Arutz Sheva / Israel National News, on Iran, 26 October 2026

9.1out of 10Severe

Report: Hezbollah rebuilding military capabilities with Iranian funding

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.6 findings

has been preparing for a possible new round of fighting with Israel over the past three months, using Iranian financial assistance to rebuild its military capabilities, Reuters reported, citing Lebanese security sources familiar with the group's activities. According to the report, Hezbollah has received tens of millions of dollars from Tehran to strengthen its military infrastructure, in addition to approximately $200 million previously provided by Iran to support families displaced by the fighting in Lebanon.

The terrorist organization has been working to replenish its weapons supplies, particularly explosives, while expanding its ability to manufacture attack drones intended to target Israeli military positions. The preparations follow significant losses suffered by Hezbollah during its confrontations with Israel since 2024, including and the destruction of substantial portions of its weapons stockpiles.

Hezbollah has also been attempting to restore its military command structure following setbacks during battles with Israeli forces. Lebanese security officials told Reuters that the organization experienced serious coordination difficulties in several combat zones, including Bint Jbeil and the strategically important Ali al-Taher ridge. According to the sources, Hezbollah's reliance on small fighting units and restrictions on the use of anti-tank missiles left some of its forces isolated and unable to effectively counter Israeli remotely operated weapons systems.

The IDF confirmed to Reuters that it employs remotely controlled military equipment in southern Lebanon for surveillance and to limit the risks faced by soldiers. Despite its rebuilding efforts, Lebanese security sources indicated that Hezbollah has not yet restored its forces or ammunition reserves to the levels it considers necessary for another major confrontation. Earlier this month, Hezbollah acknowledged ownership of explosives confiscated by Lebanese authorities, stating that the materials were intended for operations against Israel.

A Hezbollah representative and a Lebanese security source subsequently indicated that the explosives were designated for use in attack drones. The organization's preparations come amid concerns that renewed fighting between the US and Iran could also lead to an escalation along Israel's northern border. Hezbollah entered the conflict on March 2 by attacking Israel in support of Iran, prompting a major Israeli military offensive. and displaced approximately one-quarter of the country's population, according to the Reuters report.

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

The article says Hezbollah entered the conflict on March 2 "by attacking Israel in support of Iran" but never says that US-Israeli strikes on Iran in February started the wider war. Without this, a reader believes Hezbollah and Iran opened hostilities.

How we know

Hostilities decreased during the summer following an interim agreement between Washington and Tehran that included a ceasefire in Lebanon. Although that agreement subsequently collapsed, large-scale fighting between Israel and Hezbollah has not resumed. Meanwhile, Hezbollah continues to face growing domestic pressure in Lebanon to surrender its weapons. Responding to Reuters , Hezbollah maintained that the continued Israeli military presence in Lebanese territory justified armed resistance.

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

The article mentions the Israeli presence in Lebanon only as Hezbollah's justification. Reuters reports it as fact: Israeli forces control villages in southern Lebanon and hold a security zone where civilians have been ordered to evacuate.

How we know

The organization also disputed claims that its military command systems had collapsed. However, Hezbollah indicated that it was seeking to avoid providing Israel with grounds for another escalation, particularly because of concerns that renewed fighting could force additional residents of its Shiite support base to flee their homes. The US State Department said Washington would continue using sanctions and other economic measures against Hezbollah's financial networks.

The US Treasury Department also asserted that Iran was facing increasing difficulties funding its allies and transferring money abroad. The IDF declined to address Hezbollah's reported preparations, while Iran's mission to the UN in Geneva did not immediately respond to Reuters ' inquiries.

Read the original article on israelnationalnews.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (6)

Arutz Sheva retells a Reuters report on Hezbollah rearming. In its own voice it writes the killing of thousands of Hezbollah members as "elimination" of "terrorists", and it turns the Israeli offensive that killed more than 4,000 people in Lebanon into deaths that "the fighting resulted in". It also says Hezbollah attacked "in support of Iran" without saying that US and Israeli strikes on Iran came first.

  1. Writes the death out

    Severe

    “the elimination of thousands of terrorists and senior commanders”

    Why this matters
    The outlet uses "elimination" in its own voice for the killing of thousands of people.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes in a clean, technical removal rather than thousands of people killed by Israeli occupation forces.
    The context
    These people were killed. The Reuters report carried by the Times of Israel says thousands of Hezbollah members and many of its leaders were "killed". The article never uses any form of the word kill.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    The preparations follow heavy losses since 2024, when Israeli forces killed thousands of Hezbollah members and many of its leaders and destroyed much of its arsenal.

  2. Labels people on one side's word

    Serious

    “thousands of terrorists”

    Why this matters
    The outlet calls the thousands of dead "terrorists" in its own voice, with no source and no detail about who they were.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes every one of the thousands killed was a terrorist, as an established fact, and that their deaths need no further account.
    The context
    The article offers nothing about the identity of the dead. The label is Israel's designation, written as the outlet's own verdict on people who were killed.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

  3. Hides who did it

    Serious

    “The fighting resulted in more than 4,000 deaths in Lebanon”

    Why this matters
    The outlet makes "the fighting" the subject and gives a toll of "deaths", which removes both the actor and the act of killing.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes more than 4,000 people in Lebanon died in fighting with no clear cause or author.
    The context
    Reuters, as carried by the Times of Israel, says an Israeli offensive killed more than 4,000 people and uprooted a quarter of Lebanon's population. The previous sentence even names "a major Israeli military offensive", but this sentence detaches the dead from it.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    The Israeli offensive killed more than 4,000 people in Lebanon and displaced about a quarter of the country's population, according to Reuters.

  4. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “The Hezbollah terrorist organization”

    Why this matters
    The outlet opens its report by calling Hezbollah a "terrorist organization" in its own narration, not as anyone's designation.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes the label as a neutral description, not as the position of particular governments.
    The context
    The Reuters material the article relies on is about Hezbollah's rearmament and funding. The label is a verdict the article does not attribute to anyone.

    Show it in the article

  5. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    The article says Hezbollah entered the conflict on March 2 "by attacking Israel in support of Iran" but never says that US-Israeli strikes on Iran in February started the wider war. Without this, a reader believes Hezbollah and Iran opened hostilities.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

  6. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    The article mentions the Israeli presence in Lebanon only as Hezbollah's justification. Reuters reports it as fact: Israeli forces control villages in southern Lebanon and hold a security zone where civilians have been ordered to evacuate.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Arutz Sheva / Israel National News

  1. 26 OctSaudi Arabia, Turkey and Pakistan hold high-level talks with Iran0.0
  2. 26 OctKatz: Israel never planned pre-election strike on Iran7.3
  3. 26 OctTrump on Iran: I’m going to make a great deal3.0
  4. 25 OctCan military action topple Iran's regime? Netanyahu's inner circle has doubts3.0
  5. 25 OctReport: Iran threatens to target senior American officials3.0

Everything we scored from Arutz Sheva / Israel National News