← the leaderboard

Arutz Sheva / Israel National News · Gaza · 29 Jul 2026

The headline editorialises, one side gets far more space, and the ceasefire blame is one-sided.

3.9
/ 10 · article score
scored on 5 of 10 measures

The double standard

The article grants the IDF named agency and quoted justification for every action while Hamas and civilian casualties receive no named actor, no attributed source, and no countervailing voice.

How it builds, in IDF strikes and weapons cache passage

  1. IDF named as actor for strikes

    the IDF struck and dismantled several Hamas weapons storage facilities in the central and northern Gaza Strip

    Named actor with active verb

  2. No actor named: who established it?

    One of the storage facilities had been established inside a mosque in the northern Gaza Strip

    Agentless passive, actor omitted

  3. IDF characterisation quoted at length, uncontested

    This is as additional example of the terrorist organizations in the Gaza Strip exploiting civilian infrastructure for terrorist purposes by storing weapons in the heart of the civilian population, including in religious sites, to facilitate terrorist activity

    Single source, no qualification or rebuttal

  4. Civilian harm risk acknowledged via IDF passive

    Prior to the strikes, advance warnings were provided to the civilian population to mitigate the risk of harm to them

    Agentless passive softens IDF responsibility; no civilian casualty figure given

  5. IDF intent claim stated as fact, no attribution hedge

    the weapons were intended to be used against IDF troops operating in the Yellow Line area and against Israeli civilians, and were dismantled in order to remove the threat

    IDF assertion presented without qualifying language

  6. IDF compliance with ceasefire asserted, Hamas side absent

    IDF troops under the Southern Command remain deployed in the area in accordance with the ceasefire agreement and will continue to operate to remove any threat

    One side's ceasefire conduct sourced and stated; other side unheard

The same decision, both sides

Whether the actor is named in the sentence

The IDF is named as the active subject every time it acts.

the IDF struck and dismantled several Hamas weapons storage facilities

Hamas is never named as the actor when its alleged conduct is described; an agentless passive is used instead.

One of the storage facilities had been established inside a mosque in the northern Gaza Strip

Whether claims are attributed and qualified or stated as plain fact

The IDF's assertion about weapons intent is stated as established fact with no hedging language.

the weapons were intended to be used against IDF troops operating in the Yellow Line area and against Israeli civilians

No Hamas, civilian, or independent source is quoted anywhere in the article to contest or qualify any IDF claim.

This is as additional example of the terrorist organizations in the Gaza Strip exploiting civilian infrastructure for terrorist purposes

Whether civilian harm is quantified or left abstract

The IDF's precautionary steps for civilians are mentioned, lending the IDF a protective character.

advance warnings were provided to the civilian population to mitigate the risk of harm to them

No figure, name, or account of actual civilian harm is provided, leaving the reader with no basis to assess the claim.

storing weapons in the heart of the civilian population, including in religious sites

What a reader is left with. A reader is left believing the IDF acted lawfully and protectively against a cynical Hamas that endangered its own civilians, with no independent source, no Hamas response, and no civilian account offered to complicate that picture.

Every highlight is a quote the model flagged. Tap one — or a metric below — to see what it measures and why it scored the way it did.

Headline analysisPerspective allocationCeasefire framing

Hamas weapons cache found inside Gaza mosque

Over the past week, the IDF struck and dismantled several Hamas weapons storage facilities in the central and northern Gaza Strip. One of the storage facilities had been established inside a mosque in the northern Gaza Strip. "This is as additional example of the terrorist organizations in the Gaza Strip exploiting civilian infrastructure for terrorist purposes by storing weapons in the heart of the civilian population, including in religious sites, to facilitate terrorist activity," the IDF noted. Related articles: 'Unthinkable hypocrisy, Hamas will not change' Mansour Abbas refuses to condemn Hamas IDF strikes Hamas weapons sites after ceasefire violations IDF continues to deal blows to Hamas in central Gaza "Prior to the strikes, advance warnings were provided to the civilian population to mitigate the risk of harm to them." The IDF also emphasized that "the weapons were intended to be used against IDF troops operating in the Yellow Line area and against Israeli civilians, and were dismantled in order to remove the threat." "IDF troops under the Southern Command remain deployed in the area in accordance with the ceasefire agreement and will continue to operate to remove any threat."

Read the original article ↗