The Scotsman, on Climate, 27 October 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

Chancellor warned not to axe North Sea energy project to fund defence in carbon capture 'betrayal'

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.3 findings

Chancellor John Healey has been warned not to hold back Aberdeen’s oil and gas sector by ensuring extra defence spending does not come at the expense of a key energy project. It is widely anticipated that Mr Healey, who will deliver his first Budget on Wednesday, will signal a ramping up of spending on defence. Mr Healey quit Sir Keir Starmer’s government as defence secretary in protest at a lack of funding being pledged on Britain’s military.

Energy projects earmarked by former net zero secretary Ed Miliband are expected to be in the firing line to make way for the additional defence spending. Mr Miliband used a visit to Aberdeenshire last year to pledge £200 million for the Acorn carbon capture and storage project. A final investment decision is expected to be made in the UK government’s spending review next year - but cuts to the energy security and net zero budget in the Budget would lay the path for funding for the project to be scrapped.

UK ministers committed £9.4 billion at last year’s spending review to support the carbon capture industry up to 2030, with £21.7 billion pledged over the next 25 years. But speculation has mounted that carbon capture projects could be in line for the axe. David Whitehouse, chief executive of , told The Scotsman investment in carbon capture should be coming forward from Westminster. “It is the key time for our carbon storage future,” he said.

Left out here: One side gets the space

Every voice in the article, from OEUK to the SNP, the Conservatives and the minister, backs carbon capture funding. The article never mentions the campaign, reported the same day, calling the spending exorbitant and larger than the US, EU, Norway and Japan combined. A reader comes away thinking the only question is whether Westminster will pay, not whether the spending is worth it.

How we know

“I think the opportunities for Scotland are significant. “Acorn is important, but it's not just Acorn. We see across the North Sea huge opportunities to store carbon dioxide, not just from the UK and Scotland but also from Europe. “I’ve been delighted to see the progress that we're now seeing on the first two track 1 projects. But I do think it is going to be a critical decision at the spending review next year, seeing support coming through for Acorn and the projects that sit beyond that.

“That will be an important message for the industrial sector in Scotland but also for our future in carbon storage.I think critical decisions will lie ahead of us next year.” SNP MP Seamus Logan said: "The Westminster government has dithered and delayed on North East carbon capture for too long and quite frankly this is a complete betrayal of the sector. "Energy security is national security so let's not pretend this is about defence spending - this is about Westminster hammering Scottish industry to patch holes in the Treasury finances just as they always have done.”

Scottish Conservative energy spokesperson, Liam Kerr, said: “Both of Scotland’s governments have repeatedly short-changed the North East when it comes to investing in carbon capture and storage. “Now there are real fears that the UK Labour government is preparing to follow the SNP’s lead and fail to fully support this technology in the Budget. “The people of the North East will be eagerly awaiting to see if Labour’s Budget decides investing in these facilities is no longer a political priority for them and if they will ignore the calls from the industry.”

UK reindustrialisation minister Blair McDougall said: “Both hydrogen and carbon capture undersea storage are an essential part, not just of the reindustrialisation story, but of the net zero story as well. “Decisions on all of these projects will be a matter for the Budget, but we are absolutely committed to the role that hydrogen can play in the UK economy.”

Read the original article on scotsman.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (3)

The Scotsman reports warnings against cutting carbon capture funding in the Budget, quoting only backers of the technology. It introduces Offshore Energies UK as a plain industry body without saying it speaks for North Sea oil and gas companies. In its own voice it calls the Acorn project crucial, although the same day campaigners called the spending wasteful.

  1. Hides who the source is

    Minor

    “industry body Offshore Energies UK (OEUK)”

    Why this matters
    The words "industry body" introduce OEUK as a neutral voice for industry, with nothing on whose interests it represents or what it campaigns for.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes David Whitehouse's call for Westminster money for carbon capture as the view of a neutral expert group.
    The context
    Offshore Energies UK is the trade association for North Sea oil and gas companies, formerly Oil & Gas UK, and it runs the Back the North Sea campaign. Its members stand to benefit from public money for offshore carbon storage. The article never says so.

    How we know

    • Checked against the whole articleIt never uses the words “trade association” and “campaign”.

    Show it in the article

  2. States one side's claim as fact

    Minor

    “The project is crucial for Scotland’s clean energy ambitions.”

    Why this matters
    The Scotsman says in its own voice, with no attribution, that the Acorn carbon capture project is "crucial".
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes it as settled that Acorn is essential to Scotland's clean energy plans and that cutting it would harm climate goals.
    The context
    Carbon capture spending is contested. On the same day, campaigners led by Chris Packham urged the chancellor to cut the £24bn carbon capture plans in favour of schemes that reliably cut emissions. The article does not attribute the claim or mention that it is disputed.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

  3. One side gets the space

    Minor

    What is missing

    Every voice in the article, from OEUK to the SNP, the Conservatives and the minister, backs carbon capture funding. The article never mentions the campaign, reported the same day, calling the spending exorbitant and larger than the US, EU, Norway and Japan combined. A reader comes away thinking the only question is whether Westminster will pay, not whether the spending is worth it.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The Scotsman

  1. 27 OctScotland weather: Search for missing person at Largs halted amid severe weather warnings across Scotland3.0
  2. 26 OctTribute to man killed by falling tree in Dumfries and Galloway during Storm Boelo6.0
  3. 26 OctSNP ministers were warned oil and gas slump driving renewables investment out of Scotland3.0
  4. 25 OctTens of thousands without power and one man dead after Storm Boelo batters Scotland6.0
  5. 25 OctLargs restaurant owner 'truly devastated' after Storm Boelo flooding destroys kitchen0.0

Everything we scored from The Scotsman