0
  4. 16 OctCalling the shots: what NAZA says about perpetrator cinema0.0
  5. 16 OctJonathan Glazer says Israel’s retaliation over NAZA ‘more venal’ than anticipated0.0

Everything we scored from The Guardian

See how 51 outlets covered this story