Arutz Sheva / Israel National News, on UK Politics, 5 November 2026

7.3out of 10Serious

Over two dozen arrested as UK Supreme Court hears Palestine Action case

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.3 findings

More than two dozen supporters of the Palestine Action were arrested outside the United Kingdom's Supreme Court on Wednesday as judges considered a legal challenge to the government's decision to designate the organization as a terrorist group, The Associated Press reported. The hearing marked another stage in the legal battle over the ban, which has resulted in the arrests of more than 3,000 Palestine Action supporters over the past year.

The British government outlawed the organization following a June 2025 incident in which its activists broke into a Royal Air Force base to protest British military assistance to Israel during the war in Gaza. The incident followed several other acts of vandalism attributed to the group. Under the designation, Palestine Action is classified alongside terrorist organizations such as Al-Qaeda and Hamas. Membership in or support for the organization can carry a prison sentence of up to 14 years.

Supporters of Palestine Action and civil liberties organizations have argued that arresting peaceful demonstrators under the ban violates freedom of expression and the right to protest. A lower court initially ruled that the government had acted unlawfully in proscribing the group, but five Court of Appeal judges overturned that decision in June. During Wednesday's hearing, , and that those cases qualified solely because they involved damage to property.

Meanwhile, demonstrators gathered outside the court to protest what they described as inconsistent enforcement of the law. Their signs referenced Sarah Helm, the wife of British national security adviser Jonathan Powell, who had publicly expressed support for Palestine Action without facing prosecution. Last month, because of her financial support for the organization.

Several authors subsequently defended Rooney, including Helm, who wrote on social media, “God help us authors who support Palestine and Palestine Action." London's Metropolitan Police reviewed Helm's post but determined that it did not constitute a criminal offense. Protesters on Wednesday displayed signs using similar language, substituting “authors" with descriptions including “normal people," “students" and “sons of Holocaust survivors."

Palestine Action was established in 2020, when activists vandalized the London headquarters of Israeli defense manufacturer Elbit Systems UK with red paint. The organization describes itself as a “direct action" network campaigning against what it calls British “complicity" with Israel, particularly through weapons sales. Its previous activities have included defacing a portrait of Lord Balfour at Trinity College, Cambridge, with paint and cuts, as well as removing two busts of Israel's first president, Chaim Weizmann, from a display cabinet at Manchester University.

Read the original article on israelnationalnews.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (3)

Arutz Sheva reports the arrests outside the Supreme Court and the hearing on the Palestine Action ban. It presents the count of three terrorist acts out of 385 as the defence lawyer's argument, when Reuters reports it as the government's own assessment. It also says booksellers were prohibited from selling Sally Rooney's books, which its own earlier report contradicts.

  1. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Serious

    “a lawyer representing Palestine Action argued that only three of the organization's 385 actions over five years met the legal definition of terrorism”

    Why this matters
    The words "a lawyer representing Palestine Action argued" present the figure of three out of 385 actions as the group's own claim in court.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes the figure as a self-serving count made by the banned group's defence.
    The context
    Reuters reports that government officials themselves had assessed, when the group was proscribed, that just three of 385 actions met the definition of terrorism. The article never says the figure came from the government's own assessment.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Palestine Action's lawyers told the court that, when the group was banned, government officials had themselves assessed that only three of its 385 actions over five years met the definition of terrorism.

  2. Drops what it reported before

    Serious

    “British booksellers were prohibited from selling works by Irish novelist Sally Rooney”

    Why this matters
    The words "booksellers were prohibited" tell the reader that a ban was imposed on selling Rooney's books.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes the state or a court barred booksellers from selling her work.
    The context
    Arutz Sheva's own report last month said Rooney announced her books would be withdrawn after her publisher concluded that distributing them could breach terrorism law. That was a publisher's decision taken over legal risk, not a prohibition on booksellers.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Last month Sally Rooney's books were withdrawn from sale in the UK after her publisher concluded that distributing them could breach terrorism law because of her financial support for the organisation.

  3. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “anti-Israel activist group”

    Why this matters
    In its own voice Arutz Sheva introduces Palestine Action as "anti-Israel".
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes the group's defining purpose to be hostility to Israel itself.
    The context
    Other reports of the same hearing describe it as a pro-Palestinian direct action group campaigning against arms supplies to Israel, and the article itself later gives the group's own description as a direct action network against British complicity through weapons sales.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Arutz Sheva / Israel National News

  1. 2 NovBBC admits vetting failure after hosting guest who praised October 70.0
  2. 28 OctTurning points3.0
  3. 26 OctUK Jewish leaders declare Green Party racist over 'Zionism is racism' policy0.0
  4. 22 OctBritain should be paying Israel reparations8.7
  5. 22 OctUK to overhaul Holocaust education following antisemitism in schools3.0

Everything we scored from Arutz Sheva / Israel National News