LBC opinion piece, on UK Politics, 12 November 2026
We do not republish articles from LBC. Our findings are below, each quoting the words it is about. Read the full article on the outlet's own site.
Read the original article on lbc.co.uk (opens in a new tab)Katy Walton argues that Child Maintenance Service rules let wealthy parents with low assessable income pay little or nothing, and that this can become economic abuse. The body states the rules with care and qualifies its claims. The headline goes further than the body by saying wealthy men are using the £7 threshold and getting away with abuse, when the body only shows that they can and offers no case.
Opinion piece: read for false claims of fact and for fairness to the people it names, not for its opinions.
Minor
“Wealthy men are using a £7 loophole to pay nothing for their children - and getting away with financial abuse”
How we know
“This is not to suggest that every wealthy father avoids his responsibilities, nor that every maintenance dispute amounts to abuse.”
Walton limits her own argument. She does not judge every wealthy father or every dispute by the cases she describes.
“While mechanisms exist through which certain unearned income, diverted income and assets can be considered, these are neither automatic nor straightforward.”
She tells the reader about the existing routes for challenging an assessment instead of pretending the rules have no remedy at all.
“Its statutory domestic abuse guidance identifies the refusal to pay required child maintenance as a potential form of economic abuse.”
She ties the abuse claim to a named official source and keeps that source's own qualifier, potential.
Spot something we missed? Report this article