← the leaderboard

Anadolu Agency (English) · Iran · 30 Aug 2026

Passive voice hides who attacked, the headline editorialises, and the legal stakes go unmentioned.

7.3
/ 10 · article score
scored on 3 of 11 measures · thin coverage

File a complaint

This article can be challenged with Anadolu Agency (English)'s editorial-standards team.

  • Amend the body of the article to name the agent responsible for the opening strikes described in the phrase 'the war began with strikes on Iran in late February,' applying the same standard of direct attribution already used when describing Iran's actions, or add an explicit editorial note explaining why the agent cannot be confirmed.
  • Amend the headline to reflect the contested or unverified nature of Iran's claim, for example: 'Iran says Hormuz transit deal with Oman depends on US commitments, a claim Washington has not confirmed.' The amended headline should not present one party's conditional assertion as the neutral framing of the story.
Be the first to complain

Every highlight is a quote the model flagged. Tap one — or a metric below — to see what it measures and why it scored the way it did.

Aggressor framingHeadline analysis

Iran says Hormuz transit understanding with Oman contingent on US fulfilling commitments

Iran has reached an understanding with Oman on transit arrangements through the Strait of Hormuz but its implementation is contingent on the US fulfilling its commitments, a senior Iranian diplomat said on Saturday. "This understanding will not automatically enter the implementation stage,” Deputy Foreign Minister for Legal and International Affairs Kazem Gharibabadi said, according to Tasnim news agency. “Implementing this understanding requires the other side, particularly the US, to fulfill its commitments. Whenever these commitments are implemented, Iran will also take its measures,” he said. Gharibabadi said Iran was in no hurry to reopen the strait and would continue its “defensive measures” and efforts to “counter threats.” “These measures are not new, and if Washington is interested in returning to the path of diplomacy, it must accept responsibility for its past actions,” he added. He said the necessary arrangements regarding the strait had been made with the Omani government, but responsibility for meeting the requirements rested with the other side. “Whenever these commitments are fulfilled, Iran will take the necessary action. The Strait of Hormuz remains closed, and if any vessel passes through this route, it will be with the coordination and authorization of the Islamic Republic of Iran,” he said. Gharibabadi added that Iran’s armed forces maintain “full oversight” of movements in the strait, rejecting claims that vessels were passing through without coordination with Tehran. He said Iran’s meetings and contacts with Qatar and Pakistan were held in light of the two countries’ roles as mediators in the talks. “Qatar and Pakistan sought to examine whether it was possible to resume implementation of the commitments under the Islamabad understanding,” he said. Tensions between Tehran and Washington have remained high since the war began with strikes on Iran in late February. Iran retaliated by targeting US military positions and assets in Arab countries aligned with Washington. With Pakistani and Qatari mediation, they reached a ceasefire in April and later signed a memorandum of understanding in Islamabad in June to negotiate a lasting peace agreement. Before the war, there was free passage through the strait, a critical export route for Gulf oil and gas, but Iran insists on retaining control and charging fees, something the US rejects. Escalatory strikes between the US and Iran in July caused the US to reimpose a naval blockade of Iranian ports, and revoke a waiver that allowed Iran to export oil, with the conflict now appearing to have reached a stalemate.

Read the original article ↗