The Jerusalem Post, on Gaza, 10 November 2026

8.7out of 10Severe

Tensions flare between Hamas, Fatah less than a month after Palestinian unity talks

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.4 findingsSee them marked on jpost.com

Tensions have flared in recent weeks between Fatah and Hamas, less than a month after the two factions met in Cairo for Palestinian unity talks, amid disagreements over the disruption of humanitarian efforts and the alleged detention of released prisoners, according to official statements.On Monday, Fatah rejected Hamas's claims that the Palestinian Authority was failing Gaza, describing the movement's earlier accusations that the PA was neglecting the territory's humanitarian needs as part of a "disinformation campaign."In response to Hamas's accusations, Fatah said it held "responsible for negligence and failure to intervene to save citizens and alleviate their suffering in the Gaza Strip."

It alleged that Hamas had summoned Palestinian Labor Ministry staff and aid workers in recent weeks and pressured them to sign pledges preventing them from carrying out their duties.

The reported disruptions to humanitarian work come as the region enters the winter season, with temperatures expected to fall to 11°C this week and potentially reach as low as 6°C later in the season.Five Palestinians, including children, have already died after a sand embankment collapsed onto tents in Deir al-Balah following heavy rainfall, according to the Palestinian Civil Defense Agency. Jonathan Veitch, UNICEF's representative for the Palestinian territories, has also warned that tens of thousands of tents have been flooded by the rain."

The movement calls for an end to the summoning and pressuring of employees, and for an end to obstructing the work of government and relief teams," Fatah stated. "It urges that they be enabled to fulfill their duties without threats or interference, to protect citizens, preserve their dignity, and alleviate their suffering."Fatah says Hamas consistently summons its employees for questioningSince Hamas seized control of the Gaza Strip in 2007, Fatah has repeatedly complained that the terrorist group has summoned its employees for questioning.

In February, Fatah claimed that its members Ayman Halawa and Abdelaziz Al-Daour had been summoned by Hamas, condemning the move as divisive.Prof. Kobi Michael, a senior researcher at the Institute for National Security Studies (INSS) and the Misgav Institute, described the friction as "troubling," explaining that Hamas isn't allowing PA representatives to continue cooperating with international aid organizations to help the people of Gaza, to be better prepared for the winter, as an act of retaliation for the arrests of Hamas-affiliated individuals in the West Bank and a fear that Fatah will be able to build a base for itself in the Gaza Strip.Such a base, he said, would weaken Hamas and facilitate its "disarmament and decomposition."

"Hamas has no regret or sorrow regarding its own people, and it is willing to sacrifice its people and to make their life more difficult towards the coming winter to serve its survival and political existence as well as ," Michael said. "This is another form or version of using civilians as human shields, and the world probably will continue blaming Israel."The anger over the reported interference in aid work also comes as Hamas and its officials have made several against Fatah and the Palestinian Authority.

Late last month, Hamas accused the PA security forces of arresting released prisoners, activists, and civilians in a campaign across the West Bank.Palestinian Information Center: PA security forces arrest released Hamas terrorists According to the Palestinian Information Center, , PA security forces arrested the .Describing the arrests as part of a "revolving door" policy by the PA, Hamas claimed the treatment of prisoners "compounded the suffering" of Palestinians.

Read the original article on jpost.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (4)

The Jerusalem Post labels six named Palestinians detained by PA forces, and everyone detained by Israel or the PA, as terrorists in its own voice, when its own report calls them released prisoners and gives no charge or conviction. It lets an Israeli analyst close a passage by casting Gaza's starvation as a Hamas media campaign and blaming civilian suffering on human shields, with nothing set against it. It also tags Gaza's civil defence as Hamas-run beside a death toll and uses loaded words for Hamas and its accusations.

  1. Labels people on one side's word

    Severe

    “released Hamas terrorists Ahmed Noah Harish, Khaled Brahmeh, Muhammad Abu Farha, Muslim Yasar Ishtayeh, Fawzi Bishkar, and Muath Ardaniya”

    Why this matters
    The Post calls six named detained men "released Hamas terrorists" in its own voice.
    The impression it gives
    These six men are established terrorists, so their arrest by PA forces needs no scrutiny.
    The context
    The article's own opening calls them released prisoners and calls their detention alleged. It gives no charge, conviction or act by any of them. Hamas described those arrested as prisoners, activists and civilians.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“the alleged detention of released prisoners”

    Show it in the article

    “which documents the detention of terrorists by both Israel and the PA”

    Why this matters
    The Post describes the Palestinian Information Center's work as documenting "the detention of terrorists", so every Palestinian held by Israel or the PA becomes a terrorist.
    The impression it gives
    Anyone Israel or the PA detains is a terrorist by definition.
    The context
    The article offers no basis for calling all detainees terrorists. Its own opening calls the people at issue released prisoners.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“the alleged detention of released prisoners”

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    According to the Palestinian Information Center, which documents detentions by Israel and the PA, PA security forces arrested released prisoners Ahmed Noah Harish, Khaled Brahmeh, Muhammad Abu Farha, Muslim Yasar Ishtayeh, Fawzi Bishkar and Muath Ardaniya.

  2. Gives a contested claim the last word

    Serious

    “preparation towards another starvation and humanitarian crisis campaign that the international media and community will eat with a great appetite”

    Why this matters
    The Post quotes an INSS analyst casting starvation and the humanitarian crisis in Gaza as a Hamas campaign fed to a gullible media.
    The impression it gives
    Gaza's starvation and humanitarian crisis are a Hamas propaganda exercise, not harm done to Palestinians by Israel.
    The context
    The UN Commission of Inquiry found Israel has committed genocide in Gaza, and the Post's own earlier reporting refers to ongoing Israeli strikes. The article sets none of this against the claim.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Michael, of the Israeli think tank INSS, argued that Hamas is using the crisis for propaganda. A UN Commission of Inquiry has found that Israel has committed genocide in Gaza, and Israeli strikes have continued since the ceasefire.

  3. Political tag on a civilian agency's figures

    Minor

    “Hamas-run”

    Why this matters
    The Post attaches "Hamas-run" to Gaza's civil defence as the source for five deaths, including children.
    The impression it gives
    The death toll from the embankment collapse is a partisan claim to be doubted.
    The context
    The article gives no reason to doubt the figure, and the tag works only as a credibility qualifier on a civilian emergency service.

    Show it in the article

  4. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “inflammatory accusations”

    Why this matters
    The Post calls Hamas's accusations against Fatah and the PA "inflammatory" in its own voice.
    The impression it gives
    Hamas's complaints about arrests are provocation rather than claims to assess.
    The context
    The accusations the article goes on to describe concern arrests that the Palestinian Information Center also documents. The article does not show them to be false.

    Show it in the article

    “the terrorist group”

    Why this matters
    The Post inserts "the terrorist group" into its own paraphrase of a Fatah statement.
    The impression it gives
    Fatah used this label, or the label is a settled neutral fact.
    The context
    The label sits in the Post's narration, outside Fatah's quoted words, and carries a verdict the article does not argue.

    Show it in the article

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The Jerusalem Post

  1. 10 NovUNICEF says Israel blocks Gaza basin repairs, warns of flooding, disease 0.0
  2. 10 NovIsrael's ambassador to US accuses NYT of spreading 'blood libel' over Gaza reporting6.0
  3. 9 NovBoard of Peace calls on Israel to authorize winter supplies aid entry into Gaza following flooding3.0
  4. 9 NovIDF confirms entry of tents, winter supplies into Gaza after Hamas blames Israel for conditions6.0
  5. 9 NovEmirati charity linked to Mohammed Dahlan arranges mass wedding for 250 Gazan couples3.0

Everything we scored from The Jerusalem Post