Daily Star, on UK Politics, 25 October 2026

3.0out of 10Minor

Second village to hold vote to leave UK over plans to house 900 migrants in RAF base

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.1 finding

Campaigners in a quiet village are set to hold vote to leave the UK over . Residents opposed to the Home Office's proposal to house 930 migrants at RAF Barnham in Suffolk voted in favour of the symbolic a "Piddington-style referendum". Only six or seven of the 80 in attendance in the village hall voted against it. The community - which has a population of 611 - is now set to follow in the footsteps of Piddington, in Oxfordshire, which voted to leave the UK last month over similar plans.

Despite the vote having no legal standing, Piddington hit the national headlines and the vote was raised by Prime Minister Andy Burnham. The Home Office originally earmarked RAF Barnham for 1,250 asylum seekers, but this week it emerged the department had withdrawn its application and lodged a new one for 930 people. Yesterday's meeting, open to residents only, held a straw poll on whether residents backed a referendum. Much of the fight put up by the village and West Suffolk Council, which covers the area, has centred on planning and environmental objections, with hopes protections for rare birds such as the stone curlew, which nests around the site, could be enough to thwart the scheme.

Some fear a referendum would be dismissed as a publicity stunt and undermine that work. But others, including parish council chairman John Bauer, argue the traditional approach can dovetail with bolder action. That thinking led a Barnham delegation on a fact-finding trip to Piddington last month, where leaders and locals urged them to follow suit. There they were also encouraged to launch Project Trump, a strategy drawn up by the Oxfordshire villagers to use local links such as Thomas Paine, who was born in nearby Thetford, and Dad's Army, which was filmed in the area, to catch the US president's eye.

Mr Bauer said: "The villagers of Barnham will decide on Saturday what action they wish to take to continue to oppose the imposition of the asylum seeker accommodation on the village. A Piddington-style referendum is one of those options. "I believe that a symbolic declaration of the desire to secede from the UK would show the strength of sentiment within the village and send a powerful message to Westminster. A Barnham referendum would show that Piddington's was not an isolated event, but potentially the start of a powerful movement."

The crunch meeting follows months of protests outside the base and growing questions over its condition and the Home Office's true intentions. Earlier this month, the Eastern Daily Press revealed the base currently has just 320 beds, and that public money was being spent on surveys and renovation work before the plans had been given the go-ahead. No final decision has been made, but the Home Office has previously said it hopes to move the first asylum seekers in before Christmas .

A date has not been set for Barnham's referendum, but a working group will meet on Monday to set out the timeline for the vote. The Home Office said: "We recognise the strength of feeling in local communities and are listening carefully to the concerns being raised."

Read the original article on dailystar.co.uk (opens in a new tab)
What we found (1)

The Daily Star reports that Barnham residents backed holding a symbolic Piddington-style referendum over Home Office plans for RAF Barnham, and says the vote has no legal standing. It gives the parish council chairman the space and a one-line Home Office statement, while the asylum seekers appear only as numbers.

  1. One side gets the space

    Minor

    “plans to move nearly 1,000 asylum seekers into a nearby RAF base”

    Why this matters
    The Daily Star presents the asylum seekers only as a number to be moved, and gives the space to the parish council chairman and a one-line Home Office statement.
    The impression it gives
    A reader hears the village's case at length and nothing from or about the people who would live at the base.
    The context
    The article quotes no asylum seeker, refugee group or anyone speaking for those to be housed. The only voices are the parish chairman's long quote and the Home Office.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“send a powerful message to Westminster”

    Show it in the article

What it gets right

  • “Despite the vote having no legal standing”

    It tells readers plainly that the Piddington vote is symbolic and has no legal effect.

  • “the Eastern Daily Press revealed the base currently has just 320 beds”

    It attributes the claim about the base's condition to the outlet that reported it.

  • “has centred on planning and environmental objections”

    It explains the substance of the council's and village's formal objections rather than only the protest.

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from Daily Star

  1. 26 OctAndy Burnham introduces town centre bans and curfews for one group of people3.0
  2. 26 OctWetherspoon's 'poppy ban' explained as army 'political' veteran refused entry0.0
  3. 26 OctAndy Burnham breaks silence on whether a general election will be called 'soon'0.0
  4. 26 OctAndy Burnham brings in major new parking rule impacting everyone – here's how3.0
  5. 25 OctPanic buyers raid supermarket shelves as government warns 'be ready for war' in 1,000 days3.0

Everything we scored from Daily Star