City AM, by Maurício Alencar, on UK Politics, 9 November 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

Tories set out £36bn welfare cuts in push for savings 

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.2 findings

The Conservatives have published a plan to cut the welfare bill by more than £36bn a year as the party pledged to find spending reductions in order to support the public finances. The opposition party has published a 50-page document detailing its welfare savings plans, expanding on previous commitments that would see disability spending and other benefits offered to families radically cut back. Shadow work and pension secretary Helen Whately said the benefits bill was “out of control” as she said “hard graft” by Tory researchers showed the party was prepared to get the welfare bill down.

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

City AM does not report that Helen Whately indicated the Tories would not spend more on employment support. Without it, a reader may take Badenoch's talk of looking at what people can do to mean the plan includes added help into work.

How we know

A large chunk of the savings would come from reforming disability and sickness benefits, which includes ending claims for “mild mental health conditions”. Welfare cuts for migrants and people with ‘mild’ disabilities The Conservatives’ document said it forecast cuts to spending from not offering the “standard rates of personal independence payments for milder mental health issues and neurodiversity conditions such as anxiety, depression and ADHD”.

Reforms on back pain, arthritis and whiplash assessments, plus changes to how pensioners claim benefits, could add additional savings. In addition to the near-£14bn savings on sickness and disability benefits , about £9.5bn would be cut by ending access to the welfare state for foreign nationals excluding settled EU citizens plus billions more from housing benefit reforms and ending access for foreign nationals. The Tories would also re-instate the two-child benefit cap, which was scrapped by Rachel Reeves in 2025 following pressure from Labour backbenchers.

Changes to Motability, housing benefits and reducing fraud and error would add welfare savings up to £36bn. Kemi Badenoch said the party’s new system would better reflect the contribution millions of people make to the economy. In a speech on Tuesday, she is expected to point out that “double amputees run marathons” and “people with autism run some of the biggest tech companies in the world”. “If you tell a young person that their ADHD means they are defective and will never amount to anything, that mindset is likely to be more destructive to their future than the condition itself.

That is what our welfare system is currently doing,” she will also say. “” Quangocracy clampdown The party is bringing forward further details on welfare savings just as the government is set to hear from Alan Milburn and Sir Stephen Timms on full reviews of the benefits system for young people out of work and disabled people.

The Milburn review is expected to recommend larger investment in employment, with changes to benefits also set to feature. Andy Burnham’s spokesman has said a white paper on welfare reform will be published early next year. The Labour government has not committed to bring the welfare bill down by 2030. It has also been suggested that his flagship 10-year plan speech could only come next year, rather than by the end of 2026. The 10-year plan is facing heavy scrutiny from City analysts as Burnham pushes to expand his “public control” agenda.

The speech could include pledges to strip down arms-length bodies and transfer powers across transport and other areas of the state to ministers and mayors, according to the Telegraph. A report by the right-leaning think tank Policy Exchange has called on ministers to seize control of more than a dozen quangos across the Department for Education (DfE) and the Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) in order to limit the scope of bureaucracy and “unnecessary” extensions of the state over businesses and people’s lives.

The report’s authors argued that spending on quangos in either department amounts to about £3bn a year while power should be returned to “politicians the public can hold to account”. Burnham is reviewing the power and scope of quangos ahead of drafting his 10-year plan, according to reports. Alex Burghart, the deputy leader of the Conservatives, said that the Tories would consider proposals in the report as it forms policies before the next election.

Read the original article on cityam.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (2)

City AM reports the Conservatives' £36bn welfare cuts plan accurately in outline and ties the savings figures to the party's plan and document. It lets Badenoch's speech close the welfare section with no response from disabled people, charities or Labour, and leaves out Helen Whately's indication that the Tories would not spend more on employment support. These are minor gaps, and nothing in the piece seriously misleads.

  1. One side gets the space

    Minor

    “Conservatives believe in a system that looks at people through the lens of what they can do, not what they cannot.”

    Why this matters
    City AM gives four sentences to Badenoch's speech and ends the welfare section on her line. No voice from those affected or from any opponent follows.
    The impression it gives
    A reader is left with the party's account of the cuts as the only view of what they mean for disabled and sick claimants.
    The context
    The article quotes no disabled person, no disability charity or campaigner and no Labour response to the plan, although the cuts fall on people with anxiety, depression, ADHD and other conditions named in S5.

    How we know

    • Checked against the whole articleIt never uses the words “charity” and “campaigners”.
    • Elsewhere in the article“anxiety, depression and ADHD”

    Show it in the article

  2. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    City AM does not report that Helen Whately indicated the Tories would not spend more on employment support. Without it, a reader may take Badenoch's talk of looking at what people can do to mean the plan includes added help into work.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

What it gets right

  • “disability spending and other benefits offered to families radically cut back”

    City AM calls the plan what it is: a radical cut to disability and family benefits, not just reform.

  • “the right-leaning think tank Policy Exchange”

    City AM tells the reader the political leaning of the think tank whose proposals the Tories say they will consider.

  • “said the benefits bill was “out of control””

    City AM attributes the claim that the bill is out of control to Whately rather than stating it as its own view.

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from City AM

  1. 9 NovHMRC ‘flying blind’ on over 1.2m tax demands after failing to track error rates 0.0
  2. 9 NovAre councils responsible for the e-bike wild west in the city?0.0
  3. 9 NovBurnham’s 10-year plan is already running out of time0.0
  4. 9 NovCity chairman: Burnham is right to pursue closer ties with the EU0.0
  5. 8 NovNandy flags downsides of closer EU relations0.0

Everything we scored from City AM