Daily Express, on Iran, 15 October 2026

6.0out of 10Serious

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.3 findings

Donald Trump drawing up plans to drop 'mother of all bombs' on Iran Donald Trump is under pressure to end the war. Share Article Share Article Facebook X LinkedIn Reddit Bluesky Email Copy Link Link copied Bookmark Add us as preferred source Comments By Rebecca Perring , Kris Boratyn , Audience Writer 09:39, Thu, Oct 15, 2026 Updated: 12:39, Thu, Oct 15, 2026 Donald Trump appears to need assistance from aide to sit down Donald Trump's US military is understood to be drawing up plans that could see them use the “mother of all bombs” to target Iranian energy infrastructure and nuclear sites, it is reported.

The US president could give the order to resume combat operations either before or after the midterm elections. The plans reportedly include the possible use of the GBU-43/B Massive Ordnance Air Blast Bomb, known as the MOAB. It is the largest non-nuclear bomb in the US arsenal and its use in Iran would mark a major escalation in the conflict. and has threatened further strikes against the country.

However, there are reportedly questions within the US military over whether the huge bomb would be effective against some of Iran's heavily protected nuclear facilities. Article continues below ADVERTISEMENT CNN reports that new strike plans have been drawn up by the US military as officials continue to present Trump with different options for potential attacks. One source told the outlet that Trump had ordered additional strike packages to be developed against Iranian targets, including "a lot of energy infrastructure" and the potential use of the MOAB.

Another source said plans for attacks on Iranian nuclear sites, including Pickaxe Mountain, also specifically included the weapon. The US and Israel believe components of Iran's nuclear programme have been stored at the site. However, the MOAB may not be capable of reaching facilities buried deep underground. The GPS-guided bomb can devastate a huge area on the surface, but it was not designed as a deep-penetration weapon. One source familiar with military planning told CNN: "The MOAB is a massive information operation type weapon that is great for huge area clearance but not much else.

It is definitely not designed as a deep penetration warhead." Article continues below ADVERTISEMENT Its enormous blast area could also raise concerns about civilian casualties if it were used against infrastructure close to populated areas. The weapon could instead potentially be used for its psychological impact. Article continues below ADVERTISEMENT NATO member scrambles fighter jets as WW3 fears with Russia explode WW3 fears explode as Russians secretly fear 'insane' Putin will 'start nuclear war' The MOAB was developed during the Iraq War and explodes before reaching the ground (Image: Getty) The US president could give the order to resume combat operations either before or after the midterm elections (Image: AP Photo/Alex Brandon) Get the latest news from around the world and more I would like to receive emails from the Daily Express featuring our latest products, services, offers, and promotions from across the Reach Plc family .

Subscribe Invalid email You agree you are 18 or over. We use your sign-up to provide content in ways you've consented to and to improve our understanding of you. This may include adverts from us and third parties based on our knowledge of you. You can unsubscribe at any time. More Info . The MOAB was developed during the Iraq War and explodes before reaching the ground, sending a powerful blast out across a large area. Trump became the first US president to use the weapon in combat during his first term.

In 2017, it was dropped on an ISIS tunnel complex in Afghanistan. Afghan officials said 36 ISIS fighters were killed, while US and Afghan officials said no civilians were hurt. President Trump faces pressure to find a way out of the conflict with Iran (Image: Getty) The latest plans come as Trump faces pressure to find a way out of the conflict with Iran. He has indicated that he does not want to send US ground troops into the country and has recently said he would hold off on further strikes before the midterm elections.

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

The article never says the war began with US-Israeli attacks in February. It speaks of Trump facing pressure to 'find a way out of the conflict' and of resuming combat operations. Without this fact a reader can take the US as a party drawn into a war rather than the side that started it.

How we know

However, officials reportedly remain unsure whether that position could change. Asked about the reported plans, a White House official told CNN that the administration does not comment on sensitive military plans that may or may not exist. The official added: "" Donald Trump Military Iran Share Article Share Article Facebook X LinkedIn Reddit Bluesky Email Copy Link Link copied Bookmark Add us as preferred source Comments

Read the original article on express.co.uk (opens in a new tab)
What we found (3)

The Express turns a CNN report into a flat statement of fact in its headline, although the body attributes it and the White House would not confirm it. It lets Trump's 'Iran can never have a nuclear weapon' line frame the story and close it, and never tells the reader that the IAEA found no credible indication of a coordinated weapons programme or that Iran says it is not seeking one. It also never says the war began with US-Israeli attacks.

  1. Gives a contested claim the last word

    Serious

    “President Trump keeps all options on the table to ensure that Iran can never have a nuclear weapon.”

    Why this matters
    The Express ends the article on the White House justifying the strike plans as stopping Iran getting a nuclear weapon. Nothing is set against it.
    The impression it gives
    A reader leaves believing Iran is pursuing a nuclear weapon and that the bombing plans answer that threat.
    The context
    Other coverage of the same report states that the IAEA said it had no credible indication of a coordinated weapons programme. It also states that Iran says it does not want and is not seeking nuclear weapons. The article mentions neither.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    “Trump has repeatedly insisted that Iran must never be allowed to obtain a nuclear weapon”

    Why this matters
    Early in the piece, the Express sets Trump's position up as the frame for the strike plans. It gives no Iranian or IAEA account of the nuclear programme beside it.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes the premise that Iran is close to a weapon as the settled background to the story.
    The context
    The IAEA's finding of no credible indication of a coordinated weapons programme, reported elsewhere on the same day, never appears.

    How we know

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    The White House says Trump keeps all options open to stop Iran gaining a nuclear weapon. The IAEA has said it had no credible indication of a coordinated weapons programme, and Iran says it is not seeking one.

  2. Headline goes beyond the article

    Minor

    “Donald Trump drawing up plans to drop 'mother of all bombs' on Iran”

    Why this matters
    The headline states as plain fact that Trump is drawing up plans to drop the MOAB on Iran. It carries none of the attribution the body gives.
    The impression it gives
    A reader takes it as confirmed that Trump is preparing to drop the MOAB on Iran.
    The context
    The body says the plans are 'understood' and 'reported', sourced to anonymous officials speaking to CNN. The White House official would not confirm that such plans exist.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“is understood to be drawing up plans”
    • Elsewhere in the article“does not comment on sensitive military plans that may or may not exist”

    Show it in the article

  3. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    The article never says the war began with US-Israeli attacks in February. It speaks of Trump facing pressure to 'find a way out of the conflict' and of resuming combat operations. Without this fact a reader can take the US as a party drawn into a war rather than the side that started it.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Daily Express

Everything we scored from Daily Express