i24News, on West Bank, 26 October 2026

i24News reports eight new Israeli outposts in the South Hebron Hills without once saying the land is occupied or that settlements there are illegal under international law. It writes the two Palestinians shot dead at a military checkpoint out of their own deaths with the word "eliminated", labels them "terrorists" in its own voice on an army preliminary investigation alone, and puts the Israeli terror designation and an army inference about a planned "major attack" in its own voice. It also reduces the sealing of Hebron, which the same outlet reported a day earlier as 1,500 Palestinians forced to flee their homes, to "A closure was imposed on several villages".

9.6

Severe

out of 10

What we found

  1. Writes the death out

    Severe

    “were eliminated by the deputy battalion commander”

    What the words do
    The word "eliminated" replaces the fact that Israeli officers shot two men dead.
    What a reader comes away believing
    A reader takes away that a threat was switched off, not that two named men were killed by soldiers.
    What is actually the case
    i24News itself reported three days earlier that "IDF troops killed both after a brief pursuit", and the outlet's earlier report names them as Ahmd and Hamouda Al-Jabari.

    Show it in the article

    “flanked and eliminated the terrorists”

    What the words do
    A second use of "eliminated" turns a 20-minute shooting in which soldiers killed two men into a tactical manoeuvre.
    What a reader comes away believing
    A reader understands the episode as an operation completed rather than as two men shot dead at a checkpoint.
    What is actually the case
    The same outlet wrote plainly days before that troops killed both men; nothing in this article uses any word for killing about the two Palestinians.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Israeli occupation forces shot dead two Palestinian men from Hebron at a military checkpoint near Yehuda Junction after an exchange of fire lasting about 20 minutes.

  2. Labels people on one side's word

    Severe

    “The two terrorists”

    What the words do
    i24News calls the two men killed "terrorists" in its own voice, with no attribution anywhere in the sentence.
    What a reader comes away believing
    A reader takes it as established fact that the dead men were terrorists.
    What is actually the case
    Every detail of the account in this article comes from the Israeli army, which the article itself shows when it says the IOF is examining the attack and had no specific warning.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“the IDF is also examining the possibility”

    Show it in the article

    “the two terrorists are relatives from the Jaab family”

    What the words do
    The label is repeated and extended to a named family said to be "affiliated with Hamas", on the basis of an unnamed "preliminary investigation".
    What a reader comes away believing
    A reader believes a whole Hebron family has been shown to be a Hamas family.
    What is actually the case
    The only source given is a preliminary army investigation, and the outlet's own earlier report named the two men as Ahmd and Hamouda Al-Jabari, not Jaab.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    The Israeli army says the two men, both from Hebron, were armed and on their way to carry out an attack; that account has not been independently verified.

  3. Hedges the documented record

    Severe

    “Eight new outposts have begun to be established in the South Hebron Hills area, with the approval of the IDF”

    What the words do
    The article reports the creation of eight settlement outposts as an administrative decision and never states their legal status.
    What a reader comes away believing
    A reader believes new Israeli outposts in the South Hebron Hills are a lawful planning matter approved by the army.
    What is actually the case
    The ICJ found in July 2024 that Israel's settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem are illegal under international law and the occupation itself unlawful; the article never uses the words occupied, unlawful or international law.

    How we know

    • On the recordThe International Court of Justice's July 2024 advisory opinion found Israel's occupation of the West Bank and East Jerusalem unlawful.icj-cij.org (opens in a new tab)
    • On the recordThe International Court of Justice's July 2024 advisory opinion found Israel's settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem illegal under international law.icj-cij.org (opens in a new tab)

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Eight new outposts are being established in the South Hebron Hills with Israeli army approval, in territory the International Court of Justice ruled in July 2024 is unlawfully occupied and where it found Israeli settlements illegal under international law.

  4. Drops what it reported before

    Serious

    “A closure was imposed on several villages in the area.”

    What the words do
    A single passive sentence with no actor stands in for the measures imposed on Hebron and its surroundings.
    What a reader comes away believing
    A reader believes the consequence for Palestinians was a traffic closure of some villages.
    What is actually the case
    i24News reported the previous day that Israeli army forces drove residents from their homes in western Hebron and that about 1,500 Palestinians from 250 families had been forced to flee, with thousands more at risk.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Israeli occupation forces sealed Hebron and surrounding villages and forced residents from their homes; the Hebron Municipality said about 1,500 Palestinians from 250 families had been made to flee.

  5. States one side's claim as fact

    Serious

    “following West Bank terror attack”

    What the words do
    The headline puts the Israeli designation of the shooting in the outlet's own voice with no attribution.
    What a reader comes away believing
    A reader takes it as settled that a terror attack occurred, rather than that this is the Israeli authorities' characterisation.
    What is actually the case
    The article's own account is of two men who fired at a military checkpoint manned by soldiers, killing two soldiers; the terror designation comes from the Israeli side alone.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“encountered a routine military checkpoint manned by IDF soldiers”

    Show it in the article

    “were apparently on their way to carry out a major attack”

    What the words do
    An Israeli army inference about intent is written in the outlet's own voice, softened only by "apparently".
    What a reader comes away believing
    A reader believes a larger attack was in preparation.
    What is actually the case
    The article itself records that the army had no specific warning about the men or the attack and is still examining what happened.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“there was no specific warning regarding the brothers or the attack”

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Israeli authorities called the shooting at Yehuda Junction, in which two soldiers were killed, a terror attack.

  6. Sanitises violence or disorder

    Minor

    “Clashes break out in Hebron as tensions spiral”

    What the words do
    i24News describes events in Hebron as clashes and spiralling tensions, as if two sides collided.
    What a reader comes away believing
    A reader pictures mutual street disorder in Hebron.
    What is actually the case
    The outlet's own report a day earlier described Israeli army forces forcing residents out of their homes and a closure of the city's entrances, which the Hebron governor called collective punishment.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

  7. Uses the occupation's words

    Minor

    “Hebron siege: Palestinians evacuate”

    What the words do
    The word "evacuate" presents people driven from their homes as leaving of their own accord.
    What a reader comes away believing
    A reader believes Hebron residents chose to move out because they feared what might come.
    What is actually the case
    i24News reported that Israeli army forces began forcing residents of Deir Bahha and Al-Jalda to leave their homes.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

Every underline is part of a finding. Press one to see why.

New settlement outposts have been established in Hebron Hills

and led by the South Hebron Regional Council and Minister Bezalel Smotrich. This comes after a terror attack at Yehuda Junction outside Hebron in which IDF soldiers Sergeant Major Ron Yonatan Roitman and Sergeant Yuval Shai Soilem were killed. As part of the decision, six farms have been established, and two more settlements are expected to be established. Regarding the decision, Minister Smotrich said, "We are continuing the settlement revolution, which includes measures of 'depart from evil,' mass demolition of illegal construction, alongside measures of 'do good,' approval of communities and farms, and the fortification and strengthening of the settlements." West Bank violence: During the attack, three more IDF soldiers were wounded and evacuated to Hadassah Ein Kerem and Shaare Zedek hospitals in Jerusalem—their condition is mild. of the "Ari" battalion and the company commander. Suggested articles amid fears of Gaza Scenario in the West Bank | i24NEWS Deadly shooting prompts West Bank closures days before Israeli election | i24NEWS Harvesting olives or headlines? Lander’s detention fuels West Bank dispute | Danna Avni A preliminary investigation indicates that in Hebron, which is affiliated with Hamas. The two, approximately 27 years old and from Hebron, . They were traveling in a vehicle with a yellow license plate and encountered a routine military checkpoint manned by IDF soldiers. During the exchange of fire, which lasted about 20 minutes, soldiers were wounded until the command post from the 101st Battalion and the Home Front Command . A large amount of ammunition was found in the back seat of the vehicle, with one of the terrorists holding a long rifle and another a pistol. Simultaneously, the IDF is also examining the possibility that this was an attack directed from outside and notes that there was no specific warning regarding the brothers or the attack.

Read the original article on i24news.tv (opens in a new tab)

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from i24News

Everything we scored from i24News