The Irish Times, on Iran, 3 November 2026

6.0out of 10Serious

US reportedly strikes Iran’s Qeshm Island as Vance voices optimism about a deal

Tap a highlight to see why it matters.3 findings

The ⁠ United States launched limited strikes on ​Iran late on Monday, ⁠according to reports, hours after vice-president JD Vance said he was optimistic diplomatic efforts to end the war were moving in the right direction. The strikes were reported as being “defensive”, and not thought to be a signal of a return to full hostilities, but came on the eve of crucial midterm election s in which Donald Trump’s Republican Party is expected to be punished by voters for the cascading effect the war has had on the US cost of living.

When asked earlier on Monday whether he had considered resuming strikes on Iran after Tuesday’s midterm elections, Trump replied “no”. Several explosions were ⁠heard ⁠on Iran’s Qeshm ​Island on Monday evening, according to Iranian state media, with local outlets describing their cause as unclear. The strikes – first reported by the Wall Street Journal (WSJ) – targeted surface to air missiles being used against US assets, according to Reuters and the Associated Press.

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

The article gives the US official account of the strikes but not the IRGC's statement the same day that it downed two US drones south of Qeshm. A reader gets only 'cause unclear' from the Iranian side.

How we know

US Central ‌Command did ​not immediately ⁠respond to ​a request for ​comment but the WSJ described the attacks as part of a series of strikes carried out against the country in recent weeks that have not been made public. [ Donald Trump’s ultimate Achilles heel: Fuel prices Opens in new window ] It reported the recent strikes had been carried out on a smaller scale and purposefully kept secret by the Trump administration so as not to signal ‌any intent of resuming the military campaign against Iran.

The US has targeted Qeshm Island on multiple occasions throughout the war. Positioned in the mouth of the Strait of Hormuz , the island has been used in the past to launch attacks on shipping in the waterway. , Iran has continued to enforce its closure of the strait by targeting oil tankers, shipping containers and other vessels attempting to transit the waterway. If confirmed, the attack would mark the first publicly known strike by the US on Iran in weeks. [ Iran says contacts with US over ending war continue Opens in new window ] On Monday, Vance said that he and Trump were optimistic about securing a deal with Iran, after Tehran revealed indirect negotiations with Washington.

Left out here: Leaves out what changes the picture

The article presents Iran's closure of the Strait of Hormuz as Iran's own ongoing act. It never says that the closure followed the war the US and Israel launched on 28 February, or that the US is blockading Iranian ports. The Irish Times reported both a day earlier. Without them a reader sees the strait dispute as Iranian action met by US defence.

How we know

“The president and I both feel pretty good about the prospects for potentially coming to a negotiated settlement,” Vance told reporters. “We’ve certainly made some progress. We’ll see if we can make some more.” Speaking to Fox News hours before the polls opened in the US on Tuesday, Trump continued to play down the significance of the conflict and its effects on the US economy. “There’s no war raging. It could happen if they don’t make a deal, but they want to make a deal very badly and there’s a very good chance we make a deal.”

However, he told host Sean Hannity that the US might still “have to go after Pickaxe mountain” – referring to a fortified underground site in central Iran that is a suspected nuclear facility – but said that it would not be a “big deal” and could be done in “one hour”. Speaking from Washington in his closing message of the midterms campaign, Trump hailed a sharp drop in oil prices that came as his administration touted a renewed diplomatic efforts being made to end the war.

Rising petrol prices have caused by the war have become a signature issue of the midterm elections, with polls showing voters likely to punish Republicans for the effect on the cost of living. – Guardian

Read the original article on irishtimes.com (opens in a new tab)
What we found (3)

The Irish Times, running Guardian copy, attributes the Qeshm Island strikes and their 'defensive' label carefully. In its own voice, though, it says attacks had ceased in recent weeks while Iran kept targeting ships, which its own WSJ-sourced sentences contradict. It also presents Iran's closure of the strait without the US blockade and the US-Israeli launch of the war that its earlier reporting tied to it, and it omits the IRGC's account of downing US drones near Qeshm.

  1. Makes a false claim

    Serious

    “Despite attacks having ceased in recent weeks”

    Why this matters
    The words 'Despite attacks having ceased in recent weeks' state in the outlet's own voice that US attacks on Iran had stopped, and set Iran's targeting of vessels against that supposed lull.
    The impression it gives
    A reader believes the US had stopped striking Iran for weeks while Iran alone kept up hostilities in the strait.
    The context
    The article itself reports, citing the WSJ, that the US carried out a series of secret strikes on Iran in recent weeks. The Anadolu Agency report says the same. Only public strikes had stopped, which the article concedes in S11 but not here.

    How we know

    • Elsewhere in the article“a series of strikes carried out against the country in recent weeks that have not been made public”
    • Elsewhere in the article“purposefully kept secret by the Trump administration”
    • Anadolu Agency (English) reported“American forces have continued conducting smaller-scale strikes against Iranian targets for several weeks”US carries out 'defensive' strikes on Iran’s Qeshm Island: Report (opens in a new tab)

    Show it in the article

    Written straight

    Although no US strikes had been made public in recent weeks, the WSJ reports that smaller secret strikes continued, and Iran has continued to enforce its closure of the strait by targeting vessels.

  2. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    The article presents Iran's closure of the Strait of Hormuz as Iran's own ongoing act. It never says that the closure followed the war the US and Israel launched on 28 February, or that the US is blockading Iranian ports. The Irish Times reported both a day earlier. Without them a reader sees the strait dispute as Iranian action met by US defence.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

  3. Leaves out what changes the picture

    Minor

    What is missing

    The article gives the US official account of the strikes but not the IRGC's statement the same day that it downed two US drones south of Qeshm. A reader gets only 'cause unclear' from the Iranian side.

    How we know

    Show where it belongs

How other outlets reported it

Spot something we missed? Report this article

More from The Irish Times

Everything we scored from The Irish Times