The Independent, on Climate, 10 November 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

Heat-trapping carbon pollution drops, but scientists cite the Iran war

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.1 finding

Become an Independent member to bookmark this article Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Membership today. Join today Already a member? Log in Global carbon pollution dropped this year ever so slightly, but it's more because of oil shocks reverberating from the Iran war than anything the world has done to fight climate change, scientists said in a new study. In 2026, the world emitted 42.2 billion tons (38.2 billion metric tons) of heat-trapping carbon dioxide from the burning of fossil fuels such as coal, oil and gas.

It’s a 0.4% decrease from last year, according to the scientists of the Global Carbon Project, which publishes its estimates in the journal Earth System Science Data Discussions. “It’s downwards which sounds good, but this is largely driven by the war in Iran, what’s happened in the Strait of Hormuz ,” said study co-author Glen Peters, a scientist at the CICERO Center for International Climate Research in Norway . “So in a way, a little bit of good news, but for the wrong reasons.”

The war in Iran has effectively closed the Strait of Hormuz, a vital shipping artery for petroleum products, pushing up global prices of gasoline and oil. They found oil emissions dropped nearly 2% and natural gas fell 0.3%, while coal was up 0.6%. The international team of more than 140 scientists use data from around the world to calculate the yearly emissions figure, with estimates for the last few months of the year, and then present them at the U.N. climate negotiations in Antalya, Turkey.

Peters said they are certain that this was related to the war-triggered energy shocks because of both the timing and type of fuel emission drops. If the overall carbon dioxide emission drop were due solely to a rise in renewables and a systemic drop in fossil fuel use, oil emissions “would slowly come up to a peak and then slowly decline afterward, whereas what we see this year is oil emissions are going up and then suddenly BANG, down 2%,” Peters said.

Previous carbon pollution drops This is the third time global carbon pollution dropped in the 21st century. The other two times were because of the global recession in 2009 and the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. In those past two crises, people hoped the recovery from the shocks would emphasize clean energy, Peters said, "but at the end of the day, we seem to go back to where we were before.” Outside experts greeted the figures with a mix of hope and skepticism that it will last.

Niklas Höhne, co-founder of Germany’s NewClimate Institute, said “permanent shifts are happening” especially with skyrocketing switches to electric cars and trucks, especially in Asia. So he thinks the global peak of carbon emissions is near or here. But Malte Mienshausen, a climate science and policy expert at the University of Melbourne in Australia, said oil producing nations and companies not affected by the blockage of the Strait of Hormuz reaped “tremendous windfall gains,” and it boosts their efforts to look for oil outside the Middle East.

That, he said, will dampen any short-term effects of reduced carbon emissions from the war. More than 1,000 tons per second of pollution The 42 billion tons of carbon dioxide emitted this year comes to about 1,335 tons (1,211 metric tons) of the transparent, heat-trapping gas going into the air every second. “We shouldn’t lose sight of the bigger picture. The world is still pumping more than a thousand (metric tons) of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere every second," Mohamed Adow, director of the environmental group Power Shift Africa, said in an email.

“It’s very abstract to think about the magnitude of stuff we throw in the atmosphere every year, but it’s a ginormous number,” Peters said. “If it was black and not transparent, the sky would be dark.” And even though the amount of heat-trapping gases from fossil fuels dropped slightly, overall global carbon dioxide emissions went up 1%. That's because of land use changes, such as deforestation and human-caused peat fires, that increased faster than fossil fuel burning decreased, the study said.

China 's emissions drop raises eyebrows and hope Most of the world's biggest carbon polluting nations — China, the United States, Europe, Japan — showed about a 1% drop in emissions this year, but Peters attributed it to the oil shock. India's fossil fuel pollution went up 4.4% this year, the study found. China's emission drop raised eyebrows and hope for some experts. Experts have been waiting for China's ever-growing emissions to start dropping.

“China is giving us real reasons to be optimistic that its emissions may have peaked," Adow said. “It’s building the world’s first major electrostate, investing at extraordinary speed and scale in solar power, wind energy, electric vehicles and the infrastructure to support them. This isn’t a temporary response to an oil crisis. It’s a fundamental transformation of China’s economy that is steadily reducing its dependence on fossil fuels.”

University of Michigan environment dean Jonathan Overpeck said, “We're not phasing out fossil fuels fast enough, but some progress is better than no progress.” ___ The Associated Press’ climate and environmental coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP’s standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at AP.org.

Read the original article on independent.co.uk (opens in a new tab)
What we found (1)

The Independent runs an AP report on the Global Carbon Project's estimate that fossil fuel carbon dioxide emissions fell 0.4% in 2026, which the scientists quoted put down more to the Iran war oil shock than to climate action. The body attributes the cause to the scientists, gives the 1% rise in overall emissions from land use, and states that carbon dioxide traps heat as fact. The headline goes a step too far: co-author Glen Peters says the drop is 'largely driven' by the war, but the headline says the scientists cite the war 'rather than energy progress', leaving out the clean energy contribution that other coverage of the study reports.

  1. Headline goes beyond the article

    Minor

    “rather than energy progress”

    Why this matters
    The words "rather than energy progress" set the Iran war against clean energy as an either-or cause of the emissions drop.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes it that the scientists found energy progress played no part in this year's fall.
    The context
    The body is comparative. It says the drop is "more because of" the oil shocks, and the study's co-author says it is "largely driven" by the war. Other coverage of the same study reports that the decline was partly due to the war and partly due to the expansion of clean energy, with solar, wind and electric vehicles meeting about two thirds of new demand.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

What it gets right

  • “overall global carbon dioxide emissions went up 1%”

    The article does not let the 0.4% fall in fossil fuel emissions stand alone. It tells the reader that total emissions still rose, so the headline figure does not mislead about the overall trend.

  • “land use changes, such as deforestation and human-caused peat fires”

    It names the concrete human causes behind the rise in overall emissions instead of leaving them abstract.

  • “heat-trapping carbon dioxide from the burning of fossil fuels such as coal, oil and gas”

    It states in its own voice that carbon dioxide traps heat and names fossil fuel burning as its source, with no hedge on the basic science.

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The Independent

  1. 10 NovBrazil to present plan for moving economies toward renewable energies at UN climate talks0.0
  2. 9 NovUK attends Cop31 summit after record heatwaves and drought0.0
  3. 9 NovHow close are we to a long-term breach of critical 1.5C warming limit as Cop31 begins?0.0
  4. 9 NovUK weather extremes show why climate action and Cop31 are vital, minister says0.0
  5. 9 NovAs wars and Trump sideline climate action, COP has never mattered more0.0

Everything we scored from The Independent