Metro, on UK Politics, 5 November 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

The 3 types of 'normalised' porn being banned from tomorrow

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.3 findings

There’s some big changes happening in the porn world (Picture: Getty Images/iStockphoto) From tomorrow, Brits will no longer be able to watch porn containing ‘horrific material’. Any porn featuring strangulation or suffocation will be banned from November 6, in the fight against the normalisation of violence against women and girls. In addition, sex between people who are related or pretending to be incestuous, or where somebody is pretending to be a child under 16, will also be made illegal.

Alex Davies-Jones, Minister for Victims and Violence Against Women and Girls, has called this pornographic material an ‘epidemic’ of ‘horrific behaviour’. She believes these new laws, which are part of the Crime and Policing Bill, will ‘stop cowardly perpetrators from hiding behind a screen and thinking that means they’re able to facilitate abuse with impunity’. Here’s everything you need to know… Strangulation and suffocation

The act, commonly known as ‘choking’ . More than two in five sexually active under-18s in the UK have either been strangled or strangled someone during sex, according to a study by the Institute for Addressing Strangulation (Ifas), with more than half of under 35s experiencing it, too. Strangulation in porn has been widely normalised (Picture: Getty Images) Vicky Young, Head of Stop It Now for child protection charity Lucy Faithfull Foundation told Metro: ‘People viewing this extreme pornography – especially young people who may be exposed to it online – might think that strangulation and other violent behaviours are normal in sexual relationships, without understanding the risks.’

Indeed, 36% said they felt scared during the experience and 21% suffered dangerous physical symptoms, including dizziness and even loss of consciousness. ‘This isn’t about criminalising harmless sexual preferences,’ Alex Davies-Jones told Metro. ‘But porn can shape what people think a healthy relationship looks like, especially young people. ‘Content that normalises, or even glorifies, violence against women is dangerous and can blur the line with what is acceptable in real life.’

From tomorrow, if you possess or publish porn depicting strangulation or suffocation, you could be imprisoned for up to two years. New porn laws at a glance When do they come into effect? November 6, 2026 What is banned? Depictions of strangulation and suffocation, punishable by up to two years imprisonment for possession or publication of this porn. Impersonating a child in porn under the age of 16, punishable by up to three years in prison.

Depictions of incest, including between step-family, punishable by two years’ imprisonment for possession, or five years for publication. Impersonating a child The ban of this particular type of porn has been making headlines for years. Kelly, Kevin Spacey, Larry Nassar. Bonnie Blue was heavily criticised for using the term ‘barely legal’ to market her sex work, while ‘teen’ is among the most popular search terms on Pornhub.

Emily Atack recently made headlines after backing a petition from teens to ban the depiction of school uniforms in porn, to stop them being sexualised. Porn featuring the depiction of those under 16 will also be illegal (Picture: Getty Images/iStockphoto) Alex Davies-Jones praised the petition, telling Metro: ‘Pornography must never normalise or glorify the sexual abuse of children. That’s why we’re changing the law so possessing or sharing pornography which depicts an adult pretending to be a child under 16 will be an imprisonable offence.’

However, students worried that without school uniforms in porn being banned specifically, there could be a grey area for porn publishers to claim they were depicting 16 to 18-year-olds instead. Posessing or publishing porn depicting under 16s will be punishable by up to three years in prison. ‘We’re pleased to see this ban because it will make children safer,’ Vicky Young added. ‘In addition, thousands of people who contact our Stop It Now helpline tell us that extreme pornography has played a role in their pathway to viewing illegal sexual images of children. ‘Over time, people become desensitised and seek more extreme content in a process of escalation.

It’s a common pathway for people who have viewed illegal images, and this ban could help prevent that.’ Depictions of incest ‘The possession of this horrific material does lead to real world harm, and there are links to child sexual abuse as a result of this,’ Alex added. The minister previously told Metro she met with a woman whose father was looking at depictions of incest in porn, then ‘creating elaborate stories of abusing her, and posting them online’.

Any depiction of incest will be illegal (Picture: Getty Images) Now, the creation and possession of porn showing incest, whether those appearing are actually related or not, will be banned. It will be punishable with two years’ imprisonment for possession or five years for publication of the porn. Previously, it was only an offence if incest actually took place. Since this measure was announced in February, it’s been expanded to include portrayals of step-family incest porn.

In a debate in the House of Lords as part of the bill’s report stage, Baroness Bertin said she was ‘mystified’ why step-incest hadn’t already been included, adding: ‘In 2024, 4.1 billion videos viewed on Pornhub featured incest-related scenarios.’ Do you have a story you’d like to share? Get in touch by emailing MetroLifestyleTeam@metro.co.uk

Read the original article on metro.co.uk (opens in a new tab)
What we found (3)

Metro explains the new offences for possessing or publishing pornography showing strangulation, incest or adults pretending to be children, and attributes the minister's and the charity's views clearly. In a few places it takes the minister's word 'epidemic' as its own and states an under-40 claim its cited study does not support. It also lists named men under a heading about child impersonation with nothing that connects them to it.

  1. Uses a loaded word

    Minor

    “Strangulation has been an epidemic in porn.”

    Why this matters
    Metro states in its own voice that strangulation is an "epidemic" in porn, taking up the minister's word as its own verdict.
    The impression it gives
    That an independent measure shows strangulation content has spread at epidemic scale, rather than that this is how the minister describes it.
    The context
    The word comes from the minister, whom Metro quotes earlier calling the material an 'epidemic'. The article gives no figure for how much porn contains strangulation.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“has called this pornographic material an ‘epidemic’ of ‘horrific behaviour’”

    Show it in the article

  2. States one side's claim as fact

    Minor

    “has become internalised by those under 40 as a normal practice”

    Why this matters
    Metro asserts without attribution that everyone under 40 has come to see choking as normal.
    The impression it gives
    That there is evidence about a whole age group up to 40 treating choking as normal.
    The context
    The only study Metro cites gives figures for under-18s and under-35s and measures experience of strangulation, not whether people think it is normal. Nothing in the article supports the under-40 claim.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“with more than half of under 35s experiencing it, too”

    Show it in the article

  3. Guilt by association

    Minor

    “We’ve seen high profile sexual misconduct investigations into the likes of Jeffrey Epstein, R.”

    Why this matters
    Under the heading about adults impersonating children, Metro lists named men who faced sexual misconduct investigations. It continues the list into the next sentence with Kevin Spacey and Larry Nassar.
    The impression it gives
    That each named man is connected to child sexual abuse or to porn depicting children, the subject of the section.
    The context
    The article gives nothing that ties these individuals, including Kevin Spacey, to child impersonation porn or to the new offence. It says only that they faced investigations, without any outcomes, and the list has no link to the law being reported.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“The ban of this particular type of porn has been making headlines for years”

    Show it in the article

What it gets right

  • “Alex Davies-Jones, Minister for Victims and Violence Against Women and Girls, has called this pornographic material an ‘epidemic’ of ‘horrific behaviour’.”

    It names the minister and attributes the charged language to her rather than to Metro.

  • “according to a study by the Institute for Addressing Strangulation (Ifas)”

    It names the source of the headline statistic on young people's experience of strangulation.

  • “punishable by two years’ imprisonment for possession, or five years for publication”

    It gives readers the specific penalties for each offence, not a vague reference to a ban.

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Metro

  1. 4 NovUK's longest running road project will now pass 100 years after further delay0.0
  2. 4 NovDanny Tommo faces trial next year over Dover migrant centre claims0.0
  3. 2 NovFull details of dramatic rule changes for migrants settling in UK revealed0.0
  4. 2 NovLocals fight to stop London's 'version of Trump Tower' in leafy area0.0
  5. 2 NovBBC News accidentally airs ‘erections’ on live TV in jaw-dropping blunder0.0

Everything we scored from Metro