France 24 (English), on Iran, 27 September 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

Trump expects Iran talks next week after rejecting seven-day truce proposal

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.2 findings

Trump expects Iran talks next week after rejecting seven-day truce proposal

US President Donald Trump said on Sunday he expected talks with Iran to resume next week, despite rejecting Tehran’s proposal for a seven-day truce followed by the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz. Trump has raised the possibility of renewed air strikes on Iran, but told Axios he anticipated further negotiations.

US President Donald Trump said Sunday that he expects talks with Iran to resume in the coming week, despite his rejection of a truce proposal put forward by Tehran.

Iranian officials brought with them to the UN General Assembly in New York a plan for a seven-day truce followed by the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz shipping channel.

Trump dismissed the plan and has mused on resuming full-scale air strikes on Iranian targets, but he told the news platform Axios that he expects negotiations to resume.

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

The article describes Iran's plan only as a truce followed by the reopening of Hormuz. It never says the plan also offered to restart nuclear talks within a week, or that the US demands nuclear concessions. Without this, a reader sees the dispute only as Iran's list of demands and not as a gap over the nuclear issue.

How we know

"They want to make a deal, but it is not the deal that I want to make," Trump told Axios. "It is what we would have maybe agreed to a year ago."

"They overplayed their hand," Trump said, in the interview published Sunday.

Citing sources familiar with the matter, Axios reported that indirect talks between Washington and Tehran could take place as early as Monday.

On Sunday, Iran was still standing by its conditions for reopening the Strait of Hormuz, leaving the Gulf front of the Middle East war locked in a stalemate, while fighting rages in Yemen.

Read more'Iran has dragged us into this conflict,' top Emirati diplomat Anwar Gargash says

'We will not back down'

Hormuz is a key chokepoint for the world's energy supplies and is now central to the conflict between Washington and Tehran, which was started nearly seven months ago when the US and Israel launched a wave of strikes against Iran.

Iran's plan called for a cessation of all hostilities in the Middle East, including in Lebanon, according to Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, and a return to the conditions in an earlier ceasefire deal that fell apart.

That agreement, which collapsed during fighting over Hormuz, called for the release of frozen Iranian assets, the lifting of sanctions on Iranian oil and an end to the US naval blockade.

"Our conditions are clear, and any move toward reopening the Strait of Hormuz is contingent upon these conditions being fulfilled. We will not back down from them," Araghchi said on Sunday, state broadcaster IRIB reported.

"We have never closed the door to diplomacy or negotiations, but at the same time, we have never backed down from our rights."

Washington's ambassador to the UN, Mike Waltz, accused Tehran of demanding too much in exchange for a return to the negotiating table.

"This was, I think, a pretty cynical attempt to put something on the table that they knew was unacceptable. To ask for the release of the blockade, the sanctions, international sanctions and access to billions in assets, just to talk," he told NBC News in an interview broadcast Sunday.

"I think it's kind of common sense that the president doesn't have a lot of confidence this time after we just tried a few months ago."

Iran's Revolutionary Guards meanwhile said that they seized an American submersible drone on Sunday in the Strait of Hormuz.

It said the underwater vehicle was being used "for espionage purposes", adding that it was "now in the hands of the force's specialists for data recovery".

Read moreTehran offers US seven-day plan to open Strait of Hormuz

'Tool for pressure'

Washington and Tehran signed a memorandum of understanding in June aimed at ending the war, reopening the strait and launching talks on Iran's nuclear programme.

But the deal broke down shortly afterwards when Iran fired on commercial ships in Hormuz that it accused of deviating from its approved route through the waterway.

Iran requires ships to obtain authorization before passage, citing security and sovereignty reasons.

Ships that refuse to comply are regularly targeted, .

Araghchi said at the UN that Iran has conveyed to the United States, through Qatar, a concrete seven-day plan, adding: "The choice now rests with the United States."

Hossein Mohebi, a spokesman for Iran's Revolutionary Guards, was quoted by Tasnim news agency as saying: "We will not cease punishing the US until Iran's seven conditions are met."

Mohebi had told AFP in an exclusive interview on Tuesday that ending hostilities in Yemen was also among Tehran's demands.

(FRANCE 24 with AFP)

Read the original article on france24.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (2)

France 24 reports that Trump rejected Iran's seven-day proposal and still expects further talks. It attributes each side's claims and names the US and Israel as the ones who started the war on Iran. In its own voice it calls US bombing of Iranian coastal areas 'retaliation', and it never says that Iran's offer included restarting nuclear talks within a week.

  1. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “while the United States sporadically bombs Iranian coastal areas in retaliation”

    Why this matters
    In its own voice France 24 calls US bombing of Iranian coastal areas "in retaliation". In the same sentence Iran's actions are described plainly as ships being "regularly targeted".
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes US bombing as a justified response and Iran's actions as the starting point of each exchange.
    The context
    The article itself says the war was started by US and Israeli strikes on Iran, and that Iran cites security and sovereignty for its passage rules. Calling only the US bombing "retaliation" gives the US the verdict of a response. The facts in the article do not set the two apart that way.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“when the US and Israel launched a wave of strikes against Iran”
    • Elsewhere in the article“citing security and sovereignty reasons”

    Show it in the article

  2. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    The article describes Iran's plan only as a truce followed by the reopening of Hormuz. It never says the plan also offered to restart nuclear talks within a week, or that the US demands nuclear concessions. Without this, a reader sees the dispute only as Iran's list of demands and not as a gap over the nuclear issue.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

What it gets right

  • “which was started nearly seven months ago when the US and Israel launched a wave of strikes against Iran”

    It names who started the war, in the active voice.

  • “Iran's Revolutionary Guards meanwhile said that they seized an American submersible drone”

    It reports the Revolutionary Guards' claim as their claim and does not state it as fact.

  • “accused Tehran of demanding too much”

    It reports the US ambassador's charge as his accusation, not as the outlet's own verdict.

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from France 24 (English)

  1. 12 OctTehran denies involvement in UK Fairford air base incident as Britain summons Iranian ambassador3.0
  2. 4 OctIran says no military solution to war as peace talks with US stall3.0
  3. 4 OctIran tells US there is no military solution to Middle East war3.0
  4. 30 SeptBritish PM alleges there are 'strong indications' Iran was involved in Fairford airbase incident0.0
  5. 29 SeptIran says it expects US response Tuesday on plan to reopen Strait of Hormuz0.0

Everything we scored from France 24 (English)

See how 107 outlets covered this story