The Independent, on UK Politics, 15 November 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

McFadden: Staggered age of consent will be discussed to end abuses of power

Findings are available in the analysis below.1 finding

We do not republish articles from The Independent. Our findings are below, each quoting the words it is about. Read the full article on the outlet's own site.

Read the original article on independent.co.uk (opens in a new tab)
What we found (1)

The Independent reports a minister's and the opposition's responses to calls for a staggered age of consent after allegations against Russell Brand and David Walliams. It attributes the allegations carefully, gives Walliams's denial and explains the current law. One small lapse: in S20 the outlet's own voice describes Mia Latter's rape allegation as being "mistreated", although S5 has already told the reader she alleges rape.

  1. Softens the allegation

    Minor

    “alleged she had been mistreated by jailed comedian Brand”

    Why this matters
    The word "mistreated" restates Mia Latter's allegation in the outlet's own voice as something much milder than what she alleges.
    The impression it gives
    A reader starting at this paragraph could think she alleges some lesser wrong rather than rape.
    The context
    Earlier in the same article the outlet says she publicly claims she was raped by Brand at 16. The Guardian reports she alleged she was orally raped. The softer word sits beside the accurate one, so the overall picture survives.

    How we know

What it gets right

  • “Under UK law, adults of any age are legally able to have sex with 16 and 17-year-olds.”

    It states the current law plainly, so the reader understands what a staggered age of consent would change.

  • “Walliams denies any wrongdoing.”

    It reports the accused man's denial and keeps the allegations against him attributed throughout, rather than presenting them as established.

  • “he is now serving a 10-and-a-half-year prison term for one count of rape and three sexual assaults”

    It states Brand's convictions and sentence precisely and keeps them separate from allegations that have not been tried.

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The Independent

  1. 15 NovBenefits will be cut for some, minister confirms ahead of Milburn review on Neets crisis3.0
  2. 15 NovMcFadden says some people will lose benefits in future as Neets review looms3.0
  3. 15 NovMcFadden says some people will lose benefits in future as Neets review looms0.0
  4. 15 NovTaxpayer-funded youth jobs scheme to be expanded in bid to tackle Neets rise0.0
  5. 15 NovGovernment ‘considering’ change in age of consent laws following Brand allegations3.0

Everything we scored from The Independent